On Saturday 05 October 2002 04:44 am, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 04:38:53AM -0700, ben wrote: > > On Saturday 05 October 2002 04:14 am, Colin Watson wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:53:21AM -0700, ben wrote: > > > > btw, you're (moc)ked return address is more than half way to spam > > > > rejection by my very liberal filters. > > > > > > I assume you're talking to Peter. What's wrong with ntl? They're a > > > normal and perfectly legitimate UK ISP. > > > > i have no issue with ntl, just with the posted address on peter's email. > > > > >Peter Whysall > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >The TLD in my email address is sdrawkcab. > > Oh, that. Bleh. I don't see why I should care about sigs, the return > address in the headers is perfectly valid.
i'm not suggesting that you should care. this is the header reference on which my comment was based: Received: from polonius.tranquillity.lan ([10.200.1.2] helo=localhost.localdomain) ben -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
