In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >However Wichert Akkerman closed the bug report. I believe he was >confused and thought that the files were supplied with PGP, and >as such had the same license restrictions. This is wrong. The files >do not come with PGP - they are supplied with the freely available >mutt source!!!!
(if there really are licensing issues, then it would also be a problem with the source code, wouldn't it???) Arrrggghhhh!!!! I made the same mistake again! It was Marco d'Itri who closed the bug report, not Wichert Akkerman, however, I get the impression that both were confused in the same way (ie they both thought the file in question was supplied with PGP). I apologize for the confusion... >I submitted further messages to the bug tracking system on this, but >Wichert Akkerman hasn't replied or reopened the bug report - maybe I >should do it myself before it expires??? (side note: how do I do this?) -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpP38j85sPM5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
