ben wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:20 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
> [snip]
>
>>Excuse me, but I think that preventing someone from inadvertently nuking
>>their whole Debian installation might have something to do with Debian.
>>
>>
>>>do i have to wait for someone else to invoke godwin's
On Saturday 05 October 2002 04:44 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 04:38:53AM -0700, ben wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 October 2002 04:14 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:53:21AM -0700, ben wrote:
> > > > btw, you're (moc)ked return address is more than half wa
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 04:38:53AM -0700, ben wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 04:14 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:53:21AM -0700, ben wrote:
> > > btw, you're (moc)ked return address is more than half way to spam
> > > rejection by my very liberal filters.
> >
> > I as
On Saturday 05 October 2002 04:14 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:53:21AM -0700, ben wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:36 am, ben wrote:
> > > On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:20 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > btw, you're (moc)ked return address is more than ha
On Thursday 03 October 2002 08:38 pm, Leo Spalteholz wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 03:36:35 -0700
>
> ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:20 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > Excuse me, but I think that preventing someone from inadvertently
> > > nuking thei
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:53:21AM -0700, ben wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:36 am, ben wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:20 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
[...]
> btw, you're (moc)ked return address is more than half way to spam
> rejection by my very liberal filters.
I assume you're
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002 03:36:35 -0700
ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:20 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > Excuse me, but I think that preventing someone from inadvertently nuking
> > their whole Debian installation might have something to do with Debian.
> >
>
On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:36 am, ben wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:20 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
> [snip]
>
> > Excuse me, but I think that preventing someone from inadvertently nuking
> > their whole Debian installation might have something to do with Debian.
> >
> > > do i have to w
On Saturday 05 October 2002 03:20 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
[snip]
>
> Excuse me, but I think that preventing someone from inadvertently nuking
> their whole Debian installation might have something to do with Debian.
>
> > do i have to wait for someone else to invoke godwin's law, or is this
> > e
On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 09:45, ben wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2002 12:32 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 19:43, Kourosh Ghassemieh wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:30:47PM +0100, jerry k wrote:
> > > > Kourosh wrote:
> > > > > One thing you may want to try is to use W2
On Saturday 05 October 2002 12:32 am, Peter Whysall wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 19:43, Kourosh Ghassemieh wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:30:47PM +0100, jerry k wrote:
> > > Kourosh wrote:
> > > > One thing you may want to try is to use W2K's disk management
> > > > tools to delete the la
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 19:43, Kourosh Ghassemieh wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:30:47PM +0100, jerry k wrote:
> > Kourosh wrote:
> >
> > > One thing you may want to try is to use W2K's disk management
> > > tools to delete the last partitioan, i.e. G:, then reboot
> > > so that it is no longe
jerry k wrote:
>
> I'm new to GNU/Linux & Debian and am having a problem with installing to a
> system running Win2k...
You should just get a cheap/free second pc to play with. No need
to worry about crashing and reinstalling windoze then.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 07:30:47PM +0100, jerry k wrote:
> Kourosh wrote:
>
> > One thing you may want to try is to use W2K's disk management
> > tools to delete the last partitioan, i.e. G:, then reboot
> > so that it is no longer recognized as drive G: in Windows.
> > That should clear up the p
Josh wrote:
> I have had a similar problem when dualbooting with XP. The problem is
when you
> create partitions within Windows Windows thinks that the said partitions
are
> Windows native so it goes and tries to "mount" the partitions even though
they
> have an ext2 filesystem. What you need t
On Friday 04 October 2002 19:47, jerry k wrote:
# I'm new to GNU/Linux & Debian and am having a problem with installing to a
# system running Win2k. I've done a lot of reading on the dual-boot subject
# but haven't seen anything to make me believe there's anything wrong with my
# setup. Basicall
Kourosh wrote:
> One thing you may want to try is to use W2K's disk management
> tools to delete the last partitioan, i.e. G:, then reboot
> so that it is no longer recognized as drive G: in Windows.
> That should clear up the problem with Explorer trying to
> read the G: drive.
This won't affec
On approximately Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 06:47:39PM +0100, jerry k wrote:
> I'm new to GNU/Linux & Debian and am having a problem with installing to a
> system running Win2k. I've done a lot of reading on the dual-boot subject
> but haven't seen anything to make me believe there's anything wrong wit
Jerry,
One thing you may want to try is to use W2K's disk management
tools to delete the last partitioan, i.e. G:, then reboot
so that it is no longer recognized as drive G: in Windows.
That should clear up the problem with Explorer trying to
read the G: drive.
Then you can go ahead and use cfd
I'm new to GNU/Linux & Debian and am having a problem with installing to a
system running Win2k. I've done a lot of reading on the dual-boot subject
but haven't seen anything to make me believe there's anything wrong with my
setup. Basically, my partitions looked like this:
Primary: C: / hda1
20 matches
Mail list logo
