Thilo Six wrote the following on 11.02.2011 17:41
> Hello
>
> i am wondering why squeeze-proposed-updates contains lenny packages like e.g.:
>
> $ apt-cache policy linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
> linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 2.6.26-26lenny2
> Version table:
> yes. I know the version numbers are lower than in squeeze, so harm is done to
^- no
sorry for the mistake
--
bye Thilo
4096R/0xC70B1A8F
721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote the following on 12.02.2011 00:00
-- --
> (aptitude search '~S~Asqueeze-proposed-updates!~Alenny-proposed-updates'),
> maybe? You might have to use different search terms, depending on what is in
> those Release files.
I'll see how far i can get.
>> If i unders
In , Thilo Six wrote:
>Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote the following on 11.02.2011 22:55
>> In this case, it is probably an upload that was scheduled before the Lenny
>> -> Squeeze transition but finished after the transition. At least one
>> security update has done this and is currently being repac
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote the following on 11.02.2011 22:55
Hello
-- --
>> Is this a bug and should be reported or this intentionally?
>
> "lenny" in the version string is usually an indicator that the package was
> built in the lenny environment instead of the default (unstable) environme
In , Thilo Six wrote:
>i am wondering why squeeze-proposed-updates contains lenny packages like
>e.g.:
>
>$ apt-cache policy linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
>linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 2.6.26-26lenny2
> Version table:
> 2.6.26-26lenny2 0
>500 http://f
On Friday 11 February 2011 17:41:52 Thilo Six wrote:
> Hello
>
> i am wondering why squeeze-proposed-updates contains lenny packages like
> e.g.:
>
> $ apt-cache policy linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64
> linux-headers-2.6.26-2-amd64:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: 2.6.26-26lenny2
> Version ta
7 matches
Mail list logo