. . .
>
> and top still shows no signs of a second processor :(
>
> Am I still missing something? It's dual P-II's (gateway ns7000)
>
> rick
>
TOP, as it is normally shipped, does not show a second CPU. It is
designed for single-CPU systems only.
If you want to get a multiple-CPU top, look
Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
> and I did a
>
> make dep clean bzImage bzlilo modules modules install
> depmod -a
> shutdown -r now
>
> and top still shows no signs of a second processor :(
>
> Am I still missing something? It's dual P-II's (gateway ns7000)
>
> rick
Telling lilo to boot your ne
On Mon, 29 Jun 1998, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
: Steve wrote,
:
: > That's it.
:
: hmm, still doesn't seem to do it. My Makefile now reads,
[ snip ]
: and top still shows no signs of a second processor :(
:
: Am I still missing something? It's dual P-II's (gateway ns7000)
We have a
Steve wrote,
> That's it.
hmm, still doesn't seem to do it. My Makefile now reads,
ARCH = i386
#
# For SMP kernels, set this. We don't want to have this in the config file
# because it makes re-config very ugly and too many fundamental files depend
# on "CONFIG_SMP"
#
# NOTE! SMP is experime
Rick,
That's it.
Have a good one,
Steve
Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> steve wrote,
>
> > From what I've experienced, this should be
>
> > SMP=1
>
> Ahah. recompiling. So this is a 1 means use it, but defaults to 0/don't,
> rather than the number of processors?
>
> thanks
>
> r
steve wrote,
> From what I've experienced, this should be
> SMP=1
Ahah. recompiling. So this is a 1 means use it, but defaults to 0/don't,
rather than the number of processors?
thanks
rick
--
These opinions will not be those of ISU until it pays my retainer.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
My understanding of this was that SMP was a logical flag which, when set
to 1, would automatically handle any number of processors up to 16 or so.
Perhaps 16 is going a bit far but it works fine with 2.
J. Goldman
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Rick,
From what I've experienced, this should be
SMP=1
Steve Mayer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> hmm. I don't seem to be getting this. From what I've read, All I need for an
> SMP kernel is to change two lines to /usr/doc/linux/Makefile, so that it reads
>
> # NOTE
hmm. I don't seem to be getting this. From what I've read, All I need for an
SMP kernel is to change two lines to /usr/doc/linux/Makefile, so that it reads
# NOTE! SMP is experimental. See the file Documentation/SMP.txt
#
SMP = 2
#
# SMP profiling options
and then do the normal make, lilo,
9 matches
Mail list logo
