* Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> scrolling is one place to measure, but there are several (font choice
> is another, e.g., Xft is notoriously slow). Older versions of rxvt
> would stop refreshing while they were getting input, and then paint
> the final screen (usually faster, but w
cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Actually, it has been worse at times than even above. Yesterday, I
>> > ran the same test and it took 20 seconds. I thought that was pretty
>> > awful.
>>
>> But at the sa
* Thomas Dickey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, it has been worse at times than even above. Yesterday, I
> > ran the same test and it took 20 seconds. I thought that was pretty
> > awful.
>
> But at the same time rxvt would be running slower (due to
cothrige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Michelle Konzack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Am 2007-05-16 15:59:10, schrieb cothrige:
>> > I have installed xterm via apt, running etch, and have noticed that it
>> > scrolls really slowly. I compared it to rxvt by running `time ls` in
>> > /usr/bin with
* Michelle Konzack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Am 2007-05-16 15:59:10, schrieb cothrige:
> > I have installed xterm via apt, running etch, and have noticed that it
> > scrolls really slowly. I compared it to rxvt by running `time ls` in
> > /usr/bin with rxvt taking 0.572s and xterm running at 4.
Am 2007-05-18 03:09:00, schrieb Vincent Lefevre:
> Hmm... yes. I've tried with xterm using a 20,000-line scrollback,
> and zsh:
>
> for i in {1..3}; echo $i
>
> On my 400 Mhz PowerBook G4, Debian/testing, XTerm 225: 71 seconds
> (but only 6 seconds with a 600-line scrollback).
> With rxvt (
Am 2007-05-16 15:59:10, schrieb cothrige:
> I have installed xterm via apt, running etch, and have noticed that it
> scrolls really slowly. I compared it to rxvt by running `time ls` in
> /usr/bin with rxvt taking 0.572s and xterm running at 4.633s. Earlier
> it was even worse taking over 10 seco
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-05-17 11:03:57 -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>> For "large" scrollbacks, e.g., more than 10,000 lines,
>> xterm has its own problems.
> Hmm... yes. I've tried with xterm using a 20,000-line scrollback,
> and zsh:
> for i in {1..3}; echo $i
On 2007-05-17 11:03:57 -, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> For "large" scrollbacks, e.g., more than 10,000 lines,
> xterm has its own problems.
Hmm... yes. I've tried with xterm using a 20,000-line scrollback,
and zsh:
for i in {1..3}; echo $i
On my 400 Mhz PowerBook G4, Debian/testing, XTerm 22
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-05-16 15:59:10 -0500, cothrige wrote:
>> I have installed xterm via apt, running etch, and have noticed that it
>> scrolls really slowly. I compared it to rxvt by running `time ls` in
>> /usr/bin with rxvt taking 0.572s and xterm running at 4.63
On 2007-05-16 15:59:10 -0500, cothrige wrote:
> I have installed xterm via apt, running etch, and have noticed that it
> scrolls really slowly. I compared it to rxvt by running `time ls` in
> /usr/bin with rxvt taking 0.572s and xterm running at 4.633s. Earlier
> it was even worse taking over 10
I have installed xterm via apt, running etch, and have noticed that it
scrolls really slowly. I compared it to rxvt by running `time ls` in
/usr/bin with rxvt taking 0.572s and xterm running at 4.633s. Earlier
it was even worse taking over 10 seconds. It is a very big difference
in usage, and if
12 matches
Mail list logo
