Hello,
I have upgrade my debian samba domain controller yesterday.
After that I get on both (dc1 and dc2) this error:
Could not get lock /var/lib/apt/lists/lock - open (11: Resource
temporarily unavailable)
I have try to remove the look and list files, reconfigure all installed
packages but the
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 07:19:42AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
[...]
> > my system on the server and the client computes is the same Debian 8.5
>
> Were you ever able to narrow down the issue? I'm able to reproduce the issue
> easily as well just on localhost doing the following on a D
Hi Andrey
> Hello *,
> creating a file in the directory exported by the NFS server
> sometimes returns an error - "resource temporarily unavailable",
> when a client on importing computer is keeping reading that file.
>
> serv:~# cat /etc/exports
> /h
1; done
>
> After a while (it's unpredictable might take up 10 minutes or a few seconds,
> but in average about 2 minutes)
> on the server I get:
> data-t/now.txt: Resource temporarily unavailable
It's likely that the server is granting the client a read delegation
on the file, w
Hello *,
creating a file in the directory exported by the NFS server
sometimes returns an error - "resource temporarily unavailable",
when a client on importing computer is keeping reading that file.
serv:~# cat /etc/exports
/home/me/data-t cli(ro,sync,no_subtree_ch
Sorry I wasn't clear: I was just talking about the errno -- we still
> > > haven't an idea how it comes about. The manpage is but an approximation
> > > to reality
>
> you are right, it's EAGAIN
> "open $currname w" -> couldn't open ../..
page is but an approximation
> > to reality
you are right, it's EAGAIN
"open $currname w" -> couldn't open ../../current/south/S_DAQconnMod.txt:
errorCode=POSIX EAGAIN {resource temporarily unavailable}
although it's only confirmation to what has been already po
>
> > It happens to any file on any ext4 partition which are locally mounted.
> >
> > Is there a way to find out at least which part of the system is responsible
> > for 'resource temporarily unavailable'.
> >
> >
> What's the output of &#
open("tst.tst", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC, 0666) = 5
> > ...
> >
> > as it was expected - nothing miraculous
>
> OK. So it seems there's another path open() --> EWOULDBLOCK in the kernel.
> That would be a chance to read some kernel sources... I fear
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 09:03:30PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-06-17 13:31 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > OK. I've got one more hint. Reading through the open(2) man page
> > (assuming it is really open what's failing on you -- what evi
manpage is but an approximation
to reality :-)
[...]
> > - have a look at the Emacs sources
> >
>
> there is nothing particular about emacs
> it my have been 'bash' or anything that uses libc
I wasnt implying that: any of the apps you've caught complaini
ULDBLOCK is #defined as EAGAIN in asm-generic/errno.h.
Also they are always the same in the glibc, regardless of the operating
system kernel.
> Lo and behold, a small test program on my box reveals that
> both at least translate to 'Resource temporarily unavailable':
>
> #incl
happens to any file on any ext4 partition which are locally mounted.
>>
>> Is there a way to find out at least which part of the system is responsible
>> for 'resource temporarily unavailable'.
>>
>>
> What's the output of 'df -i'?
way to find out at least which part of the system is responsible
> for 'resource temporarily unavailable'.
>
>
What's the output of 'df -i'? If you create lots of files, maybe you ran
out of inodes?
Mart
--
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
--- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.
iate ioctl for device)
write(5, "test\n", 5) = 5
close(5)= 0
...
as it was expected - nothing miraculous
> > how it could be when I tried to save a file from Emacs and got 'Resource
> > temporarily unavailable'
> >
ing it through strace might shake
out whether they do any fcntl behind the scenes...
> how it could be when I tried to save a file from Emacs and got 'Resource
> temporarily unavailable'
>
> well, I included all open(2) errors in your test:
>
> int nerr[]={EACCES,EEXI
e mounted?
> > >
> >
> > It happens to any file on any ext4 partition which are locally mounted.
> >
> > Is there a way to find out at least which part of the system is responsible
> > for 'resource temporarily unavailable'.
>
> OK. I've got one mo
which are locally mounted.
>
> Is there a way to find out at least which part of the system is responsible
> for 'resource temporarily unavailable'.
OK. I've got one more hint. Reading through the open(2) man page
(assuming it is really open what's failing on you -- w
lo list,
> > > > 'open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error:
> > > > couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable
> > > > either in background process or interactively (ex: in Emacs when
> > > > tryi
;open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error:
> > > couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable
> > > either in background process or interactively (ex: in Emacs when
> > > trying to save a file).
> >
> > Are yo
Sven Joachim gmx.de> writes:
>
> On 2016-06-16 21:46 +0600, Andrew P. Cherepenko wrote:
>
> > Hello list,
> > 'open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error:
> > couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable
&g
On 2016-06-16 21:46 +0600, Andrew P. Cherepenko wrote:
> Hello list,
> 'open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error:
> couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable
> either in background process or interactively (ex: in Emac
Hello list,
'open()' for creating file sometimes returns an error:
couldn't open "myfile.txt": resource temporarily unavailable
either in background process or interactively (ex: in Emacs when
trying to save a file).
system: Debian 8.5
with kernel: linux
On 12/31/2011 11:38 AM, David Baron wrote:
> On Friday 04 Tevet 5772 17:28:15 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
> wrote:
>>> Get a slew of these immediately at bootup.
>>> Afterwards, it works fine.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What may be causing this?
>>
>> Why didn't you ask Google before asking h
On Friday 04 Tevet 5772 17:28:15 debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org
wrote:
> > Get a slew of these immediately at bootup.
> > Afterwards, it works fine.
> >
> >
> >
> > What may be causing this?
>
> Why didn't you ask Google before asking here? It's not really fair to
> ask others to d
On 12/30/2011 2:37 AM, David Baron wrote:
> Get a slew of these immediately at bootup.
> Afterwards, it works fine.
>
> What may be causing this?
Why didn't you ask Google before asking here? It's not really fair to
ask others to do your homework, given the information you seek is
readily availa
Get a slew of these immediately at bootup.
Afterwards, it works fine.
What may be causing this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201112301037.20044.d_b
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:29:02PM +, Alex Kent wrote:
> So I'm wondering, if this package isn't going to make it into the
> official debian lenny sources - what is the best way to proceed?
Thats what backport is for, check out
http://www.backports.org/dokuwiki/doku.php
HTH, Oli
--
To UNS
Hello,
I ran into the "send of 32768 bytes failed with errno=11 Resource
temporarily unavailable" bug and was pleased to see that this has been
fixed and updated in the 3.0.2 and above versions of the package:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503467
Because th
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fine except for this issue. It seems to be related to sloppy code in the program, one of the only error's I could find was the "[e410] read(6, 0xafae77c3, 1) = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable) <
0.29>"Since many of you are experts in this type of thing I th
Hi there,
SYS: Debian 3.1, kernel 2.4.27-2-generic alpha GNU/Linux, clamd daemon 0.88.2
When I got in to work this morning my server wiould not allow me (or others)
access. Even when I
logged into the console and tried to do an `ls` it responded with
(35)Resource temporarily unavailable
On Saturday 28 August 2004 03:11, Phil Thomson wrote:
> TIA. This is my first time installing Debian, and I'm not a Linux wizard at
> the best of times. Some of these questions may appear basic, but I'm just
> trying to learn how to do this stuff. You can reply to me offlist if you
> want.
Just t
Phil Thomson wrote:
Hi all,
Working on a network install of Debian, but I'm having trouble getting
the network to come up. My NIC is a D-Link DFE-530TX, the driver for
which is rtl8139. When I run dhclient, I get "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource
temporarily unavailable". The list archives
Phil Thomson wrote:
Hi all,
Working on a network install of Debian, but I'm having trouble getting
the network to come up. My NIC is a D-Link DFE-530TX, the driver for
which is rtl8139. When I run dhclient, I get "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource
temporarily unavailable". The list archives
Phil Thomson wrote:
Hi all,
Working on a network install of Debian, but I'm having trouble getting
the network to come up. My NIC is a D-Link DFE-530TX, the driver for
which is rtl8139. When I run dhclient, I get "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource
temporarily unavailable". The list archiv
Hi all,
Working on a network install of Debian, but I'm having trouble getting the
network to come up. My NIC is a D-Link DFE-530TX, the driver for which is
rtl8139. When I run dhclient, I get "SIOCSIFFLAGS: Resource temporarily
unavailable". The list archives suggest that it h
On Sun, 08 Sep 2002 12:19:21 PDT, Alex Withers writes:
>On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Nicos Gollan wrote:
>As it turns out that was it, in a way. I had a line in my .bashrc that
>went like so: PAGER=`which less`. For some reason this would cause a
>momentary explosion in the number of "which" processes.
r became of it?
The last thread was started on 2002-08-23 by Adam Galant ("fork:
Resource temporarily unavailable").
--
Embedded Linux -- True multitasking!
TWO TOASTS AT THE SAME TIME!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 12:19:21PM -0700, Alex Withers wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> > We had this on the list some days ago. Run ps ax and see if you've got a
> > huge quantity of (defunct) processes.
>
> As it turns out that was it, in a way. I had a line in my .bashrc tha
another xterm it hangs for a few seconds
> > before spitting out the message: "bash: fork: Resource temporarily
> > unavailable".
>
> We had this on the list some days ago. Run ps ax and see if you've got a
> huge quantity of (defunct) processes.
As it turns ou
Nicos Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We had this on the list some days ago. Run ps ax and see if you've
> got a huge quantity of (defunct) processes.
I must have missed that thread; what ever became of it? I've recently
noticed that my server has had a large number of defunct processes on
g out the message: "bash: fork: Resource temporarily
> unavailable".
We had this on the list some days ago. Run ps ax and see if you've got a
huge quantity of (defunct) processes.
--
Embedded Linux -- True multitasking!
TWO TOASTS AT THE SAME TIME!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
Alex Withers said:
>
> Hello, I've recently installed Debian 3.0 on a home machine. After
> logging into the machine through xdm I open an xterm with no trouble but
> when I try to spawn another xterm it hangs for a few seconds before
> spitting out the message: "bash: f
Hello, I've recently installed Debian 3.0 on a home machine. After
logging into the machine through xdm I open an xterm with no trouble but
when I try to spawn another xterm it hangs for a few seconds before
spitting out the message: "bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable&
oday someone
> told me that i hsould try to do this:ifconfig eth0 up
> i did that but it gave me this:
> SIOCSIFFLAGS: resource temporarily unavailable
> like i said previously, i tried installing mandrake, and it did work, it
> also works with windows..just not with debian..
..today someone told me that i hsould try to do this:
>ifconfig eth0 up
> i did that but it gave me this:
> SIOCSIFFLAGS: resource temporarily unavailable
> like i said previously, i tried installing mandrake, and it did work, it
> also works with windows..just not with debia
but it gave me this:
SIOCSIFFLAGS: resource temporarily unavailable
like i said previously, i tried installing mandrake, and it did work, it
also works with windows..just not with debian..i have a dynamic IP as well
so i tried using pump or dhcpcd but nothing changed
thank you for any help
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 04:31:54PM -0600, Pete Harlan wrote:
> > I leave gnomeicu running all the time and my process table get filled
> > with defunct gnomeicu processes. I have to stop/restart gnomeicu to get
> > rid of them.
>
> I've had this "fork: ..." message happen when I had only around 30
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:08:54PM -0800, Angus D Madden wrote:
> Karsten M. Self, Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:28:18AM -0800:
> >
> > For a fork, I'd suspect you're out of user processes, though checking
> > other resource limits (generally memory and filehandles) is
> adviseable.
> >
> > There are
> "Pete" == Pete Harlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pete> Does anyone know how to increase the number of allowed
Pete> processes?
if you are running a 2.2 series kernel, you have to recompile the
kernel after tweaking a header file.
it's been a while, but I think you only have to change on
Karsten M. Self, Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:28:18AM -0800:
>
> For a fork, I'd suspect you're out of user processes, though checking
> other resource limits (generally memory and filehandles) is adviseable.
>
> There are hard-compiled limits of 256 user, and 512 system, processes,
> in the 2.2.x ke
on Sun, Mar 03, 2002, Balazs Javor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I try to ssh from one of my Woody boxes into the other
> (using OpenSSH) I am able to connect but I get the following message:
>
> bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> The same m
On Sunday 03 March 2002 23:31, Pete Harlan wrote:
> > I leave gnomeicu running all the time and my process table get filled
> > with defunct gnomeicu processes. I have to stop/restart gnomeicu to get
> > rid of them.
>
> I've had this "fork: ..." message happen when I had only around 300
> processe
> I leave gnomeicu running all the time and my process table get filled
> with defunct gnomeicu processes. I have to stop/restart gnomeicu to get
> rid of them.
I've had this "fork: ..." message happen when I had only around 300
processes running. /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max is the only relevant
Hi,
Yes, indeed there have been a huge number of defunct sh processes...
It works now.
Many thanks again!
best regards,
Balazs
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:52:24AM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:16:39PM +0100, Balazs Javor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is the output of free:
>>
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:16:39PM +0100, Balazs Javor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the output of free:
>
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:222788 204144 18644 0 6984 83512
> -/+ buffers/cache: 113648 109140
Hi,
This is the output of free:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:222788 204144 18644 0 6984 83512
-/+ buffers/cache: 113648 109140
Swap: 747012 93416 653596
>From this it seems to me that I s
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 14:12:17 +0100, Balazs Javor wrote:
>
>Any ideas why this happens and how I could solve this?
>
You're out of memory. Add some swap.
--
Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~.
http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/The Choice /V\
Hi,
When I try to ssh from one of my Woody boxes into the other
(using OpenSSH) I am able to connect but I get the following message:
bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
The same message then appears each time I try to run something
that tries to fork a new shell e.g. less
Any ideas
antom processes when the user had already logged
out)
Rob...
- Original Message -
From: "Andrei Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Imre Vida" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 5:44 AM
Subject: Re: bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavaila
As a different post has suggested, it probably is a mixture of process and
file table problem. The best solution would have been to reboot the
system, and then pay close attention to it over the next few days to see
how it goes. Also, as some processes die and before new ones spawn, you
may be able
on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:06:07PM +0200, Imre Vida ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> one more bit of info:
> I can ftp to the machine.
> This works absolutely fine.
> Funny.
Resources come in several flavors. I'd suspect process table or open
files. Note that some daemons run without spawning new
one more bit of info:
I can ftp to the machine.
This works absolutely fine.
Funny.
imre
Andrei,
thanks for your response
> I've seen this before, and it has got something to do with too many
> processes running on the system, eating up the file descriptor table. We
> had a system in the office that had 50-some instances of a process
> running, and were getting this message (I believ
> Hi,
>
> i seem to have a problem with my Debian box.
>
> When i try to login to it using ssh it accepts
> the login but then instead of the bash prompt
> i get the following erromsg:
>
> bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> This has n
Hi,
i seem to have a problem with my Debian box.
When i try to login to it using ssh it accepts
the login but then instead of the bash prompt
i get the following erromsg:
bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
This has never happened before and i didn't
anything i
Wow,
I just mailed the list with the wrong error (and
it's still probably spelled wrong, but I have to mail you from windoze until my
DSL works). Anyway, the error in the subject of this message pops up when
trying to configure eth0, hindering me from using my DSL card. What could
be wro
Quoting aphro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On 24 Feb 2000, "F.P. Groeneveld" wrote:
>
> derk >Okay, you are 100% correct. nmbd had respawned a zillion times. Killing
> derk >them solved the problem. Still, I don't understand why logins through
> ssh
> derk >are not affected? Also, I couldn't find where
On 24 Feb 2000, "F.P. Groeneveld" wrote:
derk >Okay, you are 100% correct. nmbd had respawned a zillion times. Killing
derk >them solved the problem. Still, I don't understand why logins through ssh
derk >are not affected? Also, I couldn't find where ulimit is set. Anyone?
i think 256 is just the
aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: *I* can't think of anything else that'd cause this on a lightly loaded
: machine(I've seen it without ulimits on a machine say under a syn flood
: attack or something) so if its not ulimits im 'fraid i cant offer any
: further advice :/
Thanks, it WAS ulimit afte
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 01:08:21AM +0100, F.P. Groeneveld wrote:
: if its only when you use su it sounds like resource limits. the
: command is ulimit -u not ulimits -u. i have not touched resource
: limits yet on debian (have not got around to it) but u
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, F.P. Groeneveld wrote:
derk >I don't run ulimits... ulimits -u : command not found. As for a hard limit
derk >on processes... If I log in as root (as opposed to su), I have no problem
derk >whatsoever. Only when I su to root do I have this problem?
try ulimit -u (not plural)
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 01:08:21AM +0100, F.P. Groeneveld wrote:
> I don't run ulimits... ulimits -u : command not found. As for a hard limit
> on processes... If I log in as root (as opposed to su), I have no problem
> whatsoever. Only when I su to root do I have this problem?
>
if its only whe
> are you using ulimits? i dont know if sash has builtin resource limits,
> check ulimit -u, for most systems it should say unlimited, unless it is
> set by you(or another admin) for most of my systems i set it to 12 which
> is pretty tight. how many processes are running on the system? if its a
>
rk >I'm logging in remotely, using ssh to a normal user on my box, and su to
derk >root. Then, whatever command I type, I get:
derk >
derk >fork failed: Resource temporarily unavailable
derk >
derk >This happens both as root and as sashroot (root using sash instead of
de
I'm having a very weird problem. I'm running potato, upgraded to the latest
version yesterday evening.
I'm logging in remotely, using ssh to a normal user on my box, and su to
root. Then, whatever command I type, I get:
fork failed: Resource temporarily unavailable
This happens b
E.L. Meijer \(Eric\) wrote:
> It looks as though your system runs out of pid's (unlikely), or you hit
> your maximum number of processes (not impossible). What does ulimit -a
> say about your max user processes? How many processes are running?
> (try top, or `ps ax').
>
> ps ax | wc -l
>
> Eric
>
> I've e Debian 2.0 frozen host with X windows and fvwm95.
> Now when I run a program and some windows are opened often I'm
> obtainig:
> xterm: Error 29, errno 11: Resource temporarily unavailable
> or when I attempting to run xterm:
> bash: fork: Resource t
I've e Debian 2.0 frozen host with X windows and fvwm95.
Now when I run a program and some windows are opened often I'm
obtainig:
xterm: Error 29, errno 11: Resource temporarily unavailable
or when I attempting to run xterm:
bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
and so on..
I recently upgraded a computer from kernel v 2.0.29 to 2.0.33. It has a
Promise UDMA controller card, and the patch is written against 2.0.33.
The harddrive now works fine. However, I get the message SIOCSIFFLAGS:
Resource Temporarily Unavailable when the system tries to set up the
network
81 matches
Mail list logo
