-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:49:28PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > I thought the insides of walls existed as a repository for empty
> > cigarette packets, food wrappers, bent nails, odd lumps of plaster and
> > other miscellaneous small building debris..
- Original Message -
From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
> On Thursday 13 November 2003 20:15, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > Op do 13-1
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 10:49:28PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-13 at 12:45, Pigeon wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:42:02PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 18:21, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> > > > Still a bit confused on what hardware components i need but
On Thursday 13 November 2003 20:15, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Op do 13-11-2003, om 02:12 schreef BruceG:
>
>
>
> > For the wireless bridge to work, it would need to connect to a WAP
> > (wireless access point). Since your Server is upstairs, you could do
> > something like this (assuming your cab
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
> > [snip]
> > >
> > > Still a bit confused on what hardware
Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
[snip]
Still a bit confused on what hardware components i need but
the wife is getting really tired of the cable.
I think she even deliberatly tries to ware out the cable: it runs
under a door as well and she loves to open and close that do
CTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM
> > > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
> [snip]
> >
> > Still a bit confused on what hardware components i need but
> > the wife is getting really tired of the cable.
> > I th
Op do 13-11-2003, om 02:12 schreef BruceG:
> For the wireless bridge to work, it would need to connect to a WAP (wireless
> access point). Since your Server is upstairs, you could do something like
> this (assuming your cable or DSL is dropped off with an Ethernet connection,
> not USB):
>
> DS
;> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM
>> >> > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
>> > [snip]
>> >>
>> >> Still a bit confused on what hardware components i n
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM
> >> > Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
> > [snip]
> >>
> >> Still a bit confused on what hardware components i need but
> >> the wife is getting really
> On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 18:21, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
>> BruceG wrote:
>> > - Original Message -
>> > From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM
>
On Wed, 2003-11-12 at 18:21, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> BruceG wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: wireless
> 802.11B is 10 MBPS. 802.11G can go to 54MBPS. You may be limited by
> distance. I figure since my DSL connection is 256Meg or so - 10 Meg is
okay
> on the LAN side, although it can get slow doing backups over wireless.
>
Wow! That 256Meg is a FAST DSL connection! I should have said 256K. I just
- Original Message -
From: "Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
>
> BruceG wrote:
> > - Original Message -
&g
BruceG wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM
> Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
>
>
>>
>> - Orig
- Original Message -
From: "BruceG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 5:39 PM
Subject: Re: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Benedict Verheyen" &l
- Original Message -
From: "Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 3:16 PM
Subject: wireless LAN in place of existing cabled one
> Hi,
>
> my current LAN looks like this:
>
> cable - eth0 (public ip) -server
> modem
"Benedict Verheyen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> my current LAN looks like this:
>
> cable - eth0 (public ip) -server
> modemeth1 (192.168.0.1)
> |
>hub
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
