On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:10:05 +0100, Jason A Whittle wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:08:52PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:30:18 +0100, Jason A Whittle wrote:
>> > Everything seems to be working fine, but my terms are all at the default
>> > resolution. I know that fbset us
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:08:52PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:30:18 +0100, Jason A Whittle wrote:
> > Everything seems to be working fine, but my terms are all at the default
> > resolution. I know that fbset used to be used to set the framebuffer
> > terminal resolution, bu
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:30:18 +0100, Jason A Whittle wrote:
> I've been avoiding using framebuffer for the terminals since fb support
> was mainstreamed into the i386 kernel, and simply setting the term
> resolution in lilo.conf. It seems that framebuffers are the way of the
> future, and may ev
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:21:17PM +, Jason A Whittle wrote:
| but it seems that with udev, the /dev/fb[0-9] devices
| no longer exist. Is there a way to get around this, or does everyone
| simply use xterms these days?
My solution was to add this line to /etc/udev/links.conf :
M fb0
4 matches
Mail list logo
