On 8/12/24 04:09, Wesley wrote:
Most recent years we keep using the ext4 filesystem. But years ago before ext4 we used the ReiserFS filesystem. In my memory ReiserFS was a good choice for our application (many small files). Do you anybody still use ReiserFS today? How about it compares to ext4?
IIRC it got its efficiency boost by storing bits of one file in the allocated-but-not-full inode of another. While true, that's more space efficient, good luck untangling the mess that filesystem damage makes. -- I firmly believed we should not march into Baghdad ...To occupy Iraq would instantly shatter our coalition, turning the whole Arab world against us and make ... a latter-day Arab hero assigning young soldiers to a fruitless hunt for a securely entrenched dictator[.] -- GHWB
