On 2012-06-08, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> unopkg done.
>> *** glibc detected ***
>> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/../ure-link/bin/uno.bin:
>> double free or corruption (fasttop): 0x7fdf68000fb0 ***
>
> (...)
>
>> Don't know what it all means, but a brief google seems to indic
On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 10:00:00 +, Curt wrote:
> 31 updates today for me, running squeeze, the following message in my
> xterm at installation end:
>
> unopkg done.
> *** glibc detected ***
> /usr/lib/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/../ure-link/bin/uno.bin:
> double free or corruption
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 08:49:04 -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> On 18:09 Sun 09 Mar , Mike Bird wrote:
[...]
> > Sorry Mitchell, there was a slight mistake in the advice given to you.
> > You should not install linux-image-2.6 but rather linux-image-2.6-486
> > or linux-image-2.6-686 (or one o
On 18:09 Sun 09 Mar , Mike Bird wrote:
> On Sun March 9 2008 11:40:57 Mitchell Laks wrote:
> > On 13:57 Sun 09 Mar , Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > Do you have the linus-image-2.6 meta-package installed? If you only
> > > have an actual linux-image deb installed, it will never be upgraded.
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 06:01:50PM -0400, "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:52:50PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Every time I see that kind of message, I just pick the "real" base
> > package that I want.
>
> So does this mean that those metapa
On Sun March 9 2008 11:40:57 Mitchell Laks wrote:
> On 13:57 Sun 09 Mar , Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Do you have the linus-image-2.6 meta-package installed? If you only
> > have an actual linux-image deb installed, it will never be upgraded.
> > The meta-package will always depend on the most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/08 17:01, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:52:50PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/09/08 13:40, Mitchell Laks wrote:
>
>>> I use apt not aptitude ( :( ). I am used to it.
>>> When I try to do
>>> apt-get install linux
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:52:50PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/09/08 13:40, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> > I use apt not aptitude ( :( ). I am used to it.
> > When I try to do
> > apt-get install linux-image-2.6 it tell me that it is a virtual package
> > provided by (the long list of packages).
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:40:57PM -0400, Mitchell Laks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On 13:57 Sun 09 Mar , Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > Do you have the linus-image-2.6 meta-package installed? If you only
> > have an actual linux-image deb installed, it will never be upgraded.
> > Th
On 13:52 Sun 09 Mar , Ron Johnson wrote:
> Every time I see that kind of message, I just pick the "real" base
> package that I want.
>
I agree Ron, I would like to select it myself also. However,
I kind of thought that when you do
apt-get dist-upgrade against security
and there is a major k
On 18:37 Sun 09 Mar , Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> Do you actually have packages from contrib / non-free?
>
> If not, remove those sources and save a few seconds on each update. If
> you do, you better have non-free updates as well.
>
Tzafrir,
Thank you. You have sharp eyes.
On this, hopefully s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/09/08 13:40, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> On 13:57 Sun 09 Mar , Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> Do you have the linus-image-2.6 meta-package installed? If you only
>> have an actual linux-image deb installed, it will never be upgraded.
>> The meta-pack
On 13:57 Sun 09 Mar , Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Do you have the linus-image-2.6 meta-package installed? If you only
> have an actual linux-image deb installed, it will never be upgraded.
> The meta-package will always depend on the most recent version and will
> be updated at the time that the
Unrelated comment:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:08:00PM -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running a minimal install debian machine as a firewall and I would
> like to keep it secure and up to date.
>
> I included
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main non-free
> deb http:/
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:08:00PM -0400, Mitchell Laks wrote:
> I am running a minimal install debian machine as a firewall and I
> would like to keep it secure and up to date.
>
> I included
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main non-free deb
> http://security.debian.org etch/upd
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:08:00 -0400
Mitchell Laks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running a minimal install debian machine as a firewall and I
> would like to keep it secure and up to date.
>
> I included
>
> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ etch main non-free
> deb http://securi
On Thursday 18 September 2003 10:59 am, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:28:18AM -0700, Carla Schroder wrote:
> > I'm running the latest Libranet, which is based on Sarge. I'm confused
> > over the latest round of SSH patches, it looks like they've issued
> > patches for Woody, but
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:28:18AM -0700, Carla Schroder wrote:
> I'm running the latest Libranet, which is based on Sarge. I'm confused over
> the latest round of SSH patches, it looks like they've issued patches for
> Woody, but not Sarge. I know the docs say that security updates for Sarge
>
On Sat, 2003-09-13 at 03:36, Robert Epprecht wrote:
> Robert Epprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have made the security update on a woody box. Now my X seams broken:
> > On the top of the screen there's a region showing garbage and the mouse
> > can be moved, but the mouse keys do not wor
Some extra info. to help whoever may be concerned:
I did the update from inside a screen of multi-gnome terminal while
running X. It worked without any strangeness. I started the upgrade
just before going to bed. This morning it was complete. I read my
mail. Saw the post to which I'm responding. R
Robert Epprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have made the security update on a woody box. Now my X seams broken:
> On the top of the screen there's a region showing garbage and the mouse
> can be moved, but the mouse keys do not work.
After a reboot evrything works again. Strange!
This is Li
On (12/06/03 01:04), Clive Menzies wrote:
> Following the recent security alert I've installed new kernels on 4
> machines including two HP LPro servers, one of which is dual processor.
>
> I installed the corresponding 686 smp kernel and /root is showing:
> vmlinuz -> boot/vmlinuz-2.4.18-1-686-sm
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 11:05:23AM +0100, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> Am Fre, 2002-12-13 um 10.25 schrieb Erno Kuusela:
> > hello,
> >
> > On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> > | > i mean one that you can feed a DSA mail to, and it would check the
> > | > pgp signature and download the up
Am Fre, 2002-12-13 um 10.25 schrieb Erno Kuusela:
> hello,
>
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Matthias Hentges wrote:
> | > i mean one that you can feed a DSA mail to, and it would check the
> | > pgp signature and download the updated packages and verify the md5sums.
> |
> | Well that's what apt-get updat
hello,
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Matthias Hentges wrote:
| > i mean one that you can feed a DSA mail to, and it would check the
| > pgp signature and download the updated packages and verify the md5sums.
|
| Well that's what apt-get update;apt-get upgrade is good for.
actually, it does not check the
Am Fre, 2002-12-13 um 00.10 schrieb Erno Kuusela:
> hello,
>
> before i start on my own, has anyone written a script they would like
> to share for downloading security updates?
>
> i mean one that you can feed a DSA mail to, and it would check the
> pgp signature and download the updated package
Michael Olds wrote:
> >I think he was asking how to switch the source.list file to go fetch
> >from a server rather than his installation CD set. The answer is of
> >course easily found by reading documents on the web site in any case.
>
> He must also comment out (# front of each) each line refe
they will be used over the on line links.
Best Wishes!
Mike Olds www.buddhadust.org
-Original Message-
From: Shyamal Prasad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: security update
"Bob" == Bob Proulx <[EM
"Bob" == Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> Timur V. Irmatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-27
Bob> 14:57:46 +0500]:
>> > Check if you have the following in /etc/apt/sources.list:
>> >
>> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib
>> non-free
Timur V. Irmatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-27 14:57:46 +0500]:
> > Check if you have the following in /etc/apt/sources.list:
> >
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
> >
> > If not, add it. Then:
>
> Something must be added to sources.list, I suppose?
Hmm
On Friday 27 September 2002 11:20, Timur V. Irmatov wrote:
> Hi, people!
>
> I'm just install new Debian 3.0 and I'm happy with it..
> Also, I subscribed to debian-security mailing list and today I've
> recieved recommendation to install new libc6_2.2.5_11.2_i386.deb
>
> I have downloaded package
Timur,
It's easier to just let apt do all the work for you.
Check if you have the following in /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main contrib non-free
If not, add it. Then:
apt-get update
This updates the latest packages for you (including security fixes).
--- Mark Rompies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2001-10-13 21:30):
> I've just use Debian for the first time in my life. I want to upgrade the
> applications or anything to mmake it more secure (i think it will use apps
> >from security.debian.org). The problem is very simple:
>
> what commands should i t
Mark Rompies wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've just use Debian for the first time in my life. I want to upgrade the
> applications or anything to mmake it more secure (i think it will use apps
> from security.debian.org). The problem is very simple:
>
> what commands should i type from the console to updat
You must add a line in your sources list that points to security.debian.org.
Then you can use apt-get
Mark Rompies wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've just use Debian for the first time in my life. I want to upgrade the
> applications or anything to mmake it more secure (i think it will use apps
> from s
yes it works on stable. this i did:
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates main contrib
non-free
thanks for the pointers.
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Watson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 6:29 PM
Subject: Re:
> Why can't you? Have you made the appropriate change to your
> sources.list? IIRC, APT should work just fine with FTP. (Also IIRC,
> APT slightly predates the widespread appearance of HTTP Debian
> mirrors...)
um, because security updates works only with HTTP. i know all what one can
do with
"Rino Mardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is there a way to get security updates using ftp instead of http via
>apt-get?
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security stable/updates main
(Untested - I'm not running stable here - but should work judging from
the directory structure of security.de
* David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> RM> heh. just want we need someone from #linux recommending RTFM. if
> RM> you read my message right, security updates are done via http in
> RM> /etc/apt/sources.list what i'm looking for is if someone has done
> RM>
Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RM> heh. just want we need someone from #linux recommending RTFM. if
RM> you read my message right, security updates are done via http in
RM> /etc/apt/sources.list what i'm looking for is if someone has done
RM> it using ftp as i can't.
Why can't you? Have
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: security update using ftp
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 03:07:43PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
> |Is there a way to get security updates using ftp instead of http via
> |apt-get?
> |
>
> man s
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 03:07:43PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote:
|Is there a way to get security updates using ftp instead of http via
|apt-get?
|
man sources.list
42 matches
Mail list logo
