Re: Security Updates

On Wed 09 Mar 2022 at 21:46:45 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 08:28:39PM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > > Dimitrios Papanikolaou wrote: > > > > > > I have Debian 10 (buster) installed in my Nodes. > > > I use the sec repo: > > > > > > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-se

Re: Security Updates

On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 08:28:39PM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote: > Dimitrios Papanikolaou wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have Debian 10 (buster) installed in my Nodes. > > I use the sec repo: > > > > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-securitybuster/updates main contrib > > non-free > > I hope there i

Re: Security Updates

Dimitrios Papanikolaou wrote: > Hi, > > I have Debian 10 (buster) installed in my Nodes. > I use the sec repo: > > deb http://security.debian.org/debian-securitybuster/updates main contrib > non-free I hope there is another / between security and buster. > This is what I have. But can you ex

Re: Security Updates

On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 08:00:51PM +0100, Marek Gráfel wrote: > I also tried the command via the apt-get update terminal, telling me that > the operation is declined. Make sure you run apt-get as root or with sudo: sudo apt-get update Then: sudo apt-get upgrade -- Nazar

Re: Security Updates

On 12/30/18 11:00 AM, Marek Gráfel wrote: I do not know English well, but I hope that the translation through Google Is there a Debian mailing list in your native language? https://lists.debian.org/completeindex.html David

Re: Security Updates

Marek Gráfel wrote: ... > I do not know English well, but I hope that the translation through Google > will be enough to lead me to write a procedure how to install security > updates, and please explain why your Debian freezes despite Linux Mintu? I > think Debian is higher than Linux Mint. Thank

Re: Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

Hi, Alex. On 29/09/17 07:19, Alex ARNAUD wrote: In the last DSA for the chromium-browser package (DSA-3985-1) I noticed that the updates were released for stable, testing and unstable but not for oldstable. I think the same thing happened with the previous update. Ma

Re: Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

Le 28/09/2017 à 19:39, Daniel Bareiro a écrit : Hi, Sven. On 28/09/17 14:13, Sven Joachim wrote: In the last DSA for the chromium-browser package (DSA-3985-1) I noticed that the updates were released for stable, testing and unstable but not for oldstable. I think the same thing happened with t

Re: Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

Hi, Sven. On 28/09/17 14:13, Sven Joachim wrote: >> In the last DSA for the chromium-browser package (DSA-3985-1) I noticed >> that the updates were released for stable, testing and unstable but not >> for oldstable. I think the same thing happened with the previous update. >> >> Maybe I'm missin

Re: Security updates for Chromium on Debian Jessie

On 2017-09-28 11:08 -0300, Daniel Bareiro wrote: > In the last DSA for the chromium-browser package (DSA-3985-1) I noticed > that the updates were released for stable, testing and unstable but not > for oldstable. I think the same thing happened with the previous update. > > Maybe I'm missing some

Re: Security Updates

Hello Paul, Thank you for your kind response to my inquiry. My comments in-line below: On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 14:48:36 +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: >On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: >> >>This page states: >> >>"If y

Re: Security Updates

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 08:16:45 -0700 Larry Dighera wrote: >On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:28:21 +, "Andrew M.A. Cater" > wrote: > >>On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:04:34AM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: >>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:44:27 +, "Andrew M.A. Cate

Re: Security Updates

he considers them irrelevant to his original question. > >Lisi Of course, that is not what I said at all. Here is a copy of the message I sent to Lisi: - To: Lisi Reisz Subject: Re: Security Updates From: Larry Dighera D

Re: Security Updates

On Wednesday 31 August 2016 16:16:45 Larry Dighera wrote: > Have you even looked at the information here: > ?  After reading > that announcement, how can you continue to insist that I am not running > Debian Jessie? That page (URL) confirm

Re: Security Updates

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 08:16:45AM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: > Have you even looked at the information here: > ? After reading > that announcement, how can you continue to insist that I am not running Debian > Jessie? 1) It's not on a

Re: Security Updates

On Wed, 31 Aug 2016 13:28:21 +, "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote: >On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:04:34AM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: >> On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:44:27 +, "Andrew M.A. Cater" >> wrote: >> >> >On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: >> >> >> >> This page

Re: Security Updates

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:18 PM Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 31 August 2016 10:39:53 Lisi Reisz wrote: > > Since you are not replying to anyhting, you may not be subscribed, > > I had a reply off list that said that Larry is not replying to our > questions > because he considers them irrelev

Re: Security Updates

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: This page states: "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be able to access the latest security updates: deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/up

Re: Security Updates

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:04:34AM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: > On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:44:27 +, "Andrew M.A. Cater" > wrote: > > >On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: > >> > >> This page states: > >> > >> "If you

Re: Security Updates

On Wednesday 31 August 2016 10:39:53 Lisi Reisz wrote: > Since you are not replying to anyhting, you may not be subscribed, I had a reply off list that said that Larry is not replying to our questions because he considers them irrelevant to his original question. Lisi > so here > is what I sai

Re: Security Updates

Since you are not replying to anyhting, you may not be subscribed, so here is what I said again: On Tuesday 30 August 2016 20:58:47 Larry Dighera wrote: > This page states: > > "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to

Re: Security Updates

On Tuesday 30 August 2016 20:58:47 Larry Dighera wrote: > This page states: > > "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be > able to access the latest security updates: > > deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/upd

Re: Security Updates

On 8/30/16, Tim McDonough wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Larry Dighera wrote: >> >> This page states: >> >> "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to >> be >> able >> to access the latest security updat

Re: Security Updates

On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 12:58:47PM -0700, Larry Dighera wrote: > > This page states: > > "If you use APT, add the following line to /etc/apt/sources.list to be > able > to access the latest security updates: > > deb http://security.deb

Re: Security Updates

Your Raspberry Pi is most likely running Raspbian and not Debian. Raspbian's updates must be ported by their development team when Debian releases them. At one time they claimed the lag was about a half day to a day behind being released by Debian. Tim On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Larry Dighe

Re: Security updates mirror

On 18/04/2016 15:00, Mark Fletcher wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:42 AM Aero Maxx > wrote: Is this of any help to you ? https://www.debian.org/mirror/list-full#JP Thanks, yes it is. I don't recall seeing the security updates listed in ther

Re: Security updates mirror

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 2:42 AM Aero Maxx wrote: > Is this of any help to you ? > > https://www.debian.org/mirror/list-full#JP > > > > Thanks, yes it is. I don't recall seeing the se

Re: Security updates mirror

On 17/04/2016 12:36, Mark Fletcher wrote: Hello A while back I remember seeing an announcement about a security.debian.org mirror in Japan, but I've misplaced the announcement. Doing aptitude update when you are in Japan and regular old security.debian.org

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Chris Bannister writes: On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 02:27:06PM +1000, Alexis wrote: Christian Seiler writes: >Ok, since there appears to be some kind of confusion, I'll >explain. [snip comprehensive explanatory/summary of what the various official Debian repos are used for] Thank you ver

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 02:27:06PM +1000, Alexis wrote: > > Christian Seiler writes: > > >Ok, since there appears to be some kind of confusion, I'll explain. > > [snip comprehensive explanatory/summary of what the various official Debian > repos are used for] > > Thank you very much for all th

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Christian Seiler writes: Ok, since there appears to be some kind of confusion, I'll explain. [snip comprehensive explanatory/summary of what the various official Debian repos are used for] Thank you very much for all this - it's greatly appreciated! i'd like to suggest that this summary

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

On Monday 04 May 2015 12:31:27 Alexis wrote: > Christian Seiler writes: > > I linked a wiki page in my previous email describing precisely > > what wheezy-updates is (and it is NOT the regular security > > update repository): https://wiki.debian.org/StableUpdates > > Yes, i read that: > > * Since

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Am 2015-05-04 13:31, schrieb Alexis: * Since it mentions things like updates to virus scanners, it seemed plausible to me that it was indeed the same repo. If, as you assert, it's not, then i think it's concerning that there are /two/ distinct repos one needs to enable in order to get all rel

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Lisi Reisz writes: One is security, as it says. The other is what used to be called volatile and is needed if you have e.g. a virus scanner of any kind. Sorry, but as i alluded to in my last email to Christian, this doesn't make sense to me. Shouldn't people reasonably expect virus-scann

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Christian Seiler writes: I linked a wiki page in my previous email describing precisely what wheezy-updates is (and it is NOT the regular security update repository): https://wiki.debian.org/StableUpdates Yes, i read that: * Since it mentions things like updates to virus scanners, it see

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

2015-05-04 13:03 GMT+02:00 Christian Seiler : > Am 2015-05-04 12:30, schrieb Alexis: > >> Further, afaik, the wheezy-updates line should refer to the same set >> of packages as the wheezy/updates line from security.debian.org. If >> that's so, then having two different lines refer to the same pack

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Am 2015-05-04 12:30, schrieb Alexis: Further, afaik, the wheezy-updates line should refer to the same set of packages as the wheezy/updates line from security.debian.org. If that's so, then having two different lines refer to the same package set is merely confusing the config further. If not, th

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

On Monday 04 May 2015 11:30:06 Alexis wrote: > Further, afaik, the wheezy-updates line should refer to the same > set of packages as the wheezy/updates line from > security.debian.org. If that's so, then having two different lines > refer to the same package set is merely confusing the config > fur

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Christian Seiler writes: Am 2015-05-04 12:11, schrieb Alexis: And my guess is that you should also remove the line: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy-updates main Why that? wheezy-updates still exists and if it was in there before, it was probably wanted explicitly. Not necessar

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Am 2015-05-04 12:11, schrieb Alexis: And my guess is that you should also remove the line: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy-updates main Why that? wheezy-updates still exists and if it was in there before, it was probably wanted explicitly. See: https://wiki.debian.org/StableUpdates

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Mathias Friman writes: My sources.list: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy main deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy-updates main ## Backports repository: deb http://http.debian.net/debian/ wheezy-backports main # fusiondi

Re: Security updates for wheezy breaking my FAI-installation

Am 2015-05-04 09:48, schrieb Mathias Friman: recently Ive encountered this problem when doing a server-installation with FAI from CD. There seems to be some security updates that break the dependencies I rely on. As of now Ive disabled the security repository on the install-CD and enable it whe

Re: Security updates for hold package

> - Original Message - > From: Andrei POPESCU > Sent: 05/17/14 05:06 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package > > You haven't yet stated why you need the backports kernel, but if you > want to keep using it insta

Re: Security updates for hold package

On Jo, 15 mai 14, 19:35:40, Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: Andrei POPESCU > > Sent: 05/15/14 04:50 AM > > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > > Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package > > > > > > As

Re: Security updates for hold package

> - Original Message - > From: Andrei POPESCU > Sent: 05/15/14 04:50 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package > > > Assumptions: > 1. You did not change the default priority for backports How does one change "

Re: Security updates for hold package

On Mi, 14 mai 14, 15:59:08, Theodore Alcapotaxis wrote: > I wrote: > > > > However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major > > upgrades (whether you want them or not) unless you point your sources to > > the next release. > > What happens if I am using Debian current stable

Re: Security updates for hold package

What happens if I am using Debian current stable but my linux-image is 3.12 (wheezy-backports)? > - Original Message - > From: Andrei POPESCU > Sent: 05/14/14 05:35 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Security updates for hold package > > However

Re: Security updates for hold package

On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic wrote: >> >> There is a specific squeeze-lts repository? If so, what should be put in >> /etc/apt/sources.list to benefit from the long term support? >> > > https://wiki.debian.org/LTS/Development > Thank you; I did search* but, contrary to the biblical claim, d

Re: Security updates for hold package

On Wed, 14 May 2014 14:16:37 + (UTC) Curt wrote: > On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > > > > Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 < Pin-Priority < 990. But to > > receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to > > include squeeze-lts repo. > > There is a specific sq

Re: Security updates for hold package

On 2014-05-14, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > > Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 < Pin-Priority < 990. But to > receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to > include squeeze-lts repo. There is a specific squeeze-lts repository? If so, what should be put in /etc/apt/sources.l

Re: Security updates for hold package

On 05/14/2014 11:53 AM, Marko Randjelovic wrote: > Pin php packages to a=oldstable, 500 < Pin-Priority < 990. But to > receive security support for squeeze past this month, you have to > include squeeze-lts repo. > Excellent, thanks! Cheers Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...

Re: Security updates for hold package

On Wed, 14 May 2014 11:40:04 +0200 Frank wrote: > On 05/14/2014 11:35 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > > > APT does not differentiate between "major" or "security" or "whatever" > > upgrade, just about version numbers. > > > > However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major > >

Re: Security updates for hold package

On 05/14/2014 11:35 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > > APT does not differentiate between "major" or "security" or "whatever" > upgrade, just about version numbers. > > However, if you're on stable (or oldstable) there will be no major > upgrades (whether you want them or not) unless you point your so

Re: Security updates for hold package

On Wed, 14 May 2014 11:00:30 +0200 Frank wrote: > Hi, > can anybody explain to me what exactly happens if I place a package on > hold? I have an application which unfortunately requires an older php > version. > If I now mark the package "hold" does this mean no major upgrade will be > performed

Re: Security updates for hold package

On Mi, 14 mai 14, 11:00:30, Frank wrote: > Hi, > can anybody explain to me what exactly happens if I place a package on > hold? I have an application which unfortunately requires an older php > version. > If I now mark the package "hold" does this mean no major upgrade will be > performed for this

Re: Security updates are untrusted

Carl Johnson writes: > Carl Johnson writes: > >>> On Thu 24 Apr 2014 at 14:58:52 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: >>> I was just noticing that aptitude warns that a number of packages are listed as untrusted. I checked using 'apt-cache policy' and those >>> >> >> I just now told aptitude to

Re: Security updates are untrusted

On Du, 27 apr 14, 08:48:26, Carl Johnson wrote: > Andrei POPESCU writes: > > > On Sb, 26 apr 14, 10:02:39, Carl Johnson wrote: > >> > >> I was just checking again and the problem had returned. This time, I > >> immediately told aptitude to do an update and the untrusted warnings > >> went away

Re: Security updates are untrusted

Andrei POPESCU writes: > On Sb, 26 apr 14, 10:02:39, Carl Johnson wrote: >> >> I was just checking again and the problem had returned. This time, I >> immediately told aptitude to do an update and the untrusted warnings >> went away again. I suspect they will come back in another day or two, >

Re: Security updates are untrusted

On Sb, 26 apr 14, 10:02:39, Carl Johnson wrote: > > I was just checking again and the problem had returned. This time, I > immediately told aptitude to do an update and the untrusted warnings > went away again. I suspect they will come back in another day or two, > but they don't after just exit

Re: Security updates are untrusted

Carl Johnson writes: > Brian writes: > >> On Thu 24 Apr 2014 at 14:58:52 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: >> >>> I was just noticing that aptitude warns that a number of packages are >>> listed as untrusted. I checked using 'apt-cache policy' and those >> > > I just now told aptitude to do an update,

Re: Security updates are untrusted

On Jo, 24 apr 14, 15:58:20, Carl Johnson wrote: > > I just now told aptitude to do an update, and it appears that all of > those have disappeared now! Maybe I had gotten a bad update the last > time I had updated. That's a likely explanation. > Sorry for the false alarm and thanks for the repl

Re: Security updates are untrusted

Brian writes: > On Thu 24 Apr 2014 at 14:58:52 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: > >> I was just noticing that aptitude warns that a number of packages are >> listed as untrusted. I checked using 'apt-cache policy' and those > > May we see the output that aptitude displays to you? Sorry, I should have

Re: Security updates are untrusted

On Thu 24 Apr 2014 at 14:58:52 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote: > I was just noticing that aptitude warns that a number of packages are > listed as untrusted. I checked using 'apt-cache policy' and those May we see the output that aptitude displays to you? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-re

Re: Security updates during install

On 4/10/07, Mark Panen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Is there any way to bypass the security repo retrival during install as i did not have an internet connection when i installed Etch and apt sat forever waiting going through the differnet security update urls ? When installing on such a sys

Re: security updates download

On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 12:55:11PM -0800, onlineviewer wrote: > Hello All, > > Is there a way to download and save all of the sarge security updates. > I need to burn them to cd. I have a few machines which have no > internet access, so i can not grab them with apt. Suggestions? Sorry I can't be

Re: security updates download

On 13 Feb 2007 12:55:11 -0800, onlineviewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello All, Is there a way to download and save all of the sarge security updates. I need to burn them to cd. I have a few machines which have no internet access, so i can not grab them with apt. Suggestions? apt-zip can wri

Re: Security updates - slight confusion

On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 12:30:06PM +0100, Ken Walker wrote: > I'm getting a little confused about security updates > > I'm using Debian stable and daily do the apt-get update/upgrade. > > But when a package has a security update, do i have to start/stop specific > applications. The pre/post scri

Re: Security updates - slight confusion

On Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:30:06 +0100 Ken Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm getting a little confused about security updates > > I'm using Debian stable and daily do the apt-get update/upgrade. > > But when a package has a security update, do i have to start/stop > specific applications. > >

Re: Security updates - slight confusion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/24/06 06:30, Ken Walker wrote: > I'm getting a little confused about security updates > > I'm using Debian stable and daily do the apt-get update/upgrade. > > But when a package has a security update, do i have to start/stop specific > applicat

Re: Security updates and apt-get

On 6/10/06, Dimitar Vukman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:34:33 +0200 Philippe De Ryck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe you can put together a little script to check for updates and > notify you when there are updates pending. I don't know if something > like this already ex

Re: Security updates and apt-get

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 15:34:33 +0200 Philippe De Ryck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe you can put together a little script to check for updates and > notify you when there are updates pending. I don't know if something > like this already exists? I believe cron-apt does this: --

Re: Security updates and apt-get

On Sat, 2006-06-10 at 15:18 +0200, Lubos Vrbka wrote: > > Very good! > > I will schedule upgrades with crontab plan. > i think this is not very good idea. from time to time, > apt/aptitude/dselect/whatever you will use needs human intervention > during update/upgrade. an error can occur, or other

Re: Security updates and apt-get

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lubos Vrbka wrote: > >> Very good! I will schedule upgrades with crontab plan. > i think this is not very good idea. from time to time, > apt/aptitude/dselect/whatever you will use needs human > intervention during update/upgrade. an error can occur,

Re: Security updates and apt-get

On Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:35:01 +0100 Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > currently, whereas everything was fine, > I have some trouble with secure-testing.debian.net : > deselect/update `Could not connect ... (connection timed out)' > > May be you have a similar issue: > in this

Re: Security updates and apt-get

Very good! I will schedule upgrades with crontab plan. i think this is not very good idea. from time to time, apt/aptitude/dselect/whatever you will use needs human intervention during update/upgrade. an error can occur, or other problems. imho, you should perform the update/upgrade personall

Re: Security updates and apt-get

On 6/10/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michele Della Marina wrote: > On 6/10/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Michele Della Marina wrote: >> > Hello! >> > I use a stable ditribution on my servers, and periodically I make >> >

Re: Security updates and apt-get

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michele Della Marina wrote: > On 6/10/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Michele Della Marina wrote: >> > Hello! >> > I use a stable ditribution on my servers, and periodically I make >> > apt-get update and apt-get upgrade using security.de

Re: Security updates and apt-get

On 6/10/06, Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michele Della Marina wrote: > Hello! > I use a stable ditribution on my servers, and periodically I make > apt-get update and apt-get upgrade using security.debian.org in > sources.list > I think (as

Re: Security updates and apt-get

Hello, currently, whereas everything was fine, I have some trouble with secure-testing.debian.net : deselect/update `Could not connect ... (connection timed out)' May be you have a similar issue: in this case I guess it is better to just report in a few days the operation. hth, Jerome Ron John

Re: Security updates and apt-get

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michele Della Marina wrote: > Hello! > I use a stable ditribution on my servers, and periodically I make > apt-get update and apt-get upgrade using security.debian.org in > sources.list > I think (as I know) that this operation updates the critical pac

Re: Security Updates

Hello *, On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 10:33:58AM -0400, Derek The Monkey Wueppelmann wrote: > Quick question. What security update has caused a whole wack of X > libraries to be updated? I have cron-apt running and this morning at This is DSA-816 (not yet announced, currently pending). > 4:00am nothi

Re: security updates in testing

Rakotomandimby (R12y) Mihamina: > > what's the security policy of Debian testing? Generally, security updates will propagate through unstable just like any other update. Since the release of sarge (or a short time before that), there is also a repository with security updates for testing. Current

Re: security updates

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 23:21:39 +, Rui Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i configured my apt sources.list by apt-setup and i said yes to the questions > about a securityy source but when i run apt-get update it says that the site > isn't there > > what is the line to put in my sources.list file?

Re: security updates

Incoming from Rui Silva: > i configured my apt sources.list by apt-setup and i said yes to the questions > about a securityy source but when i run apt-get update it says that the site > isn't there > > what is the line to put in my sources.list file??? > > i'm running unstable I run stable. M

Re: security updates

Rui Silva wrote: i configured my apt sources.list by apt-setup and i said yes to the questions about a securityy source but when i run apt-get update it says that the site isn't there what is the line to put in my sources.list file??? i'm running unstable There are no security updates for unstab

Re: security updates

on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:56:18PM +0200, Florian Ernst insinuated: > Hello again! > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:10:54PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > i followed your instructions & submitted a patch, [...] > > Looking good, thanks for your contribution. glad to help out! > One last remark for

Re: security updates

Hello again! On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:10:54PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > i followed your instructions & submitted a patch, [...] Looking good, thanks for your contribution. One last remark for future reference: rather copy the original stuff to something like .orig and work on the real file

Re: security updates

on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 06:20:21PM +0200, Florian Ernst insinuated: > Hello again! > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:48:09AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > my patch is below -- what do you think? > > [...] > > This is also the target to use if you want to upgrade a one >

Re: security updates

Hello again! On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:48:09AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > my patch is below -- what do you think? > [...] > This is also the target to use if you want to upgrade a one ^^ > or more already-installed p

Re: security updates

on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 10:01:14AM -0500, David insinuated: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:49:41AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > > on Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:14:01AM +0800, John Summerfield insinuated: > > > Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > > > >reading the debian weekly news, i noticed a couple packages > >

Re: security updates

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:49:41AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > on Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:14:01AM +0800, John Summerfield insinuated: > > Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > >reading the debian weekly news, i noticed a couple packages that i > > >have installed with newly-discovered security holes in them

Re: security updates

on Fri, 20 Aug 2004 01:22:28AM +0200, Florian Ernst insinuated: > Hello! > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:30:50PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > okay, i get it! i didn't understand how this would help until i > > tried it -- what i had been not getting was that apt-get > > installing a package th

Re: security updates

On Thu, Aug 19 at 11:49AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > right, but i can't do that. the rest of my message went on to > say that when i try to apt-get upgrade (i've already > apt-gotten updated), because i haven't done it in so long, apt > tries to upgrade 500+ packagest for me, which i don't hav

Re: security updates

On Thu, Aug 19 at 11:49AM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > on Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:14:01AM +0800, John Summerfield insinuated: > > Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > >reading the debian weekly news, i noticed a couple packages that i > > >have installed with newly-discovered security holes in them. the > > >n

Re: security updates

Hello! On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 02:30:50PM -0400, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > okay, i get it! i didn't understand how this would help until i tried > it -- what i had been not getting was that apt-get installing a > package that i already had installed would upgrade it if it needed to > be upgraded.

Re: security updates

on Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:36:34PM -0400, Greg Folkert insinuated: > On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 11:49, Nori Heikkinen wrote: > [...] > > > > right, but i can't do that. the rest of my message went on to say > > that when i try to apt-get upgrade (i've already apt-gotten updated), > > because i haven't don

Re: security updates

On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 11:49, Nori Heikkinen wrote: [...] > > right, but i can't do that. the rest of my message went on to say > that when i try to apt-get upgrade (i've already apt-gotten updated), > because i haven't done it in so long, apt tries to upgrade 500+ > packagest for me, which i don'

Re: security updates

on Thu, 19 Aug 2004 10:14:01AM +0800, John Summerfield insinuated: > Nori Heikkinen wrote: > > >hey, > > > >reading the debian weekly news, i noticed a couple packages that i > >have installed with newly-discovered security holes in them. the > >newsletter says about these packages "you know th

Re: security updates

Nori Heikkinen wrote: hey, reading the debian weekly news, i noticed a couple packages that i have installed with newly-discovered security holes in them. the newsletter says about these packages "you know the drill." well, i don't ... Assuming you have these deb http://security.debian.org/ st

Re: security updates

On 08/18/04 13:00, Nori Heikkinen wrote: so, what's the Right Way of getting the security patches to these packages, besides apt-get upgrading? is there one? [1] seems to imply that the right way is the way i can't do ... thanks very much, [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-ho

  1   2   >