El jue, 18 de nov de 1999, a las 12:35:54 +0100, Klaus Drews dijo:
> Hi,
>
> just a small hint :
> somewhere there is a README in the docs, which says, that you have
> to load and unload and convert things to work with 5.005. Look for it,
> befor upgrading. I crashed my system some time ago becaus
Hi,
just a small hint :
somewhere there is a README in the docs, which says, that you have
to load and unload and convert things to work with 5.005. Look for it,
befor upgrading. I crashed my system some time ago because I ran the
fast way, just installing.
By the way - if anyone has a proper desc
aight... probably the safest will be to do
an `apt-get install' of a package which requires perl5 and, theoretically,
apt will take care of installing all required packages. I'm thinking of
installing satan, so doing:
# apt-get install satan
should take care of upgrading all the above
Ben Collins wrote:
> It's a potato package.
I see.
It's a reason to upgrade.
But, why do I need to...? I'm trying to getting used to slink.
BTW, what is the meaning of "unstable" in potato? Crashes periodically?
It's OK, but install at your own risk?
Oki
On Wed, Nov 17, 1999 at 07:07:52AM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
>
>
> Glen S Mehn wrote:
> >
> > Call me silly, but it's right there in the dpkg list when you install.
> > Try apt-get install satan and see what happens.
>
> ss1:~# apt-get install satan
> Updati
Joey Hess wrote:
> You meran like this?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/packages/debconf>dpkg --print-avail satan
> Package: satan
> Priority: optional
...
ss1:~# dpkg --print-avail satan
Package `satan' is not available.
It seems that currently Satan is gone.
Oki
Glen S Mehn wrote:
>
> Call me silly, but it's right there in the dpkg list when you install.
> Try apt-get install satan and see what happens.
ss1:~# apt-get install satan
Updating package status cache...done
Checking system integrity...ok
E: Couldn't find package satan
Call me silly, but it's right there in the dpkg list when you install.
Try apt-get install satan and see what happens.
Regards,
glen
Subject:
Encounter with Satan
Date:
Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:44:11 +0700 (JAVT)
From:
Oki DZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
t is the tarball (after you have gotten
> used to apt-get, tarballs are supposedly something in the past).
>
> Isn't there any interest in "porting" Satan to Debian...? (Or, did I just
> miss something here?).
You meran like this?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/packages/deb
gotten
used to apt-get, tarballs are supposedly something in the past).
Isn't there any interest in "porting" Satan to Debian...? (Or, did I just
miss something here?).
Oki
used to apt-get, tarballs are supposedly
something in the past).
Isn't there any interest in "porting" Satan to Debian...? (Or, did I just
miss something here?).
debian has nmap packaged (and its been installed every one of the 12
reinstalls ive done :) ) which iirc does ever
are supposedly
something in the past).
Isn't there any interest in "porting" Satan to Debian...? (Or, did I just
miss something here?).
Oki
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:52:53PM -0400, Salman Ahmed wrote:
> > "AO" == Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> AO> have you looked into portsentry ?? ( same folks as logcheck )... -
> AO> on my todo list
>
> Is a Debian package (stable or unstable) available for portsentry ? I
> ha
"Salman Ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is a Debian package (stable or unstable) available for portsentry ? I
> haven't been able to find one as yet.
Someone is packaging it (for potato); check the debian-devel archive
if you want to know who that is (I don't remember); I've been using
port
hi ya dwayne
> > what are you guys trying to scan for ???
> > nmap seems to be the one most people use=20
> > http://www.insecure.org/nmap
>
> Yes, but I want to make sure that someone ELSE using satan can't get into
> my sister's box (she wouldn't
> what are you guys trying to scan for ???
>
> nmap seems to be the one most people use
> http://www.insecure.org/nmap
Yes, but I want to make sure that someone ELSE using satan can't get into
my sister's box (she wouldn't like that). I've already used nm
mail, which apache, which ftp, which OS, etc..
have fun
alvin
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:33:23AM -0600, Art Lemasters wrote:
> > While trying to run satan here, I received a _compilation_
> > error message. Have any of you tried satan in potato (as I have)
> > and received the same message (or not)?
>
Yep. I tried to scan some other boxen on my home network, but it wouldn't
run.
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999 at 11:33:23AM -0600, Art Lemasters wrote:
> While trying to run satan here, I received a _compilation_
> error message. Have any of you tried satan in potato (as I have)
> an
While trying to run satan here, I received a _compilation_
error message. Have any of you tried satan in potato (as I have)
and received the same message (or not)?
Art
r so, maybe it
> > is something obvious. :)
>
> That was all, Seth, from running
> /usr/sbin/satan -v
>
> from a superuser.
>
> I'll see what I can find on my own, though, until someone else
> enlightens us. Thanks for the reply.
Err, well, lines 70-90 fro
On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 02:00:58AM -0700, Seth R Arnold wrote:
> Art, check the bug servers -- there might be more information on this.
>
> It might not hurt though to post the surrounding ten lines or so, maybe it
> is something obvious. :)
That was all, Seth, from running
/us
:
>
> ---
> heart:#satan
> syntax error at ./satan line 83, near "<>"
>(Might be a runaway multi-line << string starting on line 78)
> Execution of ./satan aborted due to compilation errors.
>
> ...anyone know anything about this one?
>
---
heart:#satan
syntax error at ./satan line 83, near "<>"
(Might be a runaway multi-line << string starting on line 78)
Execution of ./satan aborted due to compilation errors.
...anyone know a
I have made rules in /etc/hosts.ALLOW to only allow access from
domains I know are supposed to be connecting. Is there anything else I should
do?
Also; I tried to install the SATAN program i heard mentioned to see if
it found any problems with my system. But it wont compile! :(
I got satan
On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Mike Holliday wrote:
> I'm having a slight problem installing Satan..when I go to the reconfig
> script..I'm not sure of the command I've used "sh
> /my/satan/directory/reconfig.sh But it's not moving or showing that it
> is working.
F
try ./reconfig.sh
On 27-Oct-98 Mike Holliday wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm having a slight problem installing Satan..when I go to the reconfig
> script..I'm not sure of the command I've used "sh
> /my/satan/directory/reconfig.sh But it's not moving or show
On Tue, 27 Oct 1998, Mike Holliday wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm having a slight problem installing Satan..when I go to the reconfig
> script..I'm not sure of the command I've used "sh
> /my/satan/directory/reconfig.sh But it's not moving or showing that it
> is wor
Hi,
I'm having a slight problem installing Satan..when I go to the reconfig
script..I'm not sure of the command I've used "sh
/my/satan/directory/reconfig.sh But it's not moving or showing that it
is working.
Mike H.
s Adams
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Debian User
> Subject: Re: SATAN .deb?
>
>
> Thomas Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >it's an essential admin tool for checking your setup.
> >
> > This is the reason why it shouldn't be prepackaged. I really
Thomas Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >it's an essential admin tool for checking your setup.
>
> This is the reason why it shouldn't be prepackaged. I really can't imagine
> anybody concerned about security trusting a prepackaged security scanner.
Wow, I guess we shouldn't be prepackaging
At 14:16 Uhr +0100 15.10.1998, M.C. Vernon wrote:
>it's an essential admin tool for checking your setup.
This is the reason why it shouldn't be prepackaged. I really can't imagine
anybody concerned about security trusting a prepackaged security scanner.
Personally, I wouldn't. That's perhaps be
There is one reason not to use packaged satan.
.deb package contains binaries, those can include Troyan horses etc.
Sure I trust debian developers, but when using satan or some different
security auditing application I want to compile the binary for myself
from pristine sources.
Jozef Skvarcek
for debian-devel. Cheers.
The real problem with packaging satan is that it was never designed to
reside in a FSSTND complient layout. If it had a saner structure, I would
have packaged it long ago.
--
see shy jo
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, M.C. Vernon wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Has anyone packaged this yet? If not then IMHO it should be done -
> it's an essential admin tool for checking your setup.
Unfortunately it is also quite a nasty package for checking someone else's
setup:) I myself agree with you but
Dear all,
Has anyone packaged this yet? If not then IMHO it should be done -
it's an essential admin tool for checking your setup.
Matthew
--
Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo
Steward of the Cambridge Tolkien Society
Selwyn College Computer Support
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/8
Does anyone know the reason why SATAN is not available as a deb
package, even in the contrib or non-free sections? Has anyone been
able to find it as an RPM?
Thanks,
Max
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
I'm trying to get working satan with lynx but when you pick in a link wich
should execute a perl script the browsers ask you for download, I have
tried by removing the /etc/mime-types for perl and it seems it works
partially: It follows the links b
Hello all, I got some problem while compiling satan, at
gulp#perl ./reconfig
.
. every thing is okay, until
checking for all commands
can not find ypcat
can not find ypwhich
please tell me where can I get those..?
furthermore.. when I do "make" as root, I got erro
Hi,
can someone tell me where I can find the right patch to compile
satan1.1.1 on my Debian1.2 ?
TIA
Richard Zoni !e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Via Emilia Ponente 28/3!homepagehttp://www.cs.unibo.it/~zoni
40133 Bologna(BO) ITALY!phone/fax ++39 51 380 327
*Public Key
Has anyone installed/used SATAN on a debian box before? When i tried to
compile it it asked me to copy the 4BSD libraries to teh same directory ...
i dont have these libraries?
Im out like bellbottom trousers,
michael
///\ "Wake up Muttley, your dreamin` again"
c-00
40 matches
Mail list logo
