On Sat, Mar 31, 2001 at 06:02:09PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Some messages I received told me that some users already have
> some of this "paranoid" tools tunned. Could we get this stuff together?
> Maybe creating a sub-project or a workgroup to accomplish this? Is there
> anything al
In thinking about the possibility of creating a more secure
version of debian linux, I wonder if suid programs should
not be automatically compiled with Stack Guard (or the like)
and linked to libs with Format Guard. The Stack Guard part
would be really easy, although Format Guard may be a little
t
Hello ALL!
I'd like to thanx everyone who replied (even those flames I
received directly, with no echo through the list...>/dev/null).
Well.. maybe a new port is too much. Maybe some
task-secure-system (or whatever), kernel-hardened and harden-XXX
XX packages are a better approach
On Fri, Mar 30, 2001 at 05:48:28PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that this is generally a great idea. There is
definately a need for a more secure system than the default, and
besides, efforts to create a fortified port could lead to
improvements in the standard distro as well.
>
Hello!
I'm a Debian user since its hamm release. Some of the things that
always woried me (and I guess, a couple of other users) is the lack of
security hardening in the Debian distro. This email is to report some
idea I've got sometime ago. I have already posted this idea to
debian-user,
5 matches
Mail list logo
