On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:16:20 -0300 "Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > > >You still have sarge, unless you changed the sources.list to > >point to something else. You've got the most recent sarge w/ > >security updates (I think that is on by default). I guess that's > >3.1 r3 or so. > > OK. > > Q: That's because "Etch" is not yet "the official latest Debian"? > or because dist-upgrade won't ever move ahead from Sarge? > > I've somehow messed up the system baddly when, after having > installed gcc-4.0.2 side-by-side, tried to switch back to > gcc-3.4. I think I screw up but the symlinks or so. > > I figured that if I need to do something drastic (like > re-installing) I better take the oportunity to move ahead to > Etch. > > TIA > > Fernando Cacciola > It all depends how you have your sources.list setup. If the distribution is set to "sarge" then it will always stay with Sarge. If, however, the distribution is set to "stable" then when Etch becomes stable you would have an Etch system. -- Raquel ============================================================ If you would be a real seeker after truth, it is necessary that at least once in your life you doubt, as far as possible, all things. --Rene Descartes -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
