Thank you very much for your help.
> Adrián Ribao Martínez put forth on 6/7/2010 7:10 AM:
> > Thank you very much Javier,
> >
> > We don't need virtualization in the server, I suppose it's the same and
> > everything works ok.
> >
> > Do you have a RAID controller in the system?
>
> According
Adrián Ribao Martínez put forth on 6/7/2010 7:10 AM:
> Thank you very much Javier,
>
> We don't need virtualization in the server, I suppose it's the same and
> everything works ok.
>
> Do you have a RAID controller in the system?
According to this:
https://sp.ts.fujitsu.com/dmsp/docs/ds_prim-r
Thank you very much Javier,
We don't need virtualization in the server, I suppose it's the same and
everything works ok.
Do you have a RAID controller in the system?
Thank you.
> Hi,
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are about to buy a Fuji
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Adrián Ribao Martínez wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are about to buy a Fujitsu server:
>
> * Fujitsu Primergy RX300
>
> and I'd like to know if someone has experience with it. I'm afraid that The
> server is not supported by debian. They don't list debian in the suppor
Hello,
We are about to buy a Fujitsu server:
* Fujitsu Primergy RX300
and I'd like to know if someone has experience with it. I'm afraid that The
server is not supported by debian. They don't list debian in the supported OS
and there are no drivers for this server.
Thank you for your help,
A
Am 2006-06-27 15:16:50, schrieb Johannes Wiedersich:
> My _personal_ recommendation is not to use a hardware-raid (depending on
> your data-security considerations). Our hardware-raid-5 controller
> recently died just a few weeks before guarantee expired. Had it survived
> some more weeks, it w
Hi There,
Wondering if any one has any info on the new IBM Series x3650 servers
running with Debian. In particualr with the upgraded ServeRAID-8k SAS
Controller option (25R8064) from IBM? This has full RAID 5 support
with battery backup of 72 hours.
Im guessing that the only issue with this serv
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:10:45 + (GMT)
ZeroUno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 08:00:27AM +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Kevin Mark ha scritto:
> That's why I'm here.
> Being sure about this, based only on vendor and official web site
> informations, is not possible. They simply tell you that they are sure
> their stuff works fine with RH etc., and that t
Thanks, this brings some relief.
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit scared to find out that only binary
downloads for a restricted range of operating systems are available...
this happened with an IBM machine, and now I'm look
Kevin Mark ha scritto:
more modern CPU (maybe a dual cpu) and such. If you are not monitoring
your useage, it would be a good way to determine if you need a new
machine.
The current server actually satisfies our current needs, it's not
overloaded. But we are in one of those times when the com
On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:10:45PM +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the possibility to upgr
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:10 +, ZeroUno wrote:
> Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
> file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
> "standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
> Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it,
ZeroUno wrote:
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
"standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it, and we also want
to consider REAL server
ZeroUno wrote:
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a bit scared to find out that only binary
downloads for a restricted range of operating systems are available...
this happened with an IBM machine, and now I'm looking for an Intel
s
Goran wrote:
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
Thanks, this brings some relief.
The problem is that, when searching for info about a server machine
offered by the reseller, I'm a b
Goran wrote:
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
My actual recommendation for server with several responsibilities in
small companies is an Vanerpool enabled Intel-machine for using with
Hello, my personal view is that all this stuff ("someOS-compatible") is
crap. Just look for good & qualitative parts for the server and that's
it.
My actual recommendation for server with several responsibilities in
small companies is an Vanerpool enabled Intel-machine for using with
Xen, some gigs
Hello, I work in a small company where we have an internal
file/web/some-other-small-things server running Debian Sarge. It's a
"standard" PC used for server purposes, not a real server.
Now we're investigating the possibility to upgrade it, and we also want
to consider REAL servers, but... judgin
Hello,
I 'am running Apache Webserver on debian/Linux 2.2
and on the webserver I've placed a signed Applet Cab file for Internet Explorer
Clients. But looks like the same cab file which executes properly on Internet
Explorer through Microsoft's IIS does not work on the debian server mentioned
20 matches
Mail list logo
