#x27;apt-cache search
netscape | less')
| 2. Sawmill
| The sawmill window manager doesn't seem to work. But I have no problem
| with the other window manager like Enlightenment and Wmaker. What
| gives? Basically, when I switch from Enlightenment (or any window manager
| for that matter) to
o set I got had netscape.
Besides, you don't wanna use netscape anyway. It sucks. :)
> 2. Sawmill
> The sawmill window manager doesn't seem to work. But I have no
> problem with the other window manager like Enlightenment and Wmaker.
> What gives? Basically, when I swi
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 11:05:34PM -0500, dman wrote:
| any case, sawmill is also outdated and I recommend getting sawfish
| (the new name, legal issues) from woody. I have version 0.38
| installed right now (I think potato's sawmill is back at 0.20 or
| something) and I see that 1.0
#x27;s a hint : 'apt-cache search
netscape | less')
| 2. Sawmill
| The sawmill window manager doesn't seem to work. But I have no problem
| with the other window manager like Enlightenment and Wmaker. What
| gives? Basically, when I switch from Enlightenment (or any window man
that comes close to
Netscape is the netscape-base. Doesn't Debian (I got the 3-disk download
version) come with any Netscape package?
2. Sawmill
The sawmill window manager doesn't seem to work. But I have no problem
with the other window manager like Enlightenment and Wmake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi, I want to use a Sawmill scheme I downloaded, but I don't have the right
>version of Sawmill. Does anyone know where I can get version 0.30?
Sawmill is now Sawfish. Sawmill schemes should work in Sawfish.
__
www.edsamail.com
On Fri, November 16, 2001 at 17:07:35,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I want to use a Sawmill scheme I downloaded, but I don't have the right
> version of Sawmill. Does anyone know where I can get version 0.30?
Take a look at http://sawmill.sourceforge.net/
Hi, I want to use a Sawmill scheme I downloaded, but I don't have the right
version of Sawmill. Does anyone know where I can get version 0.30?
Thanks,
Deven Gallo
"Steve Dondley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have X installed with Sawmill as my window manager. That's all I need at
> this point since I mostly use X for Netscape.
xset m a t
a is the acceleration, t is the threshold. Normal acceleration is 1, but
if it moves
On 29 Aug 2001 12:04:50 -0700, Mike Pfleger wrote:
> * Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Adjust it in the Gnome Control Panel or 'gnomecc' application.
>
> Errr.. I thought the original post was clear that _only_ sawfish/
> sawmill was being used.
> * Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Adjust it in the Gnome Control Panel or 'gnomecc'
application.
>
> Errr.. I thought the original post was clear that _only_
sawfish/
> sawmill was being used. Or did I misunderstand that? I am
pretty
> intere
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Mike Pfleger wrote:
> * Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Adjust it in the Gnome Control Panel or 'gnomecc' application.
>
> Errr.. I thought the original post was clear that _only_ sawfish/
> sawmill was being used. Or did I m
* Hall Stevenson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Adjust it in the Gnome Control Panel or 'gnomecc' application.
Errr.. I thought the original post was clear that _only_ sawfish/
sawmill was being used. Or did I misunderstand that? I am pretty
interested in the answer to this, my
> My only problem with my setup is the mouse movement
> is way too sluggish. How can I change it's sensitivity? I
> looked in the "Customize" menu from the popup menu
> but didn't see anything that adjusted the mouse operation.
Adjust it in the Gnome Control Panel or 'gnomecc' application.
Regar
I have X installed with Sawmill as my window manager. That's all I need at
this point since I mostly use X for Netscape.
My only problem with my setup is the mouse movement is way too sluggish.
How can I change it's sensitivity? I looked in the "Customize" menu from
the p
d the .enlightenment folder
for chimera and it came up with nothing.
Also, how do I set up sawmill so that it works under GNOME?
The control panel complains to xterm that it can't run
sawmill-client.
I am using Debian 2.2 r0
___
I'm using a version of Debian Potato, and the sawmill package
isn't working properly. Sorry, I'm not on my own computer just
now so I can't tell you what version of the package it is.
When I select it in the the GNOME control centre it complains
to the shell that it can&#x
security.debian.org. I've been trying out sawmill
as a window-manager and liking it well. On one of the machines,
everything works smoothly. On the other, the mouse works perfectly
well for window operations, but I have no menus. Clicking the mouse on
the background image produces no output an
Gnome
CC. But no changes got accepted. So, went to the command line; ran
sawmill-ui; the error message revealed some config problem (don't
remember exactly). Read the docs and thought I need a
~/.sawfish/custom file. It didn't exist so I 'touch'ed it.
And now, I can make chang
"Jonathan Wheelhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nothing happens when I click on the 'Run configuration tool for
> Sawmill' within the Gnome Control Center.
Sawfish (as it is called by now) is configurable in GCC itself (look a
little bit further down ...)
Hi
Nothing happens when I click on the 'Run configuration tool for
Sawmill' within the Gnome Control Center.
What gives?
Jonathan
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:56:27PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>
> What's the difference between sawfish and sawmill (for gnome)? They seem
> to conflict with each other, and have the same descriptions.
Sawmill was old name for the project. Sawfish is the new name,
following a
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 03:56:27PM -0600, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> What's the difference between sawfish and sawmill (for gnome)? They seem
> to conflict with each other, and have the same descriptions.
>
> Which is better/newer?
I think he had to abandon sawmill in favor o
What's the difference between sawfish and sawmill (for gnome)? They seem
to conflict with each other, and have the same descriptions.
Which is better/newer?
...RickM...
Ron Farrer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have it mostly working correctly, here is what I've got now:
> For right now I just want to know what I am _supposed_ to have in these
> boxes inside gnomecc:
>
> Name: - I just put "Sawmill/Sawfish"
Same
> Command:
In the last couple of day I installed Debian potato on a dual boot
machine and am now in the process of trying to get everything setup
properly.
I installed gnome, gdm and sawmill. Unfortunately, in gnome all the
windows are missing the top panel where the minimize, maximise and close
Christian Pernegger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You could try to purge sawmill-gnome & then install it again.
>
> (BTW sawmill is session-managed)
I could but it is a FRESH install that I did last night. I have never
had sawmill/sawfish installed before...
Thanks,
Ron
--
E
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Farrer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2000 12:12 AM
> To: Christian Pernegger
> Cc: Debian User
> Subject: Re: sawmill + gnome?
>
>
> Christian Pernegger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > For m
Christian Pernegger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> For me, it was sufficient too install the package "sawmill-gnome". It
> should set everything up for you and insert the correct entry in the
> wm configuration.
Hmm maybe the problem is elsewhere?
$ dpkg -s sawmill-gnome
Pac
> -Original Message-
> From: Ron Farrer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2000 8:56 PM
> To: Debian User
> Subject: sawmill + gnome?
>
> Hello;
>
> I am trying to get sawmill to work correctly with gnome. Previously I
> was using
On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 11:55:31AM -0700, Ron Farrer wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
> I am trying to get sawmill to work correctly with gnome. Previously I
> was using windowmaker.
>
> For right now I just want to know what I am _supposed_ to have in these
> boxes inside gnomecc:
Hello;
I am trying to get sawmill to work correctly with gnome. Previously I
was using windowmaker.
For right now I just want to know what I am _supposed_ to have in these
boxes inside gnomecc:
Name: - I just put "Sawmill/Sawfish"
Command: - '/usr/bin/sawmill' is what
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 02:52:21PM -0700, Joey Hess wrote:
> kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > Not sure of Sawmill's default behavior, but the herringbone is the
> > default X Windows background (there's a reason for it, lost in the mists
> > of time).
>
> Not particularly lost. Such a display makes
kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> Not sure of Sawmill's default behavior, but the herringbone is the
> default X Windows background (there's a reason for it, lost in the mists
> of time).
Not particularly lost. Such a display makes it easy to see moire
patterns if your monitor is subtly out of tuns, a
I have the same problem with sawmill. Nothing but that herringbone
screen. I wanted to leave KDE only because it is getting to be a
huge memory hog. I have tried other desktop environments/wm's
including Gnome-icewm and now Windowmaker. Enlightenment looks nice,
but I had gone back to KDE
Try this: Install Gnome and then put this in your ~/.xsession
#!/bin/sh
panel &
gmc &
exec sawmill
I installed Gnome, but you could install some other environment.
--
Andrew
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 04:14:37PM -, Pollywog wrote:
> I have the same problem with sawmill. Nothing but that herringbone
> screen. I wanted to leave KDE only because it is getting to be a
> huge memory hog. I have tried other desktop environments/wm's
> including Gn
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 03:45:41PM +0100, Simon Jefford wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Lindsay Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 03 July 2000 15:31
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: sawmill is a herring b
I have the same problem with sawmill. Nothing but that herringbone
screen. I wanted to leave KDE only because it is getting to be a
huge memory hog. I have tried other desktop environments/wm's
including Gnome-icewm and now Windowmaker. Enlightenment looks nice,
but I had gone back to KDE
> -Original Message-
> From: Lindsay Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 03 July 2000 15:31
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: sawmill is a herring bone screen
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I can run windowmaker, enlightenment and icewm qu
Hi all,
I can run windowmaker, enlightenment and icewm quite happily. But when I
try sawmill I just get the herring bone screen. The only sign of
intelligence is that the middle mouse button produces a set of menus.
This is on three different potato boxes, using either current sawmill or
the
the mouse popup menu)
I can't find where to set the "minimum horizontal viewport size".
There's no option for this where the flip viewport/workspace toggle
is. I'm using sawmill .26.
P.S. The menu I get when clicking the middle button of the mouse has
"Customize-
Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
> Francesco Bochicchio wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:32:40 Ed Cogburn wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I have GNOME and Sawmill/Sawfish (latest debs from potato/woody) and
> > > I want to have 4 workspaces in a horizo
Francesco Bochicchio wrote:
>
> On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:32:40 Ed Cogburn wrote:
> >
> >
> > I have GNOME and Sawmill/Sawfish (latest debs from potato/woody) and
> > I want to have 4 workspaces in a horizontal row. The GNOME pager
> > works as I want it t
On Thu, 29 Jun 2000 18:32:40 Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
>
> I have GNOME and Sawmill/Sawfish (latest debs from potato/woody) and
> I want to have 4 workspaces in a horizontal row. The GNOME pager
> works as I want it to, except that Sawmill allows moving the cursor to
> the to
I have GNOME and Sawmill/Sawfish (latest debs from potato/woody) and
I want to have 4 workspaces in a horizontal row. The GNOME pager
works as I want it to, except that Sawmill allows moving the cursor to
the top or bottom of the screen as a way to change workspaces just
like moving the
for those following this subject, the new version 0.25.2-2 has just
fixed this problem, and sawmill was worth the (minimal thanks to
dselect) effort :), I'll stick with it ...
thanks for the answers ...
jan
Jan Pfeifer writes:
> hi all,
>
> I've just installed t
Jan Pfeifer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've just installed the Sawmill 0.25.2-1 package, but sawmill won't
> run, and keep mumbling
>
> "error--> (invalid-function (macro . #))"
>
> to me, each time I run :)
It's a bug in one of the re
On Son, 23 Apr 2000, Jan Pfeifer wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I've just installed the Sawmill 0.25.2-1 package, but sawmill won't
> run, and keep mumbling
>
> "error--> (invalid-function (macro . #))"
>
> to me, each time I run :)
>
> if I r
hi all,
I've just installed the Sawmill 0.25.2-1 package, but sawmill won't
run, and keep mumbling
"error--> (invalid-function (macro . #))"
to me, each time I run :)
if I run it with the "--interp" option it seems to run, but without
the menus and don'
I can't seem to get sawmill to stop reading /etc/X11/sawmill/debian-menu.jl.
It's quite annoying. What I really want is to have a specific user of my
system be able to ignore this file, and be able to define his own sawmill menu.
Any ideas on how to accomplish this?
Bryan
> From: Fish Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...--being "on top" may be inextricably
> linked with being in focus, as it is in windows.
That is not true. (A utility called TweakUI can change that setting
in MS Windows.)
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Hmm. A little worrisome: htt
On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 09:44:43PM -0800, Fish Smith wrote
> > How can I configure Sawmill/Gnome so that a window
> >will rise to the
> >top
> >if I click on the title bar?
>
> > I prefer a sloppy focus, one where I can move the
> >mouse over a
> &g
on click.
TaoX
--
www.muhri.net/TaoX
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ: '61511769'
AOL IM: 'TaoX 0x1'
- Original Message -
From: "Fish Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 12:44 AM
Subject: Re:
> How can I configure Sawmill/Gnome so that a window
>will rise to the
>top
>if I click on the title bar?
> I prefer a sloppy focus, one where I can move the
>mouse over a
>window and
>have it in focus. However, I don't necessarily want
>that window to
>
Randy Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Here's my stupid question for the day (I'm allotted one per day,
> aren't
> I?!:-).
>
>How can I configure Sawmill/Gnome so that a window will rise to the
> top
> if I click on the title bar?
By defau
Here's my stupid question for the day (I'm allotted one per day, aren't
I?!:-).
How can I configure Sawmill/Gnome so that a window will rise to the top
if I click on the title bar?
I prefer a sloppy focus, one where I can move the mouse over a window and
have it in foc
Someone referred me to this site which has the deb packages for sawmill and
it works great. I haven't had any problems yet.
http://www.devin.com/sawmill
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miguel Wooding SF Ten.Union)
To: "Joseph de los Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: debian-
"Joseph de los Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greetings!
>
> I would like to know if sawmill can be used with slink and if so, how do I
> do this.
This doesn't answer your question directly, but you might take a look
at scwm, which is packaged for slin
Greetings!
I would like to know if sawmill can be used with slink and if so, how do I
do this.
Thank you
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
On Tue, Jan 11, 2000 at 02:43:02PM -0800, Jim McCloskey wrote
>
> |> I would like to give sawmill a try. So I tried "apt-get --compile
> |> source" to grab the potato sources and build in my machine. The
> |> process failed (it seems that I have old dpkg-utils
|> I would like to give sawmill a try. So I tried "apt-get --compile
|> source" to grab the potato sources and build in my machine. The
|> process failed (it seems that I have old dpkg-utils?). Any hints on
|> how can I compile sawmill in my machine?
You can get the t
Hello,
I am running slink with october-gnome from http://www.debian.org/~vincent.
(thank you Vincent ! :-)
I would like to give sawmill a try. So I tried "apt-get --compile source" to
grab the potato sources and build in my machine. The process failed (it seems
that I have old dpkg-ut
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, David J. Kanter wrote:
> I have Sawmill 0.16 and last night tried to apt-get the latest available,
> 0.18, from this site: deb http://www.rcpt.to/ pending main. However, the
> install failed because of librep5 problems.
Had the same thing happen to me...
> Eve
I have Sawmill 0.16 and last night tried to apt-get the latest available,
0.18, from this site: deb http://www.rcpt.to/ pending main. However, the
install failed because of librep5 problems.
Everything went smoothly and was seemingly uneventful until the end. I ran
apt-get update, then apt-get
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 09:00:19AM -0500, Tam Than Ma wrote
>
> As of right now, I have decided to give Sawmill a try since many people
> recommended it. But my Debian Box doesn't have internet access so I can't
> download or use apt-get to get sawmill online. So how do I
"Tam Than Ma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As of right now, I have decided to give Sawmill a try since many people
> recommended it. But my Debian Box doesn't have internet access so I can't
> download or use apt-get to get sawmill online. So how do I go abo
As of right now, I have decided to give Sawmill a try since many people
recommended it. But my Debian Box doesn't have internet access so I can't
download or use apt-get to get sawmill online. So how do I go about doing
this? Can I download the Sawmill package and all its dependant p
Where did you get sawmill 0.17 from? I'm running Potato and the latest
available deb version is 0.16-1. Are you compiling that yourself?
--
Pedro
> "Eric Gillespie, Jr." wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 02:26:46PM +,
> Pedro Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 02:26:46PM +,
Pedro Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following looks to me like a bug against sawmill: Launch the "same
> gnome" game and click the "maximize" button. This always logs me out of
> the gnome-session (which is my
The following looks to me like a bug against sawmill: Launch the "same
gnome" game and click the "maximize" button. This always logs me out of
the gnome-session (which is my only command in .xsession) killing all
other applications except communicator which has to be killed ma
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 03:33:25PM -0800, Eric G . Miller wrote:
> IMO, the sawmill in potato is slightly broken because it isn't picking
> up the debian menu system. Hopefully this will be fixed before release.
And I thought I had screwed something up...Good to know I'm not
On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 05:17:05PM -0600, David J. Kanter wrote:
> I've heard a lot of good things about Sawmill, so I downloaded it an started
> looking at the documentation. The problem is, I haven't the foggiest idea on
> how to use all the functions. The docs seem to be w
I've heard a lot of good things about Sawmill, so I downloaded it an started
looking at the documentation. The problem is, I haven't the foggiest idea on
how to use all the functions. The docs seem to be written from someone with
experience in lisp, which I really don't have.
74 matches
Mail list logo
