Colin Telmer wrote: > Unfortunately it is also quite a nasty package for checking someone else's > setup:) I myself agree with you but anytime I have brought it up > elsewhere, there is definitely divided opinion on the package. > Anyway, this question might be better suited for debian-devel. Cheers.
The real problem with packaging satan is that it was never designed to reside in a FSSTND complient layout. If it had a saner structure, I would have packaged it long ago. -- see shy jo
