Re: runlevels

2006-11-05 Thread Michael D. Norwick
ChadDavis wrote: > 'dude' ? is that me? I do know what runlevels, sudo and su are. As < snip > >> >> The first thing 'dude' needs to do is figure out what runlevels, >> single-user mode, and 'sudo' or 'su to root' are! >> >> Michael >> http://www.debianhelp.co.uk/runlevels.htm. runlevel 1 is sin

Re: runlevels

2006-11-05 Thread Michael D. Norwick
Kees de Koster wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ChadDavis wrote: > >> Yo. I'm installing a nvidia driver, and the script says you must >> turn off the xserver. In order to this, since I didn't know how, I >> rebooted into runlevel one. Then the script complains about runlevel >> one

Re: runlevels

2006-11-05 Thread Kees de Koster
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ChadDavis wrote: > Yo. I'm installing a nvidia driver, and the script says you must > turn off the xserver. In order to this, since I didn't know how, I > rebooted into runlevel one. Then the script complains about runlevel > one not being enough. Is runlevel on

Re: runlevels

2006-11-05 Thread Rodrigo Paes
On Sun, 5 Nov 2006 10:21:29 -0700 ChadDavis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yo. I'm installing a nvidia driver, and the script says you must > turn off the xserver. In order to this, since I didn't know how, I > rebooted into runlevel one. Then the script complains about runlevel > one not being

Re: runlevels [was: fried(?) computer hangs on boot]

2003-05-30 Thread Kevin McKinley
On Thu, 29 May 2003 19:48:32 -0400 Vikki Roemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for your help, everyone. > > My mom asked me about the problem, so I explained it in as much detail > as I could (she's the only person in the family who's not a computer > person, though), and she's convinced t

Re: runlevels [was: fried(?) computer hangs on boot]

2003-05-30 Thread Vikki Roemer
Thanks for your help, everyone. My mom asked me about the problem, so I explained it in as much detail as I could (she's the only person in the family who's not a computer person, though), and she's convinced that there's something physically wrong with the HD (I dunno why, but that's her belie

Re: runlevels [was: fried(?) computer hangs on boot]

2003-05-29 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:43:25PM -0400, Vikki Roemer wrote: > Pigeon wrote: > >You can use pwck to verify the integrity of your password files. If > >they're OK it appears that login depends on libpam-modules, libpam0g > >and libc6, giving you four things to check / reinstall... > > They're ok.

Re: runlevels [was: fried(?) computer hangs on boot]

2003-05-29 Thread Pigeon
On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 10:34:46AM -0400, Vikki Roemer wrote: > > Well, I would, but I can't log in. I have it booting up now, I get a > login prompt, it'll accept my username, but it hangs trying to > authenticate my password. Do you think this is a problem with login (I > think that's the p

Re: runlevels [was: fried(?) computer hangs on boot]

2003-05-29 Thread Kent West
Vikki Roemer wrote: Kent West wrote: Try "apt-get --reinstall install anacron". Well, I would, but I can't log in. I have it booting up now, I get a login prompt, it'll accept my username, but it hangs trying to authenticate my password. Do you think this is a problem with login (I think

Re: runlevels [was: fried(?) computer hangs on boot]

2003-05-29 Thread Vikki Roemer
Kent West wrote: Vikki Roemer wrote: Did that, got a couple of weird errors, and found out anacron is what's freezing up the system. The errors are: starting blinkenlights: nice: start-stop-daemon: no such file or directory. gdnc unable to make connection to 127.0.0.1:538 -- network is unrea

Re: runlevels [was: fried(?) computer hangs on boot]

2003-05-27 Thread Kent West
Vikki Roemer wrote: < snip re: bootscripts freezing the computer > BTW, what do I do once I find the problem script? Just remove the symlink and then use apt to reinstall it after I get the box back up on its feet? (Hopefully apt and dpkg didn't get fried) Depends on what the problem scr

Re: runlevels [was: fried(?) computer hangs on boot]

2003-05-27 Thread Vikki Roemer
Kent West wrote: Vikki Roemer wrote: Kent West wrote: So boot into single-user mode, or start Linux from the lilo prompt with something like: boot: linux single init=/bin/bash or boot: linux -b (see man init) to start a minimalist system (-b = "emergency"), and see if the machine lasts f

Re: runlevels and XF86Setup??

2001-01-11 Thread Xucaen
--- Mark Blunier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Previously Xucaen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > During the last few weeks, there have been > > discussions about how to keep X from > > automatically starting upon booting the > system. > > Most replys leaned towards disabling xdm in > the > > runlevel d

Re: runlevels and XF86Setup??

2001-01-07 Thread Kent Nyberg
I find it much easier to mess with the initscript with the update-rc.d script. To remove for example xdm from the initscript you enter: 'update-rc.d xdm remove' If do do that, then xdm wont start from init any more. I dont know the exact command but you can do it the other way to, that is, you ca

Re: runlevels and XF86Setup??

2001-01-06 Thread Xucaen
--- "Eric G . Miller" wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:57:57PM -0800, > Xucaen wrote: > > > > --- "Eric G . Miller" wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:12:56PM -0800, > > > Xucaen wrote: > > > > in /etc/rc3.d I canged the symlink of > S99xdm > > > from > > > > ../init.d/xdm to /dev/null

Re: runlevels and XF86Setup??

2001-01-06 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:57:57PM -0800, Xucaen wrote: > > --- "Eric G . Miller" wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:12:56PM -0800, > > Xucaen wrote: > > > in /etc/rc3.d I canged the symlink of S99xdm > > from > > > ../init.d/xdm to /dev/null > > > > Aargh! Don't do that. Just remove the sym

Re: runlevels and XF86Setup??

2001-01-06 Thread Xucaen
--- "Eric G . Miller" wrote: > On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:12:56PM -0800, > Xucaen wrote: > > in /etc/rc3.d I canged the symlink of S99xdm > from > > ../init.d/xdm to /dev/null > > Aargh! Don't do that. Just remove the symlink > S99xdm and XDM will not > be run at boot for the given runlevel. A

Re: runlevels and XF86Setup??

2001-01-06 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:12:56PM -0800, Xucaen wrote: > Hi all!!! > > During the last few weeks, there have been > discussions about how to keep X from > automatically starting upon booting the system. > Most replys leaned towards disabling xdm in the > runlevel directory. This does work. Howeve

Re: runlevels/boot stuff

2001-01-06 Thread David B . Harris
To quote [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg), # You could have just pasted /usr/share/doc/sysvinit/README.runlevels.gz # here .. Does it matter? I was bored, and I think it was helpful. Anyone care to disagree? Dave

Re: runlevels/boot stuff

2001-01-06 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David B. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >To quote "M.B.Midden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ># Im looking for some info about runlevels. Is there a howto for it? >What is ># the best runlevel for a server en when should u switch ( how can you >switch) ># ( i tried man run

Re: runlevels/boot stuff

2001-01-05 Thread David B . Harris
To quote Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, # On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:37:25PM -0500, David B. Harris wrote: # # > /etc/rcS.d/* : General not used manually, it's used to put the system # > into single-user mode right after the kernel has been started. Usually # > entered by typing "linux single"

Re: runlevels/boot stuff

2001-01-05 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:37:25PM -0500, David B. Harris wrote: > /etc/rcS.d/* : General not used manually, it's used to put the system > into single-user mode right after the kernel has been started. Usually > entered by typing "linux single" at the LILO prompt. wrong, rcS.d is run once at boot

Re: runlevels/boot stuff

2001-01-05 Thread Defresne Sylvain
Hello, * M.B.Midden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > hi > > Im looking for some info about runlevels. Is there a howto for it? What is > the best runlevel for a server en when should u switch ( how can you switch) > ( i tried man runlevel ofcourse ) etc man inittab ? Bye -- DEFRESNE Sylvai

Re: runlevels/boot stuff

2001-01-05 Thread David B . Harris
To quote "M.B.Midden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, # Im looking for some info about runlevels. Is there a howto for it? What is # the best runlevel for a server en when should u switch ( how can you switch) # ( i tried man runlevel ofcourse ) etc I'm sort of bored, so here's a little tutorial ;) Each run

Re: Runlevels 2-5 ???, xdm-gdm conflicts.

2000-06-08 Thread Bruce Sass
On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Mark wrote: > 1. Runlevels. ? > Everywhere I read about runlevels in Debian it says the same... > > runlevels 2 through 5 are various multiuser runlevels. > > But... which are which ?. All runlevels are created equal by Debian, until you start fiddling with th

Re: Runlevels 2-5 ???, xdm-gdm conflicts.

2000-06-08 Thread Mark
On 08/06/00 at 14:02 Mark spake the following magic words: ++>Hello All. ++> ++>Sorry to overload this message but I have a few doubts with my (shiny) new ++>installed Debian (potato). ++> ++>1. Runlevels. ? ++>Everywhere I read about runlevels in Debian it says the same... ++> ++>runle

Re: runlevels and modules

1997-01-19 Thread Jaldhar H. Vyas
On Sun, 19 Jan 1997, Jonas Bofjall wrote: > I have two small questions today ;) : > > a) where can I find information about what the >different debian run-levels are used for? >0 is halt, 6 is reboot, 1 is singleuser, but >what about the rest? Are there an multiuser with >X and on