Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote the following on 12.02.2011 00:00
-- <snip> -- > (aptitude search '~S~Asqueeze-proposed-updates!~Alenny-proposed-updates'), > maybe? You might have to use different search terms, depending on what is in > those Release files. I'll see how far i can get. >> If i understand you correctly the debian workflow is to upload all >> stable-updates to s-p-u and then the SRM moves those to o-p-u afterwards? > > No, sorry. My understanding is that updates and go directly into os-p-u or > s-p-u and then they can migrate to s-u (new) when tested, or oldstable or > stable at a point release. yes, /me has thought/thinks so, too. > I mean that having packages that were supposed to be for os-p-u in s-p-u will > not adversely affect users of s-p-u, since the version numbers will be lower > than the ones in stable. yes. I know the version numbers are lower than in squeeze, so harm is done to running systems but a lot of bandwith and space on mirrors is wasted. So back to question one: Why are there a lot of packages in s-p-u that are clearly meant to be in o-p-u? Should i ask on debian-release? I couldn't find a list for ftp-master in the first place when i search earlier today. -- bye Thilo 4096R/0xC70B1A8F 721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ij4g9j$toh$1...@dough.gmane.org
