On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 07:10:05 +0100, Jason A Whittle wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 02:08:52PM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 22:30:18 +0100, Jason A Whittle wrote: >> > Everything seems to be working fine, but my terms are all at the default >> > resolution. I know that fbset used to be used to set the framebuffer >> > terminal resolution, but it seems that with udev, the /dev/fb[0-9] devices >> > no longer exist. Is there a way to get around this, or does everyone >> > simply use xterms these days? >> >> What framebuffer driver are you using? I'm using vesa, and it doesn't >> create framebuffer device files, even though udev does have a rule. But > > Interesting. I'd like to RTFM, but the FrameBuffer HOWTO was last updated > in 2000, and reading over it, it doesn't strike me as terribly relevant to > my situation. Is there a better source of information you could recommend? > >> IIRC, fbset isn't supposed to work with vesa, because the vesa framebuffer >> doesn't let you change the resolution except at startup. > > Do you give vesafb its resolution in lilo.conf or elsewhere? I assume > vesafb is the default, but how do I know for sure what framebuffer driver > I'm using?
I use grub, so I use the vga= kernel parameter. The equivalent in lilo would be: append=" vga=788" You can find out what framebuffer driver you are using by looking at the output from dmesg. (BTW, I genuinely don't know whether the vesa framebuffer driver is supposed to be able to interact with the /dev/fb[0-9] devices - there might be a kernel bug in this regard.) >> > Also, does anyone know how the fbgetty package differs from the default >> >> in /etc/issue than the standard getty) but the number one reason I use it >> is because it doesn't have a certain bug that the default getty has (which >> makes it take a while to re-spawn a new getty after logout). > > Sounds reasonable. Is there anything to installing fbgetty besides > 'apt-get install fbgetty'? You'll have to edit /etc/inittab so that it actually uses /sbin/fbgetty instead of /sbin/getty (because /sbin/getty isn't an alternative the way most substitute packages are - it's a real binary because it's so essential to getting the system up and running). You'll also want to edit /etc/issue (after looking at fbgetty's manpage) because its placeholders there are different. > And is there someplace I can look for a list of > framebuffers available for the 2.6 kernel? -- I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment. See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures. My key was last signed 10/14/2003. If you use GPG *please* see me about signing the key. ***** My computer can't give you viruses by email. *** -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]