On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:22 PM, ludovico van wrote:
> Do you get something like
> udev: missing sysfs features; please update the kernel or
> disable the kernel's CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED option; udev may fail to
> work correctly
> in your boot messages or logs?
No. I use standard kernel. I unins
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Kamil Kułaga wrote:
> It looks like udev i blocking boot sequence. 22K svg image attached. I
> have no idea how to speedup this.
Do you get something like
udev: missing sysfs features; please update the kernel or
disable the kernel's CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED optio
Sorry for multiple emails.
It looks like udev i blocking boot sequence. 22K svg image attached. I
have no idea how to speedup this.
--
Pozdrawiam
<>
Switching to dependency based didn't help
[ 28.776007] input: HDA Digital PCBeep as
/devices/pci:00/:00:1b.0/input/input9
[ 119.416005] Adding 6000268k swap on /dev/sda3. Priority:-1
extents:1 across:6000268k
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Kamil Kułaga wrote:
> I still do not k
I still do not know what is happening between module init and swap
activation. But i think debconf tries to give me a clue
info: Checking if it is safe to convert to dependency based boot.
error: Unable to migrate to dependency based boot sequencing.
error: Problems detected: insserv: wa
2009/11/6 Kevin Buhr :
> Since this is at odds with what Kamil reported in his "dmesg.txt"
> (where he was swapping on /dev/sda3), either (1) I'm wrong about the
> kernel code, and it's something else that's sucking up all the time
> for both swap partitions and files, (2) Kamil's "/dev/sda3" is
>
Kevin Buhr wrote:
Kamil Kułaga writes:
After init of soundcard and before swap activation i have 90 seconds
hole. Is it normal? Can I configure kernel to somewhat avoid this?
Unfortunately, I think adding a large swap partition (yours is 6GB)
can be a slow operation under Linux. Googl
Kamil Kułaga writes:
>
> After init of soundcard and before swap activation i have 90 seconds
> hole. Is it normal? Can I configure kernel to somewhat avoid this?
Unfortunately, I think adding a large swap partition (yours is 6GB)
can be a slow operation under Linux. Google for "slow swapon" and
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 02:53:51AM +0900, Akira Kitada wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:08:12AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > You did not specify what kernel but I had to include a kernel
> > module to get proper DMA working.
> it's a problem of lack of proper module, don't you?
> if so,
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:16:28PM +0100, Jan Minar wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:01:37AM +0900, Akira Kitada wrote:
> > Partition check:
> > hda:<4>hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x61
> > hda: error waiting for DMA
> > hda: dma timeout retry: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete Data
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 10:08:12AM -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Akira Kitada wrote:
> >Hi all.
> >
> > a few days ago, I had 82.3GB disk installed on my box
> >as primary slave.
> >after that, I turned it on and reading messages of kernel,
> >and found messages that means 'hdb' recognized smoo
Akira Kitada wrote:
Hi all.
a few days ago, I had 82.3GB disk installed on my box
as primary slave.
after that, I turned it on and reading messages of kernel,
and found messages that means 'hdb' recognized smoothly.
that's good.
badly, I found some error messages too,
and noticed booting is ver
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:01:37AM +0900, Akira Kitada wrote:
> Partition check:
> hda:<4>hda: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x61
> hda: error waiting for DMA
> hda: dma timeout retry: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
>
> blk: queue c04102a0, I/O limit 4095Mb (mask 0x
Hi all.
a few days ago, I had 82.3GB disk installed on my box
as primary slave.
after that, I turned it on and reading messages of kernel,
and found messages that means 'hdb' recognized smoothly.
that's good.
badly, I found some error messages too,
and noticed booting is very slower than before
14 matches
Mail list logo
