Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.)

> printing images is so *20th* century. ^ 2D -- Stefan

Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.)

On 2021-05-23, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >>When I wanted a quick, lightweight image viewer I setted on sxiv. I >>also wanted to print from the viewer and sxiv gives me that facilty. >>My recollection is neither qiv nor feh gave me that. Maybe I didn't >>look hard enough. > > Aha! Thanks for the sug

Re: xv

On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 1:23 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > i wrote: > > > halve_jpeg.c > > Dan Hitt wrote: > > It was unwilling to deal with a non-color image that i had ("Unsuitable > JPEG > > format with 1 components per pixel"), [...] > > if i need to deal with non-color images, i can try

Re: xv

Hi, i wrote: > > halve_jpeg.c Dan Hitt wrote: > It was unwilling to deal with a non-color image that i had ("Unsuitable JPEG > format with 1 components per pixel"), [...] > if i need to deal with non-color images, i can try to modify it. It is much ad-hoc work, i have to confess. The images whic

Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.)

Brian wrote: >On Sat 22 May 2021 at 18:52:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: >> I have no idea about xv specifically, but you might consider qiv, which >> is in Debian. It's lightweight (87K for the binary, 204K by my count for >> the package), I've never had difficulty with its command-line interface >

Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.)

On Sat 22 May 2021 at 18:52:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote: > I have no idea about xv specifically, but you might consider qiv, which > is in Debian. It's lightweight (87K for the binary, 204K by my count for > the package), I've never had difficulty with its command-line interface > (in point of fa

Re: xv

On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 4:33 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Dan Hitt wrote: > > Thomas, that sounds awesome, please do post somewhere (and provide a link > > here, if you would be so kind). > > So on popular demand by one potential user here it is > > http://scdbackup.sourceforge.net/halve_

Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.)

On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 11:50:57AM -0700, Charlie Gibbs wrote: I have to fall back to another viewer (usually ristretto, which I really don't like) to view these files. (Working on a file that xv likes with the Gimp is one good way to make a file it doesn't like.) I used xv, a long time ago. T

Re: xv

Hi, Dan Hitt wrote: > Thomas, that sounds awesome, please do post somewhere (and provide a link > here, if you would be so kind). So on popular demand by one potential user here it is http://scdbackup.sourceforge.net/halve_jpeg.c SHA256SUM: b4c9322cd7d20a09a5196ccbcec257bf363d9dea1284333afc

Re: xv

On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 2:33 PM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Hi, > > Charlie Gibbs wrote: > > : Unsupported JPEG process: SOF type 0xc2 > > My xv reports this on Progressive JPEG images like > http://www.reasoft.com/tutorials/web/img/progress.jpg > > My xv binary stems from source xv-3.10a.tar.gz of

Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.)

On 2021-05-22 6:52 p.m., The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-05-22 at 14:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On Fri May 21 16:08:33 2021 Rich wrote: >> >> > There are five binaries that get installed in Slackware for the >> > xv package: >> > usr/bin/xvpictoppm >> > usr/bin/xv >> > usr/bin/vdcomp >>

Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.)

On 2021-05-22 at 14:50, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On Fri May 21 16:08:33 2021 Rich wrote: > > > There are five binaries that get installed in Slackware for the > > xv package: > > usr/bin/xvpictoppm > > usr/bin/xv > > usr/bin/vdcomp > > usr/bin/bggen > > usr/bin/xcmap > > > > and there are

Re: xv

Hi, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > : Unsupported JPEG process: SOF type 0xc2 My xv reports this on Progressive JPEG images like http://www.reasoft.com/tutorials/web/img/progress.jpg My xv binary stems from source xv-3.10a.tar.gz of june 2000. Its Makefile indicates that it gets linked statically with

Re: xv (was Re: Changing background automatically, Mint 20.)

On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 12:09 PM Charlie Gibbs wrote: > On Fri May 21 16:08:33 2021 Rich wrote: > > > There are five binaries that get installed in Slackware for the > > xv package: > > usr/bin/xvpictoppm > > usr/bin/xv > > usr/bin/vdcomp > > usr/bin/bggen > > usr/bin/xcmap > > > > and

Re: xv resolved (was Re: update messages)

On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 21:46 +, Digby Tarvin wrote: > Mind you - it still looks like xlockmore and xearth disappeared from > the official packages with only an automated acknowledgement that > they are gone rather than an explanation: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/xlockmore/news/200611

Re: XV for PPC

Ron Johnson wrote: > Have you tried compiling from source? not needed, we have it for a long time already in our repository http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/ -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://people.pa

Re: XV for PPC

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chuck Payne wrote: > Hey guys, I know that SV is shareware and like to get for debian 3.1 ppc, does > anyone know where I can get? > > I have tried to google it, but most of the sites are down, or are i386. Have you tried compiling from source? htt

Re: XV Video Output Driver Problem

shell wrote: gustavo halperin 写道: Hello I have, apparently, xv support for my trident driver (CyberBlade XP4m32). But when I run "mplayer -vo xv " or "xine -V xv " I hear the movie but I see a blue screen. With "x11" driver every think is OK but a little slow. What is the problem? I need to

Re: XV Video Output Driver Problem

gustavo halperin 写道: Hello I have, apparently, xv support for my trident driver (CyberBlade XP4m32). But when I run "mplayer -vo xv " or "xine -V xv " I hear the movie but I see a blue screen. With "x11" driver every think is OK but a little slow. What is the problem? I need to do some speci

Re: XV with Nvidia on Sid xorg

On Sunday 30 October 2005 11:20 am, William Ballard wrote: > Does XV work on Nvidia with Sid's Xorg, using Nvidia's propitary > drivers? Yes it does. As far as I know, there's no extra configuration required. -- I use digital signatures and encryption. My key is stored at pgp.mit.edu 0x8DB3BF09

Re: xv

Patrick Wiseman wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:09:46 -0500, Mason Loring Bliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images. Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry a

Re: xv

On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 18:54, William Ballard wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:09:46PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > > > > > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images. > > > Just apt-get it and you

Re: xv

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:09:46PM -0500, Mason Loring Bliss wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > > > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images. > > Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-) > > Does qiv have a

Re: xv

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:09:46 -0500, Mason Loring Bliss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > > > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images. > > Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-) > > D

Re: xv

On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images. > Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-) Does qiv have a function like xv's -maxpect? I really miss this in other programs. I'd be happy

Re: xv

On Saturday 18 December 2004 08:52 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > Funny, I seem to recall the GPL saying the reverse: > > When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not > price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you > have the freedom to distribute copies of

Re: xv

On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 09:12:29PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > There's no way that xv is GPL, much less DSFG-free. I never claimed that it was either one. In fact, I pointed out that it was NOT DFSG-free, and why it was not. The xv license restricts distribution and use. It's as simple as that.

Re: xv

On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 18:52 -0800, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 09:44:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > On Friday 17 December 2004 10:22 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > > > > > The fact that it's shareware has nothing to do with it. > > > > Yes, it does. That means (by definition) th

Re: xv

On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 09:44:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 17 December 2004 10:22 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > > > The fact that it's shareware has nothing to do with it. > > Yes, it does. That means (by definition) that it's under a non-Free license, Funny, I seem to recall the GPL

Re: xv

On Friday 17 December 2004 10:22 pm, Marc Wilson wrote: > The fact that it's shareware has nothing to do with it. Yes, it does. That means (by definition) that it's under a non-Free license, and therefore not eligible for distribution in Debian/main, and that most Debian users and maintainers

Re: xv

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:53:10PM -0600, Bart Dorsey wrote: > If you have a 3d accelerated video card, gliv is pretty nice uses > opengl to scale and display the image... and the scroll wheel on a > mouse zooms in and out. Interesting... but xv is *much* faster. I *do* like the mouse-wheel-a

Re: xv

If you have a 3d accelerated video card, gliv is pretty nice uses opengl to scale and display the image... and the scroll wheel on a mouse zooms in and out. It also accepts multiple images from the command line, and a click of the mouse make it slide show them with a neat fade from one image t

Re: xv

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:29:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 17 December 2004 11:15, Ivan Glushkov wrote: > > > I have a simple question: > > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian? > > I have a simple answer: > Because it's shareware. See http://www.trilon.com/xv/pricing.html

Re: xv

I will be out of the office starting Monday, December 20 and will return on Tuesday, January 4. I will not be checking email regularly during this time. Have a great holiday break! -- Brandon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Re: xv

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 08:20:40PM -0500, William Ballard wrote: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images. > > Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-) > > I seco

Re: xv

On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 06:39:48AM +0530, Sridhar M.A. wrote: > I personally would recommend qiv. A wonderful tool for viewing images. > Just apt-get it and you will, probably, never worry about xv :-) I second this. There is also "display" from imagemagick. qiv loads more quickly; but I think

Re: xv

I will be out of the office starting Monday, December 20 and will return on Tuesday, January 4. I will not be checking email regularly during this time. Have a great holiday break! -- Brandon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EM

Re: xv

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:29:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > On Friday 17 December 2004 11:15, Ivan Glushkov wrote: > > > > > I have a simple question: > > > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian? > >

Re: xv

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 06:15:46PM +0100, Ivan Glushkov wrote: > Hi list, > > I have a simple question: > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian? > > I mean, I googled for that, I saw some previous discussion about that, I > found even a package on: > > http://ftp.irb.hr/debian-archive/dist

Re: xv

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 12:35:01PM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:29:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > > Basically, there are any number of functionality identical programs > > (ie 'display' from ImageMagick) that are Free and available through > > the normal Debian chann

Re: xv

Hello Ivan, hello list! On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 06:15:46PM +0100, Ivan Glushkov wrote: > I have a simple question: > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian? See HTH, Flo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: xv

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:29:39AM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 17 December 2004 11:15, Ivan Glushkov wrote: > > > I have a simple question: > > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian? > > I have a simple answer: > Because it's shareware. See http://www.trilon.com/xv/pricing.html

Re: xv

On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 18:15 +0100, Ivan Glushkov wrote: > Hi list, > > I have a simple question: > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian? > > I mean, I googled for that, I saw some previous discussion about that, I > found even a package on: > > http://ftp.irb.hr/debian-archive/dists/hamm/

Re: xv

On Friday 17 December 2004 11:15, Ivan Glushkov wrote: > I have a simple question: > Why xv is not any more supported by Debian? I have a simple answer: Because it's shareware. See http://www.trilon.com/xv/pricing.html for details. Basically, there are any number of functionality identical pro

Re: Xv video driver expires after xfree86 upgrade

Alphonse Ogulla wrote: What graphics driver are you using (what video card)? Ist the XVideo extension listed in xdpyinfo? onboard Intel 810e graphics adaptor. xdpyinfo lists XVideo amongst 27 other extensions Is it a laptop? I had a problem with my laptop where if the X server was started whil

Re: Xv video driver expires after xfree86 upgrade

> On Monday 06 October 2003 11:21, Alphonse Ogulla wrote: > > Up to very recently, I could watch vcd movies on my box using xine video > > player with Xv as the video driver. However, I came to discover yesterday > > that Xv video driver had become inoperative after either upgrading > > xfree86 fro

Re: Xv video driver expires after xfree86 upgrade

On Monday 06 October 2003 11:21, Alphonse Ogulla wrote: > Up to very recently, I could watch vcd movies on my box using xine video > player with Xv as the video driver. However, I came to discover yesterday > that Xv video driver had become inoperative after either upgrading xfree86 > from version

Re: xv compilation

On 01 Aug 2003 22:34:54 -0500 Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > xv is also listed at apt-get.org. I "registered" it a few years ago, when I was using RH, and I like "seeing" my name when I start it up ;-) I did find mt "problem". Being tired, and "knowing" what I was doing was the culprit

Re: xv compilation

On Fri, 1 Aug 2003 19:43:28 -0700 Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:38:44PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote: > > Has anyone gotten xv-3.10a to compile successfully under debian, > > with all patches applied? > > Of course. > > > I'm having trouble getting PNG suppo

Re: xv compilation

On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 10:34:54PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > xv is also listed at apt-get.org. Yeah, that's where I found the original source archive of 3.10a-26 that I have. > Marc, maybe you could list your xv w/ apt-get.org... Uh, no. I'm not about to get into *supporting* the thing. Some

Re: xv compilation

On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 21:43, Marc Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:38:44PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote: > > Has anyone gotten xv-3.10a to compile successfully under debian, with > > all patches applied? > > Of course. > > > I'm having trouble getting PNG support compiled in. > > Why?

Re: xv compilation

On Thu, Jul 31, 2003 at 09:38:44PM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote: > Has anyone gotten xv-3.10a to compile successfully under debian, with > all patches applied? Of course. > I'm having trouble getting PNG support compiled in. Why? All the necessary patches are on the web site. > Everything comp

Re: xv (graphics package)

On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:57:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I seem to recall that the xv package (graphics viewer / editor) by John > Bradley was formerly included in an earlier distribution (potato, maybe?). > It doesn't seem to be in the current distributions. rei $ dpkg -l | grep "3.1

Re: xv (graphics package)

On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 02:26:27PM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > xv was in non-free in potato but it appears that no one wanted to maintain > it any more so it was removed. Actually, it turned out to be against the terms of the licence to distribute binaries built from patched source, which included

Re: xv (graphics package)

Hello * On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:57:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to recall that the xv package (graphics viewer / editor) by John > Bradley was formerly included in an earlier distribution (potato, maybe?). > It doesn't seem to be in the current di

Re: xv (graphics package)

xv was in non-free in potato but it appears that no one wanted to maintain it any more so it was removed. Try imagemagick. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont

Re: xv (graphics package)

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to recall that the xv package (graphics viewer / editor) by John > Bradley was formerly included in an earlier distribution (potato, maybe?). > It doesn't seem to be in the current distributions. Does anyone know if > it is availab

Re: xv (graphics package)

On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:57:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I seem to recall that the xv package (graphics viewer / editor) by John > Bradley was formerly included in an earlier distribution (potato, maybe?). > It doesn't seem to be in the current distributions. Does anyone know if >

Re: xv (graphics package)

* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030319 11:18 PST]: > Hi, > > I seem to recall that the xv package (graphics viewer / editor) by John > Bradley was formerly included in an earlier distribution (potato, maybe?). > It doesn't seem to be in the current distributions. Does anyone know if

Re: xv (graphics package)

On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:57:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to recall that the xv package (graphics viewer / editor) by John > Bradley was formerly included in an earlier distribution (potato, maybe?). > It doesn't seem to be in the current distributions. Does anyone kno

Re: xv?

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:11:55AM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote: > Is there a policy reason why there is no xv package, or is it just that no > one has bothered to package it? It was removed some time ago because its licence doesn't allow us to distribute binaries built from modified source. The x

Re: xv?

"Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I believe it's non-free... ...and more to the point, I believe it's non-free to the point of being non-distributable. Googling for 'debian xv license' brings some useful hits; one of these is http://www.fifi.org/doc/xv-doc/html/availability.html, w

Re: xv?

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:11:55AM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote: > Is there a policy reason why there is no xv package, or is it just that no > one has bothered to package it? > > --Greg > I prefer xzgv from http://xzgv.browser.org/ : xzgv differs from other picture viewers for X in that it use

Re: xv?

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:18:13PM +0100, Gottfried Szing wrote: > Gregory Seidman wrote: > > >Is there a policy reason why there is no xv package, or is it just that no > >one has bothered to package it? > > > > > > do you mean xview? i think xv is the old name. xv and xview are different pro

Re: xv?

On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 17:11, Gregory Seidman wrote: > Is there a policy reason why there is no xv package, or is it just that no > one has bothered to package it? AFAIK it's non free, (shareware) and not allowing modification and/or binary distribution. -- Mark Janssen -- maniac(at)maniac.nl --

Re: xv?

I believe it's non-free... Thus spake Gregory Seidman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:11:55 -0500 > From: Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian users list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: xv? > X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/242226 > > Is there a p

Re: xv?

Gregory Seidman wrote: Is there a policy reason why there is no xv package, or is it just that no one has bothered to package it? do you mean xview? i think xv is the old name. cu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: xv on potato?

begin Mike Fontenot quotation: > > that he get it from potato. I can't find it on potato either. > Has it been removed from potato also? Is there any way to > get it in a debian package? STFW. Go to google, type in "xv debian", and hit "I'm Feeling Lucky". -- Shawn McMahon

Re: xv on potato?

On Fri Apr 26, 2002 at 01:42:49PM -0600, Mike Fontenot wrote: > > I recently saw an old posting on this group that asked > what happened to xv on woody. Someone answered that it > had been removed because of licensing issues, but recommended > that he get it from potato. I can't find it on potat

Re: xv: vanished from unstable

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:17:35PM -0200, Michel Loos wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed today that xv is no longer available in unstable. > What is the replacement package ? > There is not one :-( I understand it's a licensing issue, but I assre you I will be building it by hand for all of my machines

Re: xv: vanished from unstable

Michel Loos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I noticed today that xv is no longer available in unstable. > What is the replacement package ? gqview to view; gimp to edit. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vot

Re: xv: vanished from unstable

On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 12:17:35PM -0200, Michel Loos wrote: > I noticed today that xv is no longer available in unstable. > What is the replacement package ? xv had to be removed for legal reasons (it turned out we weren't allowed to ship binaries built from patched source). There are a number of

Re: xv package

Or gqview. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and mh-e. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.

Re: xv package

On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:43:01PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote: Do anyone know where to find a debian package for xv (the classical X graphical utility). It seems to have disappear from the debian archives... :-( It was removed due to licensing problems. Try xloadimage or display (the latter

Re: xv package

On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 02:43:01PM +0100, Bruno BEAUFILS wrote: > Do anyone know where to find a debian package for xv (the classical X > graphical utility). It seems to have disappear from the debian > archives... :-( It was removed due to licensing problems. Try xloadimage or display (the latter

Re: xv alternatives

#include Henry House wrote on Tue Aug 14, 2001 um 02:54:56PM: > I've tried xloadimage and its derivative xli. I've had problems with both, > e.g., some options do not work right and many images cause the program to Esetroot is working fine for me. From my ~/.xsession: Esetroot -s `perl -e 'prin

Re: xv alternatives

On 15 Aug 2001, Henry House wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:10:46AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > feh doesn't work here. It produces the thumbprints of the images but > > there is no way of enlarging them, either with the keys or the mouse. > > Strange...have you tried fiddling with the o

Re: xv alternatives

On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 09:10:46AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > feh doesn't work here. It produces the thumbprints of the images but > there is no way of enlarging them, either with the keys or the mouse. Strange...have you tried fiddling with the options? There is a thubnail mode which is spe

Re: xv alternatives

On 14 Aug 2001, Henry House wrote: > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:25:29PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 10:41:51AM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote: > > > > > > I second that. I love the way xloadimage turns the cursor into a double > > > arrow where the image is larger th

Re: xv alternatives

On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:25:29PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 10:41:51AM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote: > > > > I second that. I love the way xloadimage turns the cursor into a double > > arrow where the image is larger than the screen and lets you move the > > image

Re: Xv-problem on xfree 4.0.3

At 997020505s since epoch (08/05/01 12:08:25 -0400 UTC), Herbert Pirke wrote: > I'm running Debian testing/unstable with an 2.4.7 > kernel and xfree 4.0.3. I have a Voodoo3 running in my > dual celeron 400, so I guess that Xv should be running > fine. You'd guess that, but alas, you'd be wrong...

Re: Xv-problem on xfree 4.0.3

> You can try running xine with the "-s" flag, which > uses shared memory. > It's slower, but it will work (worked for me). Have you managed to run movies in full-screen? I cannot find an option that would toggle to full screen mode when I use th -s option... > Also, you can upgrade to XF 4.1, w

Re: Xv-problem on xfree 4.0.3

At 997033978s since epoch (08/05/01 15:52:58 -0400 UTC), Herbert Pirke wrote: > > > You can try running xine with the "-s" flag, which > > uses shared memory. > > It's slower, but it will work (worked for me). > > Have you managed to run movies in full-screen? I > cannot find an option that would

Re: xv alternatives

Michael P. Soulier wrote: > Hmm. > > I'd argue that this is what good coding is for. Even good coders make mistakes. My resource limits have saved my system from OOM due to badly behaved code I was writing or debugging, accidental fork bombs (yes, it can be done!), etc, more times than

Re: xv alternatives

on Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 10:29:33AM -0400, Michael P. Soulier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 02:53:22AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Carl Johnson wrote: > > > I haven't tried imagemagick recently, but it's crashed my system > > > enough times over the years that I avoid it when

Re: xv alternatives

on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 06:26:37PM -0400, Rick Pasotto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:16:17PM -0500, Michael A. Miller wrote: > > > "Noah" == Noah L Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > Since xv is being removed from the distribution, I would > > >

Re: xv alternatives

On Sun, Jul 08, 2001 at 02:53:22AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Carl Johnson wrote: > > I haven't tried imagemagick recently, but it's crashed my system > > enough times over the years that I avoid it whenever possible. Unless > > it has changed recently, it doesn't check memory. If it runs out of >

Re: xv alternatives

Carl Johnson wrote: > I haven't tried imagemagick recently, but it's crashed my system > enough times over the years that I avoid it whenever possible. Unless > it has changed recently, it doesn't check memory. If it runs out of > memory it will keep trying until the system daemons run out of mem

Re: xv alternatives

Joe Bouchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know if it is quite the same, but I use "display" and "convert" > that comes in the "imagemagick" package. imagemagick is free as long as > you use the libmagick4g library instead of the libmagick4g-lzw (which > comes from non-free). I didn't ma

Re: xv alternatives

On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 10:41:51AM +0100, Phillip Deackes wrote: > > I second that. I love the way xloadimage turns the cursor into a double > arrow where the image is larger than the screen and lets you move the > image around so you can see all parts of it more easily. Much nicer than > the way

Re: xv alternatives

On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:44:24AM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > Plus the fact that you have to give an option to tell it to shutup about > what it's doing. That doesn't bother me, but "alias" is your friend. -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] I-Con's Science and Technology Programming

Re: xv alternatives

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 08:09:52PM -0400, Carl Fink wrote: > I like xloadimage (xview), although xv is certainly nice. I tried that and didn't like it. For a series of pictures it destroys and creates the window for each one instead of just resizing the window. All that flashing is very annoying.

Re: xv alternatives

Hi, I don't know if it is quite the same, but I use "display" and "convert" that comes in the "imagemagick" package. imagemagick is free as long as you use the libmagick4g library instead of the libmagick4g-lzw (which comes from non-free). I didn't make a concious effort to choose the free versi

Re: xv alternatives

On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 20:09:52 -0400 Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I like xloadimage (xview), although xv is certainly nice. I second that. I love the way xloadimage turns the cursor into a double arrow where the image is larger than the screen and lets you move the image around so you can

Re: xv alternatives

I like xloadimage (xview), although xv is certainly nice. -- Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED] I-Con's Science and Technology Programming

Re: xv alternatives

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 06:26:37PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > If you do 'display *.jpg' for a large number of files total memory > used keeps increasing until all memory (including swap) is used up. > > This does not happen with xv. It's things like this that will make me miss xv so much. It's

Re: xv alternatives

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:16:17PM -0500, Michael A. Miller wrote: > > "Noah" == Noah L Meyerhans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Since xv is being removed from the distribution, I would > > like to find a new image viewer to use. > > I use "display", which is part of the imagemag

Re: xv alternatives

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > > Since xv is being removed from the distribution, I would like to > > find a > > new image viewer to use. > > Why is this happening? Can't we continue to use the cu

Re: xv alternatives

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > The features I really want are: > 1. Lots of easy keyboard commands (Tab & Backspace were great in XV) > 2. Intelligent scaling (I liked the zoom maxspect feature of XV, where >it would zoom as close as possible to the screens

Re: xv alternatives

On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:37:56PM -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote: > On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote: > > Since xv is being removed from the distribution, I would like to find a > > new image viewer to use. > > Why is this happening? Can't we continue to use the curren

  1   2   >