Hello Mark,
On Oct 8, Mark Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > There needs to be a dash between the first two words:
| > "keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve"
Oops. Thanks for the correction.
| > Is it just me or is it normal that your message can't be proven to be
| > authentic?
|
On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:36:56PM +0200, Claudio Bley wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 14:49, Jason Wojciechowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Oct 8, wrote:
> >
> > | I saw quite many PGP signed messages in this list.
> > | How can I get the posters
On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 14:49, Jason Wojciechowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Oct 8, wrote:
>
> | I saw quite many PGP signed messages in this list.
> | How can I get the posters' public keys easily from mutt?
>
> If you use the "keyserver options auto-key-retrie
Hello,
On Oct 8, wrote:
| I saw quite many PGP signed messages in this list.
| How can I get the posters' public keys easily from mutt?
If you use the "keyserver options auto-key-retrieve" in your
..gnupg/options file, gnupg will try to grab the key automatically.
-
u wrote:
>BTW, why don't people put their public keys on key servers like
>pgp.mit.edu? The keys would be propagated to other servers anyway; the
>ones in pgp.net. I believe that would make our lives a bit easier; one
>definition of keyserver in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf, we could retrieve others'
>pub
Hi,
I saw quite many PGP signed messages in this list.
How can I get the posters' public keys easily from mutt?
On one particular message, I had the following:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue 08 Oct 2002 02:52:39 PM WIT)
--]
gpg: Signature made Tue 08 Oct 2002 01:05:31 PM WIT usin
Here's a rather long thread, snipped quite a bit by me, from the mutt
mailing list talking about attachments that MS Outlook Express (and
others) users get from *some* people who use mutt... Take it for what
it's worth.
Hall
- Forwarded message from David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
% > %
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
I use elm to write my email messages. I want to sign messages from inside elm.
Is there any way to do this and is possible to sign messages from an X email
client (Netscape Messenger) ?
Thanks..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iD8DBQE6L/C4W
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>However Wichert Akkerman closed the bug report. I believe he was
>confused and thought that the files were supplied with PGP, and
>as such had the same license restrictions. This is wrong. The files
>do not come with PGP - they are supplied with the freely
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>One other thing, I saw references to 'language.txt' and
>'language50.txt' (for PGP2 and PGP5, respectively) in the Mutt
>docs. However, it appears that the Debian package doesn't come with
>these files. Would this be considered a bug, and if so, should I f
Greetings everyone.
After seeing quite a few postings about Mutt and PGP in the past few
days, I decided I'd finally get around to setting it up myself. I've
got it working fine with GnuPG and PGP2, but I have a question about
PGP5... I don't know if this is really specific to Mutt, though.
I sen
Bob Nielsen:
> I keep getting this with all of the messages to the list from Steve Lamb:
[just a couple of PGP status lines, with no text between]
Me too!
The way I usually get around it is to type |less at elm (five characters
plus enter). I assume it'll work similarly in pine.
The same trick w
folder, the text is viewable and
>there IS a signature:
>I'm running pgp-us 2.6.3a-5 and pinepgp 3.6. All other signed messages
>seem to be displayed normally. Does my computer just not like Steve, or
>is there some other explanation?
There is another explination. I am signi
re:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBNreo9Xpf7K2LbpnFEQK2HwCg5XDcA1/45B3QO/wXX42Yb1YIy2kAoO3j
qGCPKFyOhNpPDqj5inWAbLvT
=Ykz/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
I'm running pgp-us 2.6.3a-5 and pinepgp 3.6. All other signed messages
14 matches
Mail list logo
