jeremy bentham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I can only plead that as a recent emigre from slackware land, I
> became dazzled by Debian's slick package-management system and
> began to expect it to read my mind.
Have you looked at Zenwalk? It's a SW downstream, and its netpkg
rivals apt for dazzle
On Nov 19 you wrote:
> On Mon,17.Nov.08, 19:32:42, jeremy bentham wrote:
> > > > My sources.list
> > > > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/ sarge main contrib
> > > > non-free
> > > > per the README at the archive site.
> > > That README is wrong, since there is no debian-archive d
On Mon,17.Nov.08, 19:32:42, jeremy bentham wrote:
> > > My sources.list
>
> > > deb http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/ sarge main contrib non-free
>
> > > per the README at the archive site.
>
> > That README is wrong, since there is no debian-archive directory on
> > archive.debian.org,
jeremy bentham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Please, no {advice, orders} to upgrade to etch. Consider this a
> question about aptitude/sources.list/archives.
Fine. Why would you expect Sarge to work anymore? Just curious.
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
On Nov 18 you wrote:
> On 2008-11-17 23:44 +0100, jeremy bentham wrote:
> > I can't use aptitude anymore.
> > It was working, pre-sarge-archive.
> > Typing aptitude on the command line gives me this:
> > W: Couldn't stat source package list http://archive.debian.org sarge/main
> > Packages (/v
On 2008-11-17 23:44 +0100, jeremy bentham wrote:
> I can't use aptitude anymore.
>
> It was working, pre-sarge-archive.
>
> Typing aptitude on the command line gives me this:
>
> W: Couldn't stat source package list http://archive.debian.org sarge/main
> Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/archive.debian
s. keeling wrote:
Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Can anyone confirm for me that it should be okay for us to repoint
sources.list to archive.d.o for a while, in order to apt-get anything we
Why not just point it at a locally mounted DVD? Then, you'd be safe
from a direct strike on a.d.o (t
Nick Boyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On our last remaining Sarge box (I know, I know ..) my periodic
> [snip]
> Can anyone confirm for me that it should be okay for us to repoint
> sources.list to archive.d.o for a while, in order to apt-get anything we
Why not just point it at a locally mounted D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Elliot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a couple of Sarge servers running bind9(9.2.4-1sarge3) that
> appear to be vulnerable to the DNS cache poisoning issue(Looks like port
> randomization was only introduced in bind9.3?) - As the servers cannot
> be
On 07/09/2008 09:52 PM, John Elliot wrote:
Hi,
We have a couple of Sarge servers running bind9(9.2.4-1sarge3) that
appear to be vulnerable to the DNS cache poisoning issue(Looks like
port randomization was only introduced in bind9.3?) - As the servers
cannot be upgraded at this time to etch,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/08 21:52, John Elliot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a couple of Sarge servers running bind9(9.2.4-1sarge3) that
> appear to be vulnerable to the DNS cache poisoning issue(Looks like port
> randomization was only introduced in bind9.3?) - As the s
Kevin Mark wrote:
[...]
> Security Support for Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (Woody) was terminated one
> year after the release of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (Sarge).
>
> Is Sarge following the same EOL cycle or can one expect a longer period
> of Security Support ?
It will be the same; security support
Steve Kemp wrote:
[...]
Security Support for Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (Woody) was terminated one
year after the release of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (Sarge).
Is Sarge following the same EOL cycle or can one expect a longer period
of Security Support ?
It will be the same; security support ending in
On Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:15:14 +0100, Henrik Johansen wrote:
> Security Support for Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 (Woody) was terminated one
> year after the release of Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 (Sarge).
>
> Is Sarge following the same EOL cycle or can one expect a longer period
> of Security Support ?
It
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:12:11PM +0100, Jens Franik wrote:
>Guten Tag Mattias Wadenstein,
>
>am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 um 10:29 schriebst Du:
>
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r7/
>
>> They are now authorized on the tracker
>
>I put on my seeding this images:
>
>debian-31r7
Guten Tag Mattias Wadenstein,
am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 um 10:29 schriebst Du:
>>> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r7/
> They are now authorized on the tracker
I put on my seeding this images:
debian-31r7-i386-binary-1.iso
debian-31r7-i386-binary-2.iso
debian-31r7-i386-busine
Guten Tag Mattias Wadenstein,
am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 um 10:29 schriebst Du:
> They are now authorized on the tracker, but I don't have the space to seed
> them.
I put the Update-DVD on and after i have downloaded the
other 2 DVD i will seed them for a while.
Anyone who will do the same?
-
Guten Tag Mattias Wadenstein,
am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 um 10:29 schriebst Du:
>> Error(The requested download is not authorised for use with this tracker).
> They are now authorized on the tracker, but I don't have the space to seed
> them. I only have space for the current release and the cu
On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Adrian Levi wrote:
On 19/01/2008, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After a couple of false starts, we finally have the CDs and DVDs built
for the latest sarge (oldstable) point release, 3.1 r7. See
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r7/
On Azureus b
Guten Tag Adrian Levi,
am Samstag, 19. Januar 2008 um 23:35 schriebst Du:
>> After a couple of false starts, we finally have the CDs and DVDs built
>> for the latest sarge (oldstable) point release, 3.1 r7.
>> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r7/
> On Azureus bittorrent I get the
On 19/01/2008, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a couple of false starts, we finally have the CDs and DVDs built
> for the latest sarge (oldstable) point release, 3.1 r7. See
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/3.1_r7/
On Azureus bittorrent I get the error:
Error(The
On Friday 21 December 2007, Sven Joachim wrote:
>...
> Please try to find out where you got
> /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8/Errno.pm from.
>
> Regards,
> Sven
Can't answer for the OP but I've downloaded various perl modules from CPAN
and now my /usr/local/share is no longer arch independent.
On 2007-12-22 05:28 +0100, Cam wrote:
> apt-get dist-upgrade normally works a treat, but having used it lately
> to move from Etch to Lenny (after appropriate /etc/apt/sources.list
> changes) I encountered this ugly situation:
>
> Preparing to replace indent 2.2.9-7 (using .../indent_2.2.9-9_i386.
Thanks, that worked!
> > For a client I need to install Sarge on a server. This needs to be
> > Sarge since their Live server is also running Sarge, and upgrading to
> > Etch is not an option right now.
> One of Kenshi Muto's customized Sarge installer images might work:
>
> http://mirror.home-dn
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:20:54AM +, Najem, Saifeddine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How can I get Netinst for Debian Linux 3.1 sarge?
Beside the question why to install sarge, of course you might have your
reasons, I think I found the latest build for the latest point release
here:
ftp://cdimage.debian.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:20:54AM +, Najem, Saifeddine wrote:
> How can I get Netinst for Debian Linux 3.1 sarge?
Why do you want to install old-stable?
Have you checked the debian-CD ftpsite? See the debian web page.
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 16:46:47 +0200, Pim Bliek wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> For a client I need to install Sarge on a server. This needs to be
> Sarge since their Live server is also running Sarge, and upgrading to
> Etch is not an option right now.
>
> However, this new server has a new Intel chip
Glennie Vignarajah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Le Wednesday 08 August 2007, Aikins, Ronald (Ron) (CIV) disait:
>
> > The default settings for vi have been changed. Display looks weird
> > in terms of colors, etc. Can't figure what vi/vim file needs
> > changing. I have backups of course of all pre-upg
Le Wednesday 08 August 2007, Aikins, Ronald (Ron) (CIV) disait:
> The default settings for vi have been changed. Display looks weird
> in terms of colors, etc. Can't figure what vi/vim file needs
> changing. I have backups of course of all pre-upgrade config
> files. I've tried using the "old" /et
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 20:14:02 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On 07/27/2007 05:55 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:53:54PM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> The "faillog" command doesn't give any output to me, and /var/log/faillog
>>> is still zero bytes.
>> so, what
On 07/27/2007 05:55 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:53:54PM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
[...]
The "faillog" command doesn't give any output to me, and /var/log/faillog
is still zero bytes.
so, what mechanism writes the faillog. Maybe it panics on bad perms?
mine are 06
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 02:53:54PM -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
> On 07/27/2007 09:16 AM, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:50:46 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Hmm. My /var/log/faillog was missing, but even when I 'touch' it, the
>>> behavior doesn't change. My FAILLOG_ENAB is
On 07/27/2007 09:16 AM, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:50:46 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
[...]
Hmm. My /var/log/faillog was missing, but even when I 'touch' it, the
behavior doesn't change. My FAILLOG_ENAB is also "yes" in /etc/login.defs.
Do you get the normal output when you
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 08:50:46 -0500, Mumia W.. wrote:
[...]
> Hmm. My /var/log/faillog was missing, but even when I 'touch' it, the
> behavior doesn't change. My FAILLOG_ENAB is also "yes" in /etc/login.defs.
Do you get the normal output when you run "faillog"?
$ faillog
Login Failure
On 07/27/2007 05:57 AM, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 20:44:49 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I have been using Debian for about 5 years now. As far as I remember, it
always had the "n failur
On 07/26/2007 10:44 PM, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I have been using Debian for about 5 years now. As far as I remember, it
always had the "n failure(s) since last login" message (if n was greater
than zero).
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 20:44:49 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > I have been using Debian for about 5 years now. As far as I remember, it
> > > always had the "n failure(s) since last login" message (i
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > I have been using Debian for about 5 years now. As far as I remember, it
> > always had the "n failure(s) since last login" message (if n was greater
> > than zero).
>
> I have never seen that message.
it work
Florian Kulzer([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 13:51:27 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Mumia W.. wrote:
> > > I'm using Sarge. When I log in, I no longer get a message telling me the
> > > # of failed logins.
> > >
> > > For example, if I try to login but use
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> I have been using Debian for about 5 years now. As far as I remember, it
> always had the "n failure(s) since last login" message (if n was greater
> than zero).
I have never seen that message.
> I never had to do anything to set it up, therefore I
> unfortunately don't kn
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 13:51:27 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Mumia W.. wrote:
> > I'm using Sarge. When I log in, I no longer get a message telling me the
> > # of failed logins.
> >
> > For example, if I try to login but use a wrong password, when I try
> > again using the real password, I shoul
Mumia W.. wrote:
> I'm using Sarge. When I log in, I no longer get a message telling me the
> # of failed logins.
>
> For example, if I try to login but use a wrong password, when I try
> again using the real password, I should see a message saying "1 failed
> login attempts." I no longer get t
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi
Could anyone please point out where to find Sarge install images? I tried
to install it with debootstrap but I can only make it boot on kernel 2.6.8.
When I try to boot on kernel 2.4 it shows the message
/sbin/init 432: cannot open dev/console
I did not find a
On Wed July 4 2007 01:28, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
> Hi
>Could anyone please point out where to find Sarge install images?
I only had a quick look but I couldn't find any sarge install images. They
must exist somewhere but I'm not sure where.
>I
> tried to install it with debootstrap
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 22:58:53 -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> Howdy List,
>
> This being gone at school for 5 months and then trying to fix 6
> computers when I get home all at the same time is getting old. :-)
>
> My latest problem is on a Thinkpad that I upgraded from Sarge to Etch.
> The upgrade in
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:58:53PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
>
> My latest problem is on a Thinkpad that I upgraded from Sarge to Etch.
> The upgrade installed a 2.6.18-*-486 kernel and udev, which I changed to
> a 2.6.18-*-686 kernel (and udev). Now whenever I boot the laptop it has
> a ton of permis
On Thu, 24 May 2007 07:07:50 +1000
Robert S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Yes - when I get back from my trip overseas and am able to fix up
> >> any damage! I assume that packages that are part of etch won't be
> >> affected??
> >
> > Won't be affected by what? The recompilation?
> >
> No - b
>> Yes - when I get back from my trip overseas and am able to fix up any
>> damage! I assume that packages that are part of etch won't be
>> affected??
>
> Won't be affected by what? The recompilation?
>
No - by purging the "obsolete" packages.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Wed, 23 May 2007 23:04:45 +1000
"Robert S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It could indeed wreck locally compiled packages, because aptitude
> > has no idea of the requirements of those packages. Have you
> > considered recompiling them?
> >
>
> Yes - when I get back from my trip overseas and a
> It could indeed wreck locally compiled packages, because aptitude has no
> idea of the requirements of those packages. Have you considered
> recompiling them?
>
Yes - when I get back from my trip overseas and am able to fix up any
damage! I assume that packages that are part of etch won't be a
On Wed, 23 May 2007 22:02:46 +1000
"Robert S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've had a debian machine running for a number of years and I've
> upgraded from woody->sarge->etch.
>
> Looking at the listing in aptitude there are a lot of "obsolete"
> packages - such as gcc-2.95, gcc-3.0, python-2.1,
Hello
Brandon B (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Hopefully someone can help here...
>
> I'm on an R50e Thinkpad with Sarge installed.
>
> I ran an upgrade (note: upgrade not dist-upgrade). Something strange
> happened.
> The file /etc/debian-release states 4.0 now.
>
> In my /etc/apt/apt.conf I
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 09:07 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> Nigel Henry escribió:
> > On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53, you wrote:
> >> nigel henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> What's happened to the repo for Sarge Christian. Folks are getting 404's
> >>> when trying to access it?
> >>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Nigel Henry escribió:
> On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53, you wrote:
>> nigel henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> What's happened to the repo for Sarge Christian. Folks are getting 404's
>>> when trying to access it?
>> Sarge the stable distribution i
> Nigel Henry wrote:
> > I appreciate that Christian. Stable is now asigned to Etch. But do we
> > have access to the Sarge repo, before Etch became stable? I think this
> > equates as old-stable now. it would be a shame to think that all these
> > packages for Sarge were now in the trash, and no l
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 16:30 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> On 04/17/2007 03:08 PM, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 12:45 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> >> No replies? Clear as mud? Let me rephrase my question! :)
> >
> > Make sure these check boxes are checked in the admin interface at
> >
On 04/17/2007 03:08 PM, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 12:45 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
>> No replies? Clear as mud? Let me rephrase my question! :)
>
> Make sure these check boxes are checked in the admin interface at
> http://localhost:631/admin/
>
> Share published printer
On Tue, 2007-04-17 at 12:45 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> No replies? Clear as mud? Let me rephrase my question! :)
Make sure these check boxes are checked in the admin interface at
http://localhost:631/admin/
Share published printers connected to this system
Allow remote administr
lame attempt to help below...
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 12:45:13PM -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> No replies? Clear as mud? Let me rephrase my question! :)
>
> My 2 computer network running sarge on both boxes printed fine until I
> upgraded one box to etch. Now only local printing works.
>
> Box A
No replies? Clear as mud? Let me rephrase my question! :)
My 2 computer network running sarge on both boxes printed fine until I
upgraded one box to etch. Now only local printing works.
Box A runs sarge. Box B with an HP5L printer runs etch.
Box A config files are unchanged. Box B has new e
--- Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:21:12 +0200
> Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is a bit sad. Christian has trashed all the
> available
> > multimedia packages for Sarge since Etch has gone
> stable.
Christian,
Since Sarge will be supported by d
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:21:12 +0200
Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a bit sad. Christian has trashed all the available
> multimedia packages for Sarge since Etch has gone stable. In
> effect. if we want multimedia packages we are being forced to
> upgrade to, at least Etch. I hav
On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 15:53 -0400, Matthew K Poer wrote:
> If sarge is now old-stable (and I think it is), how would we access
> Woody packages?
Here,
http://archive.debian.org/
--
Cheers,
Sven Arvidsson
http://www.whiz.se
PGP Key ID 760BDD22
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sig
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: Sarge packages have disappeared
Date: Sunday 15 April 2007 21:50
From: Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nigel Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nigel Henry wrote:
> On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53, you wrote:
>> nigel henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> What's happened to the repo for Sarge Christian. Folks are getting 404's
>>> when trying to access it?
>> Sarge the stable distribution is now
On Sunday 15 April 2007 20:53, you wrote:
> nigel henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What's happened to the repo for Sarge Christian. Folks are getting 404's
> > when trying to access it?
>
> Sarge the stable distribution is now called etch.
>
> Christian
I appreciate that Christian. Stable is
On 04/13/2007 03:00 PM, Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> On 04/13/2007 10:50 AM, Ralph Katz wrote:
>> See the bug (latest messages),
>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418911 turns
>> out I missed one key step that has trapped others, too.
>
> Has it been considered that we could automate t
On 04/13/2007 10:50 AM, Ralph Katz wrote:
> See the bug (latest messages),
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418911 turns
> out I missed one key step that has trapped others, too.
Has it been considered that we could automate the recommended
steps to upgrade? That would certainly
On 04/13/2007, Dave Ewart wrote:
> What I was getting at, really, was that something hugely fundamental
> must have caused your error at that first stage. There's not enough
See the bug (latest messages),
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=418911 turns out I
missed one key step th
On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 18:30 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> >> - aptitude update (etch sources)
> >> - aptitude upgrade
> >> - see lots of warnings
> >
> > This was your first sign of trouble. And, given that you were not
> > fully committed to an upgrade at that point, it would probably have
>
On 04/12/2007, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 14:13 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
>
>> [bug report]
>
> If I may quote further from your report:
>
>> - aptitude update (etch sources)
>> - aptitude upgrade
>> - see lots of warnings
>
> This was your first sign of trouble. And, given
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 13:02 -0500, Robert J Rae wrote:
> when I try to to install sarge as I have done many times via http, I now
> get warnings about kernel image removal and packages that have failed to
> install, web and mail packages that have worked fine in the past, so a
> little bit of re
On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 14:13 -0400, Ralph Katz wrote:
> [bug report]
If I may quote further from your report:
> - aptitude update (etch sources)
> - aptitude upgrade
> - see lots of warnings
This was your first sign of trouble. And, given that you were not fully
committed to an upgrade at
On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 21:31 +0100, Dave Ewart wrote:
> On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 13:02 -0500, Robert J Rae wrote:
>
> > when I try to to install sarge as I have done many times via http, I
> > now get warnings about kernel image removal and packages that have
> > failed to install, web and
On Thursday, 12.04.2007 at 13:02 -0500, Robert J Rae wrote:
> when I try to to install sarge as I have done many times via http, I
> now get warnings about kernel image removal and packages that have
> failed to install, web and mail packages that have worked fine in the
> past, so a little bit of
Read
http://www.de.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#s-minimal_upgrade
and use 4.5.4.1 or 4.5.4.2, whichever applies to your situation.
Does this work ok?
Doh!
I read those notes too - that's how I managed to upgrade 6 o so boxes
without a problem...just skipp
Pete Clarke wrote:
>
> cholet:~# aptitude dist-upgrade
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree
> Reading extended state information
> Initializing package states... Done
> Some packages had unmet dependencies. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or i
On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 03:15 +0200, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> I have a zaurus which under sarge I could connect to using usbnet and
> hotplug.
This isn't something I have any experience with, but I did find some
instructions for Etch[0], if you want to double check your
configuration, and an old bug
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 01:01:53AM +0200, Andreas Goesele wrote:
> Hi,
>
> doing an upgrade I encountered among others the following problem: I
> so far used apt-get, but following the release notes I switched to
> aptitude. But as a result much to much packages were installed:
> So my question:
On 4/10/07, Tom Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on mysql
upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've played with
the force option before with bad results. Why are the libs that mysql depends
on not upg
try running apt-get -f install for it to suggest a solution. Sometimes it
is smarter than you are (and sometimes not) The force option simply allows
apt-get to function if your package cache is broken. At least try it before
reinstalling etch clean (although that might be fun)
On 4/9/07, Tom B
On Monday 09 April 2007 14:51, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 14:25 -0700, Tom Brown wrote:
> > I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on
> > mysql upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've
> > played with the force option before w
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 14:25 -0700, Tom Brown wrote:
> I tried to uprade a dev server to etch today. The upgrade erred out on mysql
> upgrades. I'm told I might want to run 'apt-get -f install'. I've played with
> the force option before with bad results. Why are the libs that mysql depends
> on
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:54:15PM -0700, Terrence Branscombe wrote:
> Today I followed the official Etch release notes to upgrade from Sarge
> to Etch and all went pretty well, except for some X services, i.e., the
> XDM and XFS services are no longer started at boot, nor can I start them
> man
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:54:15PM -0700, Terrence Branscombe wrote:
> Today I followed the official Etch release notes to upgrade from Sarge
> to Etch and all went pretty well, except for some X services, i.e., the
> XDM and XFS services are no longer started at boot, nor can I start them
> man
Am 2007-03-28 11:49:35, schrieb Chris Bannister:
> [Probably a silly question, but its something that I've been thinking
> about]
It is a realy good question!
> Is there any problems running clients on Sid, but having your servers
> running stable? An example which springs to mind would be postgr
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I just installed Debian Sarge from a 1-year old netinst CD on a HP
> Pavillion 1125LA notebook.
>
> Then I run apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
> What do I have now then? Still Sarge? 3.0, 3.1?
>
The third field in /etc/apt/sources.list will tell you which distrib
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:08:37AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu Mar 29, 2007 at 14:57:47 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 06:50:40PM -0300, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> > > Hi All
> > >
> > > I just installed Debian Sarge from a 1-year old netins
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:25:21PM -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> No really, all new versions are able to communicate with older versions.
> In fact in your server you need is what's more stable so must of servers
> (with Debian) are Sarge or Stable and you can use them even if you're in
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 07:42:27PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:49:35AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> > [Probably a silly question, but its something that I've been thinking
> > about]
> >
> > Is there any problems running clients on Sid, but having your ser
Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
>> You still have sarge, unless you changed the sources.list to
>> point to something else. You've got the most recent sarge w/
>> security updates (I think that is on by default). I guess
>> that's 3.1 r3 or so.
>
> Q: That's because "Etch"
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:16:20 -0300
"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>
> >You still have sarge, unless you changed the sources.list to
> >point to something else. You've got the most recent sarge w/
> >security updates (I think that is on by default). I
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>You still have sarge, unless you changed the sources.list to point to
>something else. You've got the most recent sarge w/ security updates
>(I think that is on by default). I guess that's 3.1 r3 or so.
OK.
Q: That's because "Etch" is not yet "the official latest De
Hi,
On Thu Mar 29, 2007 at 14:57:47 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 06:50:40PM -0300, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I just installed Debian Sarge from a 1-year old netinst CD on a HP
> > Pavillion
> > 1125LA notebook.
> >
> > Then I run apt-get dist
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 06:50:40PM -0300, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I just installed Debian Sarge from a 1-year old netinst CD on a HP Pavillion
> 1125LA notebook.
>
> Then I run apt-get dist-upgrade.
>
> What do I have now then? Still Sarge? 3.0, 3.1?
You still have sarge, unless
Dave Ewart wrote:
On Tuesday, 27.03.2007 at 23:25 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
[Probably a silly question, but its something that I've been
thinking about]
Is there any problems running clients on Sid, but having your
servers running stable? An example which springs to mind would be
On Tuesday, 27.03.2007 at 23:25 -0400, Jose Luis Rivas Contreras wrote:
> > [Probably a silly question, but its something that I've been
> > thinking about]
> >
> > Is there any problems running clients on Sid, but having your
> > servers running stable? An example which springs to mind would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Bannister escribió:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:45:09PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> I started with Debian shortly after Woody was released. I remember
>> being disappointed with the repeated delays of Sarge. However, I stuck
>> with it
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:49:35AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> [Probably a silly question, but its something that I've been thinking
> about]
>
> Is there any problems running clients on Sid, but having your servers
> running stable? An example which springs to mind would be postgreSQL
> wh
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 11:02:53AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> "A. F. Cano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For the longest time, I had been annoyed that shells in a konsole did
> > not execute startup files. The last time this worked was in woody.
>
> Don't know about konsole, but other xte
1 - 100 of 995 matches
Mail list logo
