Mark Fletcher wrote:
DUH -- question is about smbfs package not
smbclient...
Hi list
I have a question about the smbclient package. What
does it provide that isn't provided by SMB FS support
in the kernel?
I currently run a 2.6.15.4 kernel and am about to
build myself a 2.6.17.7 kernel from ke
Sam Snow said:
> Hello,
>
Further follow-up. I am getting one error message at startup that I don't
remember having see before:
Sep 10 11:01:20 aslan modprobe: Note: /etc/modules.conf is more recent
than /lib/modules/2.4.27-1-686/modules.dep
Sep 10 11:01:21 aslan last message repeated 3 times
BTW, doing an strace on smbclient, it loads codepage.850,
unicode_map.850 and unicode_map.ISO8859-1.
Doing an lsmod, the only loaded nls table is nls_utf8.
--
João Miguel Neves
signature.asc
Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de me
Why don't you try
modprobe /lib/modules/2.2.20/fs/smbfs.o
#and then run ls mod to see if it has been loaded
lsmod
Jake Johnson
http://www.plutoid.com
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Clive Menzies wrote:
> On (06/06/03 12:16), Informática. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> > Doesn´t works!
> >
> > # modprobe s
On (06/06/03 14:48), Informática. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> How can I install the new kernel?
>
I use dselect - if you use help (?) it will give you the command key to
search (/) Look for "kernel"; to repeat the search use "\".
You need a kernel-image 2.4.18 for your machine type (probably i
On (06/06/03 12:16), Informática. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> Doesn´t works!
>
> # modprobe smbfs
> # Can´t locate module smbfs
>
> It says it cant locate the needed module, and I am sure that
> "apt-get install smbfs" says "Sorry, smbfs is already the newest version"
>
> Where is the module s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:16:32PM +0100, Inform?tica. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> Where is the module smbfs? How can I install it?
OK, you can go ahead and remove that smbfs package and get
kernel-source-$KVERS and kernel-package
See the documenta
efe de la Sección de Informática
Tf.922140170 Fx.922140151
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cabildo de La Gomera
Profesor Armas Fernández 2
S/S Gomera 38800
Tenerife (Canarias)
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 10:16:50AM +0100, Inform?tica. Cabildo de La Gomera wrote:
> ?Can someone tell me how to add support to smbfs to the Kernel?
Try modprobe smbfs. If this works, then add to the end of
/etc/modules this simple line:
smbfs
- --
Tim Verry wrote:
Nope, just installed from 3.0_r0/i386/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.iso
This:
http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/
search_contents.pl?word=smbfs.o&searchmode=searchfiles&case=insensitive&version=stable&arch=i386
tells me that smbfs.o is in the 2.2.20 kernel image package, so that
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 16:52, Tim Verry wrote:
> I have a pentium 200, non mmx. Do I need i586 or can I use i686?
You must choose i586, mmx or not. Same for the K6. i686 would PPro
upwards.
From the kernel doc, a few widely used conventions of varying relevance
to the current topic :
Here are t
I have a pentium 200, non mmx. Do I need i586 or can I use i686?
On Monday 25 November 2002 17:42, sean finney wrote:
> i think your problem is that the kernel installed by default doesn't
> seem to support smbfs. if you're not completely attached to said kernel
> and want to join the rest of th
Hi
I'm not sure if I'm totally out here, but have u tryed apt-get install
smbfs?
If I do apt-cache show smbfs it gives a lot of output, here is some:
Source: samba
Version: 2.999+3.0.alpha20-3
Replaces: smbfsx
Depends: netbase (>= 2.02), samba-common (= 2.999+3.0.alpha20-3), libc6
(>= 2.2.5-13),
Tim Verry said:
> I can't find it at all, used "locate" and KDE's "find files". Would there
> be any harm in just acquiring this file and throwing it in there?
if you can get the file from the 2.2.20 kernel there wouldn't be
much harm, you would probably have to load it via insmod -f smbfs.o
(t
On Monday 25 November 2002 18:00, nate wrote:
> that shows all the packages in woody which have the smbfs.o file(kernel
> module). the default 2.2.20 kernel appears to have it, is there not
> a /lib/modules/2.2.20/fs/smbfs.o on your system?
Nope. But the stuff in /lib/modules/2.2.20-idepci/fs ar
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 04:06:26PM -0500, Tim Verry wrote:
>
> mount -t smbfs -o username=me,password=foobar //server/share /dir/dir
> ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
> Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
> smbmnt failed: 255
> Have a variety of samba tools installed, i
Tim Verry said:
> Nope, just installed from 3.0_r0/i386/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.iso
>
> I've never compiled any kernels. I'm curious though how to do it if it's
> the answer to this problem. Hopefully then I can figure out what went
> wrong.
>
> I assume that it should have just been in the ke
i think your problem is that the kernel installed by default doesn't
seem to support smbfs. if you're not completely attached to said kernel
and want to join the rest of the 2.4 world, i recommend:
# apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18
you may need to add a line to lilo.conf about initrd (not su
Nope, just installed from 3.0_r0/i386/debian-30r0-i386-binary-1.iso
I've never compiled any kernels. I'm curious though how to do it if it's the
answer to this problem. Hopefully then I can figure out what went wrong.
I assume that it should have just been in the kernel, right? I can count
Tim Verry said:
> Woody with kernel 2.2.20, newest KDE, updated apache, sendmail, webmin
> installed, other than that pretty basic.
from the rest of your comments i get the idea that you possibly compiled
your own 2.2.20 kernel. the smbfs is part of the kernel not part of
samba. smbfs in samba I
<-- snip -->
| If they are serious they have som kind of vpn or encryption that you can
| connect to. I use ssh myself. you can use fish protocol and browse
| through directories.
| Even better is lftp and fish you can then set eg. bandwidth control.
| Thats what I use when i do big copies for fil
Sunny Dubey wrote:
hey,
On a win2k machine, I have the "d drive" shared as a share called SEC.
However when I try to mount the drive on linux (using the following command)
it just says failed ...
bash-2.05# mount -t smbfs -o username=family,password=family //main/sec
/mnt/smb/
1025: Conn
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 07:43:37PM -0400, Sunny Dubey wrote:
| hey,
|
| On a win2k machine, I have the "d drive" shared as a share called SEC.
| However when I try to mount the drive on linux (using the following command)
| it just says failed ...
|
| bash-2.05# mount -t smbfs -o username=fami
One question/suggestion:
Is samba running from inetd or as a standalone server? That's probably
not directly applicable to your situation (now that I fully read your
email...), but may not hurt.
My W2K memory is fuzzy, but I recall that W2K is setup to time out and
essentially disconnect from the
On Dec 03 2000, Francois Gouget wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Nate Amsden wrote:
> > umount and remount ..
>
>It works!
It's a more or less well known work-around. But I've
unfortunetly had this very same problems with NFS between two
Debian boxes.
I haven't do
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Nate Amsden wrote:
> umount and remount ..
It works!
Why the hell is it that smbumount does not work while umount
works just fine?
> smbfs is VERY unstable i would never trust it to anything ...
I don't trust it very much either. I mostly use it to transfer files
f
umount and remount ..
smbfs is VERY unstable i would never trust it to anything ...
nate
Francois Gouget wrote:
>
>I had a Windows fs mounted on ~/smb via smbfs. The Windows machine
> got put in suspend mode, then woken up, but now I canot access the
> directory anymore:
>
> $ ls smb
> ls:
On Sun, 20 Jun 1999, Kent West wrote:
> Brad wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Kent West wrote:
> >
> > > 4) Will the smbmount (or smbmount-2.2.x) command work over a dial-up
> > > connection? The dial-up connection is provided by my university, and
> > > that's where the server is located. M
Thanks for the response, Brad.
Brad wrote:
>
> On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Kent West wrote:
>
> > Now I can't even find smbclient, and I can't find what package contains
> > it.
>
> Looks like it's in the smbclient package... You may have to look in
> unstable, i don't remember if slink has the proper
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Kent West wrote:
> Now I can't even find smbclient, and I can't find what package contains
> it.
Looks like it's in the smbclient package... You may have to look in
unstable, i don't remember if slink has the proper versions or not.
> My basic questions are these:
> 1) Do I
Alan Su wrote:
>
> when i was about 8, i think i used dos. =) mostly just to launch
> whatever game it was that i was interested in at the time...
>
> so, do those work? i'm also not sure how this applies to my
> situation. thanks.
> "R. Brock Lynn" wrote (Sat, 17 Apr 1999 12:35:29 -0500 ):
>
> so, now i have a question for the list. i guess i can accept this
> behavior, but now i'm curious: what does /bin/mv do when the target
> file already exists (and isn't a directory). it must do something
> other than unlink the target file and relink the source file to that
> name, right? o
As I told Alan in private mail, this is a Windows "feature" which prevents
users from copying over their own files. smbfs must stick to this.
"R. Brock Lynn" wrote (Sat, 17 Apr 1999 12:16:27 -0500 ):
|>
|>Well here's a simple thing to check:
|>
|>Do you have write permission on the SMB share? In windows you can have two
|>passwords... one for read and one for write.
|>
Brock-
thanks for the idea. actually, i'm quite sure i have the co
Alan Su wrote:
>
> hi everyone-
>
> i have a linux box and a win98 box on a network, with the windows box
> exporting a directory via SMB. i use smbmount to mount the share,
> which works fine. the problem arises when i try the following
> operation:
>
> 9:27 [28] alsu (alsu):tmp/salishan99/
On Mon, 12 Apr 1999, Alec Smith wrote:
> From: Alec Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: smbfs on kernel 2.2.5
>
> I'm getting the error need mount version 6 in my dmesg output when using
> kernel 2.2.5. I just built the util-linux-2.9i sources from
> metalab.unc.edu and that didn't help. I have
On 15-Mar-99 Patrick wrote:
>
> does someone has succeeded in mounting remote smb shares with automount ?
>
> i have a debian 2.1 with smbfsx and samba
> but when trying i have in my log only:
> automount[25275]: cannot find mount method for filesystem smbfs
>
> what am i missing ?
>
> thanks f
Hello Patrick.
As I remembered... the automount do not work with the smb shares.
However...what I did is that I edited my script on the startup so it mounts
them automatically and you can remount it or unmount them with this script
which I hacked.
It is located at /etc/init.d/samba file
"Richard B. Talley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip - smbmount problems]
> I learned a new Linux installation needs to be told where to find other
> machines. DNS or a local file (HOSTS ?) or -I switch.
The file is /etc/hosts.
If you install samba you can use nmblookup to find out the addres
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Fredrik Ax wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> >
> > > On 17 Feb 1998, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> > >
> > > > Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > : I'm having trouble with smbfs etc when I try to use
> > > > smbmount to mount a win95
On 19 Feb 98 at 16:21, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Fredrik Ax wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
> >
> > > On 17 Feb 1998, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> > >
> > > > Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > : I'm having trouble with smbfs etc..
On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Fredrik Ax wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Michael Beattie wrote:
>
> > On 17 Feb 1998, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> >
> > > Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > : I'm having trouble with smbfs etc when I try to use smbmount to
> > > mount
>
>
> I guess you
On 17 Feb 1998, Eloy A. Paris wrote:
> Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> : I'm having trouble with smbfs etc when I try to use smbmount to mount
> : a win95 drive, I get the following errors:
> :
> : $ smbmount //[service]/c /mnt -n
> : smb_get_length: Invalid NBT packet
> : smb_
Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I'm having trouble with smbfs etc when I try to use smbmount to mount
: a win95 drive, I get the following errors:
:
: $ smbmount //[service]/c /mnt -n
: smb_get_length: Invalid NBT packet
: smb_dont_catch_keepalive: server->data_ready == NULL
: smb
44 matches
Mail list logo
