Hello,
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 09:08:57AM +0800, jeremy ardley wrote:
> The problem is when I try and configure private keys for ldap TLS the
> permissions are checked and if it's not owned by openldap and permissions
> 400 or 600 the configuration fails.
>
> Is there a known solution to this pro
On Jul 16, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Troy Telford wrote:
> I'm running sid; there was a couple of recent updates to slapd, from 2.4.21-1
> to 2.4.23-1 (and then 2.4.23-2)
>
> The config itself wasn't changed; the backup file made is the same as the
> current one.
>
> However, slapd doesn't start any
Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Hi there.
I've problem setting up SLAPD + TLS and libnss-ldap. When I try to get
the passwd entry with getent passwd I get the following error:
TLS: can't accept: A record packet with illegal version was received..
connection_read(13): TLS accept failure error=-1 id=1
Hi,
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 08:55 -0300, Márcio Luciano Donada wrote:
> I am using a server with debian lenny slapd (OpenLDAP 2.4.11) but when
> I start the process he never opens sub processes for the parent
> process of slapd, a single process is created. Is there a setting for
> this? In / etc /
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:28:46PM +0100, Hanspeter Kunz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a working LDAP-installation (slapd from etch) using simple-bind
> over TLS.
>
> when I try to connect with e.g.
>
> ldapsearch -ZZ -Y EXTERNAL uid=hkunz -LLL
>
> I get
>
> SASL/EXTERNAL authentication started
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> operation, the load average is growing drastic. The log level is -1 but I
Make it zero. It won't help.
> slapd and the end I restarted the machine. The slapd is starting corectly
> but any operation have the same result. But if I make a dpkg -P slap
- Original Message -
From: "Mirko Scurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I get following error:
>
> slapd[1847]: slap_open_listener: socket() failed for AF_INET6 errno=97
> (Address family not supported by protocol)
http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/652.html may help.
Pete
--
To UNS
The conversion process needed to make our tree acceptable to recent
versions of slapd not being something I am going to embark upon on a
Friday evening, downgrading to version 2.0.27-4 seems the most
reasonable course of action. After having wiped the partly upgraded
setup and installed the variou
On Fri, 2003-07-25 at 17:23, Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote:
> I have a testing system (with a handful of packages pinned to unstable).
> During the upgrade I performed today, slapd went from 2.0.27-4 to
> 2.1.22-1. The result is catastrophic :
> - Postfix no longer works properly (I am using ldap virt
9 matches
Mail list logo
