On Thu, Aug 15, 2024 at 01:13:15PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
Except the original plan did not hold water, even at the time.
yes, that's why Reiser continued to add non-traditional filesystem
features right up to the end. and the more it diverged from a
traditional filesystem, the less like
dividual files, it would exhibit ridiculously poor performance
> on every other filesystem and OS, and writing a database only for reiserfs
> seemed overly limiting. Remember reiserfs was always a research project, and
> never quite done;
> reiser4 pushed these concepts further (e.g.
On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 03:46:45PM +0100, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
Off-topic really, but could you explain (or point to an explanation)
how applications could be redesigned for this 'new paradigm'. I ask
because I used reiserfs because of (a) journalling and (b) handling
t; to be redesigned in order to take advantage of the new paradigm, and
> then wouldn't work with any other filesystem or OS.
Off-topic really, but could you explain (or point to an explanation)
how applications could be redesigned for this 'new paradigm'. I ask
because I used rei
w paradigm, and then
wouldn't work with any other filesystem or OS. As a side effect, it
provided the benfits of a journalling filesystem when there weren't a
lot of good options for that on linux. It was briefly popular so people
could avoid lengthy fsck's, not generally becau
August 13, 2024 at 2:14 AM, "Thomas Schmitt" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i think i found documentation about effective storage of very small
>
> files in ext4:
>
> https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Disk_Layout#Inline_Data
>
>
> https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/197633/how-to-use
Hi,
i think i found documentation about effective storage of very small
files in ext4:
https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Disk_Layout#Inline_Data
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/197633/how-to-use-the-new-ext4-inline-data-feature-storing-data-directly-in-the-inode
https://m
Hi
We are still using Reiserfs for its space optimisation.
Very optimised for a lot of little files and its shrink feature is better
than with xfs
The file system is more resilient with power outage per exemple than others
So with linux 6.6 any way possible to load the module ?
Le lun. 12 août
On 8/12/24 04:09, Wesley wrote:
Most recent years we keep using the ext4 filesystem.
But years ago before ext4 we used the ReiserFS filesystem.
In my memory ReiserFS was a good choice for our application (many small files).
Do you anybody still use ReiserFS today? How about it compares to ext4
On 12 Aug 2024 18:17 +1000, from curmudg...@telaman.net.au (David):
>> Do you anybody still use ReiserFS today? How about it compares to
>> ext4?
>
> Is it even being maintained these days?
Per Wikipedia:
ReiserFS 3 <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReiserFS>: "
Hi,
Wesley wrote:
> In my memory ReiserFS was a good choice for our application (many small
> files).
Yes, that was its main strength.
Possibly ext4 can economize on very small files, too.
man 1 chattr mentions:
"A file with the 'N' attribute set indicates that the f
On Mon, 2024-08-12 at 08:09 +, Wesley wrote:
> Most recent years we keep using the ext4 filesystem.
> But years ago before ext4 we used the ReiserFS filesystem.
> In my memory ReiserFS was a good choice for our application (many
> small files).
> Do you anybody still use Reis
Most recent years we keep using the ext4 filesystem.
But years ago before ext4 we used the ReiserFS filesystem.
In my memory ReiserFS was a good choice for our application (many small files).
Do you anybody still use ReiserFS today? How about it compares to ext4?
Thanks.
Hi.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 03:33:34PM +0100, Bernard van de Koppel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to enable reiserfs for the various systems we are moving to
> buster.
>
> In the previous version ( the config for reiserfs was set to
> "CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=m
Hi,
I would like to enable reiserfs for the various systems we are moving to
buster.
In the previous version ( the config for reiserfs was set to
"CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=m" in /boot/config-3.16.0-4-amd64) in debian 8.11.
In Buster, this is set to "# CONFIG_REISERFS_FS is not set&q
uest (and all such systems) from
> > > ReiserFS to EXT3/4? Hans is in prison. Reiser4 still isn't in
> > > mainline. The number of eyes currently on Reiser3 code can easily be
> > > counted on one person's fingers and toes, maybe just fingers...
> >
&
On Sun, 08 May 2011 14:29:12 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 5/8/2011 7:44 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> Yesterday I updated the kernel to 2.6.38-2 on wheezy and now I get (at
>> a random basis) a warning about the ReiserFS filesystem "is not clean"
>> when booting.
On 5/8/2011 7:44 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Hello,
Yesterday I updated the kernel to 2.6.38-2 on wheezy and now I get (at a
random basis) a warning about the ReiserFS filesystem "is not clean" when
booting.
Despite the boot message, there are no more indications of a filesystem
corruption
Hello,
Yesterday I updated the kernel to 2.6.38-2 on wheezy and now I get (at a
random basis) a warning about the ReiserFS filesystem "is not clean" when
booting.
Despite the boot message, there are no more indications of a filesystem
corruption and indeed, the system has been al
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686
hello,
I have upgraded kernel to 2.6.32-2-686 from 2.6.26-2-686.
After that, when I boot my laptop (debian lenny) I get the error about no write
access to /home.
It's mounted with rw options, reiserfs and it's encrypted from
/dev/mapper/dat-h
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-2-686
hello,
I have upgraded kernel to 2.6.32-2-686 from 2.6.26-2-686.
After that, when I boot my laptop (debian lenny) I get the error about no write
access to /home.
It's mounted with rw options, reiserfs and it's encrypted from
/dev/mapper/dat-h
On Sunday 22 November 2009 02:16:46 Ogya Chief wrote:
> One partition on my linux box with reiserfs is corrupt and I am trying to
> get it fixed. I ran the following command: reiserfsck --rebuild-sb
> /dev/sdb2.
Well, that was wrong. When dealing with ReiserFS, *ALWAYS* run reiserf
One partition on my linux box with reiserfs is corrupt and I am trying to get
it fixed. I ran the following command:
reiserfsck --rebuild-sb /dev/sdb2.
The report I got indicates that either I have a corrupt journal or I have
changed the start of the partition table editor.
It prompted me
Hi
I have a machine with debian 3.1 (sarge) and kernel 2.6.8-3-686-smp.
Today suddenly al process started to block and i get this:
Jun 30 01:00:12 localhost kernel: REISERFS: panic (device sdb1):
journal-1413: journal_mark_dirty: j_len (1024) is too big
Jun 30 01:00:12 localhost kernel
Hi
I have a machine running debian 3.1 (sarge) with kernel
2.6.8-3-686-smp. Today suddenly all proccess started to block an i get
this:
Jun 30 01:00:12 localhost kernel: REISERFS: panic (device sdb1):
journal-1413: journal_mark_dirty: j_len (1024) is too big
Jun 30 01:00:12 localhost kernel:
Jun
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 07:22:40PM -0800, Joe Brenner wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Reiserfs = designed by one person who has had some kind of problems (I
> > haven't looked into it). If damage occurs (e.g. unclean shutdown), may
> >
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Joe Brenner wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Reiserfs = designed by one person who has had some kind of problems (I
> > haven't looked into it). If damage occurs (e.g. unclean shutdown), may
> > not be able
On Jan 19, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
But all of that still gives me no reason to change all of my ext2
partitions to something else.
I decided to change the first time I had a server down for an hour
because it was waiting for the on-boot fsck to finish... :)
--
To UNSUBSC
On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:45 PM, Jimmy Wu wrote:
On Jan 18, 2008 4:27 PM, Damon L. Chesser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
xfs sure does copy and delete really large files faster - I do use it
for video at home.
How big do files have to be before one starts to notice the advantages
of XFS?
In my exp
On Jan 18, 2008, at 1:11 PM, Jimmy Wu wrote:
(4) ReiserFS can be flaky on a system crash.
I haven't found it to be flaky on system crashes. I have found it to
be extremely unforgiving of disk corruption and IDE bus problems. I
was able to recover the data with reiserfsck, but it t
Joe Brenner wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Reiserfs = designed by one person who has had some kind of problems (I
haven't looked into it). If damage occurs (e.g. unclean shutdown), may
not be able to fix the damage and loses data.
I've been using resier
Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Reiserfs = designed by one person who has had some kind of problems (I
> haven't looked into it). If damage occurs (e.g. unclean shutdown), may
> not be able to fix the damage and loses data.
I've been using resierfs for
ed message "Your system is
>--} TOO SLOW to play this"?
I can answer these two from experiences of laptops and desktops. I have only
ever used ext3 except on one occasion back in 2001 where I had one partition
ReiserFS for a short time. It didn't give me any problem, but I did
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:32:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > > (8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
> >
> > no to either
> > /boot should not be a single partition by itself..
> > it is part of /bin, /lib
To the other Mr. Johnson, sorry for the double, I botched the
reply/reply to list distinction there.
On Jan 19, 2008 12:27 PM, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 01/19/08 13:44, Curt Howland wrote:
> > On Saturday 19 January 2008, Jan Willem Stumpel was heard to say:
> >> Step 6: type tun
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:27:23PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 01/19/08 13:44, Curt Howland wrote:
> > If I may interject, creating the journal just creates a blank file.
>
> So when does the journaling begin? At remount?
Perhaps on the next write once it is mounted as ext3? When the journ
Curt Howland wrote:
> If I may interject, creating the journal just creates a blank
> file.
This would explain why creating the journal does not seem to take
any time. But "strings" showed that there was a lot of stuff (at
least lots of filenames) in it. Perhaps the journal is *created*
as a blan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/08 13:44, Curt Howland wrote:
> On Saturday 19 January 2008, Jan Willem Stumpel was heard to say:
>> Step 6: type tune2fs -j /dev/hda5. The journal was created
>> instantaneously (I'd expected this to take a long time.
>> but i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 January 2008, Jan Willem Stumpel was heard to say:
> Step 6: type tune2fs -j /dev/hda5. The journal was created
> instantaneously (I'd expected this to take a long time.
> but it did not).
If I may interject, creating th
Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> Some steps may have been unnecessary, but it seems I have a
> working ext3 system now. It is really easy. The real smoke test
> will come, of course, when I pull the plug. Will do this now; if
> you do not hear from me, the test will have failed. Thanks to all
> who res
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Step 1: Get root privileges.
> Step 2: Type tune2fs -j /dev/whatever
> Step 3: Remount the filesystem ext3...
I did this, and indeed it was amazingly easy. On a partition of
about 24 G (well, this is an *old* disk!) a file /.journal of 128
M (indeed much less than 1%) was cr
On Jan 19, 2008 9:39 AM, Andrew Sackville-West
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:35:25PM +0100, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
> ...
> >
> > But sometimes bugs in applications can cause a complete freeze of
> > X, incl. keyboard and mouse. It happens to me about once a year,
> > un
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:35:25PM +0100, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
...
>
> But sometimes bugs in applications can cause a complete freeze of
> X, incl. keyboard and mouse. It happens to me about once a year,
> unfortunately also yesterday evening. In such a case there is
> nothing you can do but
ist
> of "advantages" is very short, and they are mostly advantages over
> Reiserfs and other non-ext2 systems, not advantages over ext2.
ext2 and 3 are 100% identical save for the journal. ext2 is just as
unsafe as ext3, with ext2 perhaps being less safe due to the total
lac
On Jan 19, 2008 7:17 AM, Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ext3 = ext2 + metadata(default) journaling. Therefore slower than ext2.
> But all of that still gives me no reason to change all of my ext2
> partitions to something else.
ext3 isn't noticably slower for user-environments,
stratingly
conflicting advice. For example, an article from
debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
pedia article on ext3. It gives
> a rather long list of "disadvantages". One of them ("No
> checksumming in journal") even sounds pretty frightening. The list
> of "advantages" is very short, and they are mostly advantages over
> Reiserfs and other non-ext2 sys
) even sounds pretty frightening. The list
of "advantages" is very short, and they are mostly advantages over
Reiserfs and other non-ext2 systems, not advantages over ext2.
But sometimes bugs in applications can cause a complete freeze of
X, incl. keyboard and mouse. It happens to me abou
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 06:47:29 +0900
David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ext3 is best if you are dealing with a mixture of both and has the
> added security factor of defaulting to Ext2 if it fails. Although I
> have never had reason to find out.
I'm in the habit of using buggy and crash-prone hardw
y
> conflicting advice. For example, an article from
> debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. But other
> sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
> crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
> on the performa
Damon L. Chesser wrote:
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Wow, thanks for the many quick responses. I'm doing a "group reply"
to the list by quoting everyone in one message. Not sure if this is
top-posting, bottom-posting, or conversational-posting, but if this
goes against mailing list etiquette, please tell m
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Wow, thanks for the many quick responses. I'm doing a "group reply"
to the list by quoting everyone in one message. Not sure if this is
top-posting, bottom-posting, or conversational-posting, but if this
goes against mailing list etiquette, please tell me/flame me gently,
and I
to wipe it and either shrink its partition and
replace it with XP or possibly give all the space to Debian,
repartitioning/reinstalling as necessary. I hope my HD won't complain
about that.
> Sure. But who the hell uses JFS on a laptop?
:-) Some of the forums google turned up had pe
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 05:32:25PM -0500, Allan Wind wrote:
> On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > > (8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
> >
> > no to either
> > /boot should not be a single partition by itself..
> > it is part of /bin, /lib
On 2008-01-18T16:11:17-0500, Jimmy Wu wrote:
> (1) ext3 mounts and unmounts slowly, resulting in increased boot times.
I use ext3 on same hardware, and (clean) mounts do not take any
significant time:
[ 19.209034] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
[ 19.209039] VFS: Mounted
Quoth Hugo Vanwoerkom:
>
> ext2. Never have used any other.
I seriously hope that this was a joke...
Aleks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ble to corruption on a
> crash/power outage than the other file systems.
That is correct, and a reason to avoid it.
> Then, people disagree on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
Then again, those people would even disagree on the current local weather.
> In an attempt to get some
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:32:25 -0500
Allan Wind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > > (8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than
> > > > ext3?
> >
> > no to either
> > /boot should not be a single partition by itself..
> > it
On 2008-01-18T14:05:25-0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > > (8) Is there any advantage to using ext2 for /boot rather than ext3?
>
> no to either
> /boot should not be a single partition by itself..
> it is part of /bin, /lib, /sbin /etc ... which is the rootfs
>
> even if /boot is fin
day or more )
- it will/might take forever ( over a day or more ) to format 500MB or 1
terabyte fs or larger
- it will take forever ( even longer ) to restore the 1 terabyte of data
- "times" are based on past experience for say P4-2Ghz w/ 1GB of memory or
equivalent
> > (4) Re
rom
debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
In an attempt to get some definitive answers, I threw tog
Jimmy Wu wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to decide on which file systems to use for a Debian
install on a personal laptop. It's a Thinkpad T61 with one 160 GB HD.
Hello Jimmy,
I have found:
Xfs is best for large file sizes, if that's what you are dealing with -
graphics, and the ilk;
rom
debian-administration touts XFS as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
In an attempt to get some definitive answers, I threw tog
uts XFS as the best in performance. But other
sites mention that XFS may be more vulnerable to corruption on a
crash/power outage than the other file systems. Then, people disagree
on the performance of ext3 vs ReiserFS.
In an attempt to get some definitive answers, I threw together some of
the
keeping the drive
> unmounted and storing data elsewhere until I can get this mess
> untangled... :-/
>
> TIA & HAND,
> Jacob
>
>
Hey,
This is not really a recommended solution, but I have had some success
in the past with manually re-creating lvm partitions and reise
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:52:14PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> Anybody know a way I can get most of these files back without having to
> manually rename and reorganize everything? I'm keeping the drive
> unmounted and storing data elsewhere until I can get this mess
> untangled... :-/
Just pull
Howdy list,
So, I did something stupid. (Again.) My desktop went down, but I needed
a backup off of it for a different computer on the lan, so I took out
the lvm drive and put it in my other backup server. Only problem was,
the lvm drive I put in and the lvm drive I pulled from the working
ba
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:14:27AM -0400, Roby wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > Andrei Popescu wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > What happens when a Windows system encounters that filesystem, though?
> > Doesn't scandisk sack it?
I wouldn't want to find out ...
> The posix option for vf
Paul Johnson wrote:
> Andrei Popescu wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> posted to gmane.linux.debian.user:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:28:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
>>> > You'll lose the permission bits and owner/group, etc. (Maybe even
>>> > filename case, but I'm not sure). U
Andrei Popescu wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to gmane.linux.debian.user:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:28:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> > You'll lose the permission bits and owner/group, etc. (Maybe even
>> > filename case, but I'm not sure). Use tar if all you have is fat32
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:28:36AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > You'll lose the permission bits and owner/group, etc. (Maybe even
> > filename case, but I'm not sure). Use tar if all you have is fat32.
>
> If it's VFAT, it'll retain case, though you can't have two files with the
> same name s
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 04:27:53AM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote in Article
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
> gmane.linux.debian.user:
> > On 4/4/07, Johannes Wiedersich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
>
> >
> > OK, but if copy the file to fat32 partion, any problem
gt;> you have good backups!)
>> - rsync all your data back to the new ext3-partition
>> - adjust your /etc/fstab (replace reiserfs by ext3)
>> - cross your fingers and reboot
>
>
> OK, but if copy the file to fat32 partion, any problem ?
Yes. Fat32 lacks filesystem p
S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote in Article
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
> My system now runing on reiserfs partation, i want to make it ext3 without
> reinstalling debian. any idea ?
The Hard Disk Upgrade HOWTO probably provides the best method. You will
need
free space
>> > - reformat your partition to ext3 (all data will be lost, so make sure
>> > you have good backups!)
>> > - rsync all your data back to the new ext3-partition
>> > - adjust your /etc/fstab (replace reiserfs by ext3)
>> > - cross your fin
Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You'll lose the permission bits and owner/group, etc. (Maybe even
> > > filename case, but I'm not sure). Use tar if all you have is
> > > fat32.
> >
> > Note too that FAT32 maximum file size is 4GB.
> >
>
> Also might want to note that you WILL
than
On 4/5/07, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/5/07, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Also might want to note that you WILL lose filename case, FAT32 only
> allows for lowercase characters in filenames.
Thanks, i am going to try now, i will inform you t
'rescue system' (I recommend knoppix) from CD or usb
> > > > - mount both your partition and the one with the free space
> > > > - rsync -avx your data to the free space
> > > > - reformat your partition to ext3 (all data will be lost, so make
sure
> &
Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> Also might want to note that you WILL lose filename case, FAT32 only
> allows for lowercase characters in filenames.
That would only be the filename of the tar-file, so it doesn't really
mater.
Johannes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
gt; > > > - mount both your partition and the one with the free space
> > > > - rsync -avx your data to the free space
> > > > - reformat your partition to ext3 (all data will be lost, so make sure
> > > > you have good backups!)
> > >
Kushal Kumaran wrote:
> On 4/5/07, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You'll lose the permission bits and owner/group, etc. (Maybe even
> filename case, but I'm not sure). Use tar if all you have is fat32.
seconded.
If it's of importance also check the maximum file size of yo
- reformat your partition to ext3 (all data will be lost, so make sure
> > > you have good backups!)
> > > - rsync all your data back to the new ext3-partition
> > > - adjust your /etc/fstab (replace reiserfs by ext3)
> > > - cross your fingers and reboot
> &g
xt3-partition
> - adjust your /etc/fstab (replace reiserfs by ext3)
> - cross your fingers and reboot
OK, but if copy the file to fat32 partion, any problem ?
You'll lose the permission bits and owner/group, etc. (Maybe even
filename case, but I'm not sure). Use tar if all you
ee space
- rsync -avx your data to the free space
- reformat your partition to ext3 (all data will be lost, so make sure
you have good backups!)
- rsync all your data back to the new ext3-partition
- adjust your /etc/fstab (replace reiserfs by ext3)
- cross your fingers and reboot
OK, but if
S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 21:14 +0600, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
>> > My system now runing on reiserfs partation, i want to make it ext3
>> > without reinstalling debi
On 4/4/07, Greg Folkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 21:14 +0600, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> My system now runing on reiserfs partation, i want to make it ext3
> without reinstalling debian. any idea ?
You have to have a spare partition large enough to
On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 21:14 +0600, S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu) wrote:
> My system now runing on reiserfs partation, i want to make it ext3
> without reinstalling debian. any idea ?
You have to have a spare partition large enough to handle each
partition's data in a tar.gz file.
Do you ha
My system now runing on reiserfs partation, i want to make it ext3 without
reinstalling debian. any idea ?
--
S. M. Ibrahim (Lavlu)
Web Application Developer
somewherein...
Home page: http://lavluda.tripod.com
Blog: http://lavluda.tk
Yahoo!! ID: lavluda MSN ID: lavluda Skype : lavluda
Alejandro,
Esta lista es para discusiones en inglés. Si prefieres, conversar en
español, por favor utilize la lista debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:15:13PM -0300, Alejandro wrote:
> Tengo un Debian con file systems ReiserFS para /, /usr y /var. La
> par
Tengo un Debian con file systems ReiserFS para /, /usr y /var. La
particion correspondiente a / esta entre medio de las particiones /boot
(ext2) y /var. En este momento / me esta quedando chica y necesito
hacerla mas grande.
Siendo / una particion con ReiserFS, es posible agrandarla de alguna
> > Is there a quick fix I can do to get her into her email for today?
>
> Use mutt.
Actually, it is even easier - I also have Gnome but never use it - she can log
into a Gnome session and use Icedove with no problems.
> As a temp fix I suppose you could move her data but if
hich also
> fails, saying I need to use reiserfs --rebuild-sb, which also fails. I
> think I may need to migrate my /home to ext3 or something.
There was a thread not that long ago about this very issue. I have
unreliable power without UPS. I migrated from ext3 due to power-failure
ind
I have a problem with my Sid system after an unplanned reboot due to a power
outage. The reiserfsck fails to fix my /home (I have an LVM/raid1 setup) and
says I need to do it manually using reiserfsck --rebuild-tree, which also
fails, saying I need to use reiserfs --rebuild-sb, which also
Promise FastTrak 100
controller which had one disk die in a mirrored pair and the fact that
neither DamnSmallLinux nor SystemRescueCD has allowed me to write a file
bigger than 2GB on an ext2 partition!!
Eventually I found that SystemRescueCD would allow me to create and mount a
ReiserFS par
/hda6 /mnt/test/
mount: Operation not supported
[qoute]
when i try to reiserfsck /dev/hda6:
Do you want to run this program?[N/Yes] (note need to type Yes if you
do):Yes
###
reiserfsck --check started at Tue Aug 15 19:33:59 2006
###
Replaying journal..
Reiserfs journal '/de
06 17:03, marc wrote:
Hi,
I have a little problem :-o
Machine has Windows on sda2 vfat, which is the MBR. (sda1 is not
used),
Linux on sda3, sda4 contains sda5 swap, sda6 ext Linux, sda7 is vfat
shared space.
Here's the story, so far
- moved Linux (on sda3) to a safe place whil
wrote:
Hi,
I have a little problem :-o
Machine has Windows on sda2 vfat, which is the MBR. (sda1 is not used),
Linux on sda3, sda4 contains sda5 swap, sda6 ext Linux, sda7 is vfat
shared space.
Here's the story, so far
- moved Linux (on sda3) to a safe place while booted on another
pa
sda2 vfat, which is the MBR. (sda1 is not used),
Linux on sda3, sda4 contains sda5 swap, sda6 ext Linux, sda7 is vfat
shared space.
Here's the story, so far
- moved Linux (on sda3) to a safe place while booted on another
partition (sda6)
- formatted sda3 as reiserfs
- amended both fstabs
; >
> > > Machine has Windows on sda2 vfat, which is the MBR. (sda1 is not used),
> > > Linux on sda3, sda4 contains sda5 swap, sda6 ext Linux, sda7 is vfat
> > > shared space.
> > >
> > > Here's the story, so far
> > >
> > > - move
Linux on sda3, sda4 contains sda5 swap, sda6 ext Linux, sda7 is vfat
> > shared space.
> >
> > Here's the story, so far
> >
> > - moved Linux (on sda3) to a safe place while booted on another
> > partition (sda6)
> > - formatted sda3 as reiserfs
> &g
1 - 100 of 668 matches
Mail list logo
