Summary: exposing a troll
On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:48:17AM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 10:35:33AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> } troll tomas wrote:
> } } I think I'm out of it. *Plonk*
> [Adjusting the topic]
>
> > For keeping that promise would it be better t
Hi,
On 2021-08-12 1:17 p.m., Nicolas George wrote:
> Curt (12021-08-12):
>> Certainly. But you did volunteer to comment on a conflictual discussion
>> between a mere pair of users, both of whom violated the Debian mailing
>> list rules. Of these two violations, why you chose to call out the
>> inn
On Thu 12 Aug 2021 at 19:17:42 +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
[...]
> My next mail in this thread will be to give an account of the
> configuration of the printer, but it will have to wait a little that I
> have upgraded the relevant host to Bullseye.
Personally, I look forward to that. Please try
Curt (12021-08-12):
> Certainly. But you did volunteer to comment on a conflictual discussion
> between a mere pair of users, both of whom violated the Debian mailing
> list rules. Of these two violations, why you chose to call out the
> innocuous one, for which a reasonable explanation was given,
On 2021-08-12, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:36:46PM -, Curt wrote:
>>He was also quite wrong, which you fail to point out in all your
>>admirably enthusiastic rectitude
>
> I don't have the spoons to police every poster to the list. I'm fairly
Certainly. But you did vo
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:36:46PM -, Curt wrote:
He was also quite wrong, which you fail to point out in all your
admirably enthusiastic rectitude
I don't have the spoons to police every poster to the list. I'm fairly
sure I've gone a few rounds with Nicolas myself, in the past. If your
po
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021, Charles Curley wrote:
The signal to noise ratio is getting pretty bad around here.
"Around here?"
Every poster brings to the list a bit of the world-at-large as
they are experiencing it. This occurs quite outside of conscious
control. It is pre-reflective behaviour. Can
On 11/08/2021 12:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 August 2021 04:02:14 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
Debian is about choice Polyna. That is mine. Quit monopolizing the
conversation unless you are helping the user SOLVE his/her problem.
+1
--
Tony van der Hoff| mai
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 07:25:40 -0400
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Speaking as one user who would like to see this list go back to being
> a place where howto questions are answered by folks with intimate
> knowledge of how its done, an educational resource, ...
Hear, hear! Well and timely said, Gene.
T
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 06:07:21AM -0700, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>
> On 8/11/21 5:02 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 11/08/2021 12:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>On Wednesday 11 August 2021 04:02:14 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> >>wrote:
> >
> >>Debian is about choice Polyna. That is mine
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:23:53PM -, Curt wrote:
> On 2021-08-11, wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:25:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> This is a mailing list, one I've been subbed to for at least a decade. It
> >> has rules, often violated without realizing it.
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Speaking as one user who would like to see this list go back to being a
> place where howto questions are answered by folks with intimate
> knowledge of how its done, an educational resource, even having healthy
> arguments about methods because we are social creatures and
On 8/11/21 5:02 AM, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
On 11/08/2021 12:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Wednesday 11 August 2021 04:02:14 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
Debian is about choice Polyna. That is mine. Quit monopolizing the
conversation unless you are helping the user SOLVE his/her p
On 2021-08-11, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:02:14AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
> wrote:
>>Seems like kindness or understanding on the flexibility or some rules
>>are hard to understand.
>>
>>I've got told it is okay to act this way on this list because of the
>
On 2021-08-11, wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:25:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> This is a mailing list, one I've been subbed to for at least a decade. It
>> has rules, often violated without realizing it. You come roaring in here
>
> Agreed. Less roaring would be... nicer.
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 07:25:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> This is a mailing list, one I've been subbed to for at least a decade. It
> has rules, often violated without realizing it. You come roaring in here
[...]
Agreed. Less roaring would be... nicer. For all of us :-)
Cheers
-
On Wednesday 11 August 2021 04:02:14 Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-08-11 3:49 a.m., Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> > On 8/11/21, Nicolas George wrote:
> >> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
> >>> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of thi
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 04:02:14AM -0400, Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside wrote:
Seems like kindness or understanding on the flexibility or some rules
are hard to understand.
I've got told it is okay to act this way on this list because of the
number of user who post without being subscriber.
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 4:01 a.m., Nicolas George wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
>> Great for you, I find it rude and offensive.
>>
>> You may think it's wrong
>
> I did not THINK it is wron, I quoted to you the rules of this mailing
> that state explicitly it is wrong.
>
Rule
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 3:49 a.m., Cindy Sue Causey wrote:
> On 8/11/21, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
>>> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of this
>>> mailing list, who could also be considered "part of Debian" gave me the
>>> hint of
Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
> Great for you, I find it rude and offensive.
>
> You may think it's wrong
I did not THINK it is wron, I quoted to you the rules of this mailing
that state explicitly it is wrong.
> The first message I've answered you was sent in CC, that's all.
Hi,
On 2021-08-11 3:41 a.m., Nicolas George wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
>> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of this
>> mailing list, who could also be considered "part of Debian" gave me the
>> hint of replying directly to the user when it come
On 8/11/21, Nicolas George wrote:
> Polyna-Maude Racicot-Summerside (12021-08-11):
>> Sorry if this annoyed yourself but a long time Debian user of this
>> mailing list, who could also be considered "part of Debian" gave me the
>> hint of replying directly to the user when it comes to this mailing
[ It comes back to Jitsi and its license after a few paragraphs. And it
is appalling. ]
The Wanderer (12020-06-10):
> What's with the stray 1, here?
We are in 12020 HE = 2020 CE, HE stands for Holocene Era, or possibly
Human Era, it is just shifted by 1 from the Common Era. As a
consequence,
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:08:36AM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> * From: David Wright
> * Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:10:10 -0600
> > Er, there was at least one posted here within the last week:
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00189.html
> > That's just one that happe
* From: David Wright
* Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 14:10:10 -0600
> Er, there was at least one posted here within the last week:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00189.html
> That's just one that happened to still be in my inbox.
Interesting, thanks. Does the header show
On Ma, 11 feb 20, 10:53:45, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>
> Thanks for challenging my claim. Without your reply I probably
> wouldn't have made the test.
That was certainly not my intention, so I apologize to the list for the
additional traffic.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FA
On Tue 11 Feb 2020 at 07:36:49 (-0800), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>
> * From: Andrei POPESCU
> * Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:43:11 +0200
> > Without In-Reply-To a mail reader has no way to which message the reply
> > belongs, so it's more important than References.
>
> Please look at the W
On Tue 11 Feb 2020 at 10:53:45 (-0800), pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>
> Now we can see the result of the test.
>
> Messages
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00416.html
> and
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00420.html
> both thread back to your reply which threads
Andrei,
Now we can see the result of the test.
Messages
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00416.html
and
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/02/msg00420.html
both thread back to your reply which threads back to my original
message. They have the same References. 416 was i
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 07:49:42AM -0800, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
> This is a deliberate 2nd copy of a message. In-Reply-To is omitted
> from the header to test threading.
>
>
Well you've proven your point. My MUA does indeed thread this in
the correct order.
However, what actually is your poi
This is a deliberate 2nd copy of a message. In-Reply-To is omitted
from the header to test threading.
Andrei,
* From: Andrei POPESCU
* Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:43:11 +0200
> Without In-Reply-To a mail reader has no way to which message the reply
> belongs, so it's more important
Andrei,
* From: Andrei POPESCU
* Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 21:43:11 +0200
> Without In-Reply-To a mail reader has no way to which message the reply
> belongs, so it's more important than References.
Please look at the Web view of your reply. (If your mailer linkifies
this URL, click
On Lu, 10 feb 20, 10:36:18, pe...@easthope.ca wrote:
>
> Given that References includes the In-Reply-To identifier, I'm not
> sure In-Reply-To is necessary for threading.
Without In-Reply-To a mail reader has no way to which message the reply
belongs, so it's more important than References.
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 22:00:39 +0200
Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Jo, 31 oct 19, 11:55:01, The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> > (IMO the correct behavior should be chosen automatically by
> > "reply", and there should be separate "reply to sender", "reply to
> > all", and "reply to list" options in the client
On Jo, 31 oct 19, 11:55:01, The Wanderer wrote:
>
> (IMO the correct behavior should be chosen automatically by "reply", and
> there should be separate "reply to sender", "reply to all", and "reply
> to list" options in the client. I don't know of anything which
> implements that, however.)
I see
Gene Heskett (12019-10-31):
> And this is something that the kmail of yore, now forked to TDE, makes
> simple. If you sort incoming mail to list yy in its own folder, then it
> is sufficient to name that list in the folder definitions. I've been
> doing that for so long I'd consider any email a
On Thursday 31 October 2019 12:10:01 Nicolas George wrote:
> The Wanderer (12019-10-31):
> > IMO, the correct behavior should indeed be the same for lists as for
> > private mail: reply to the source from which you received the
> > message.
>
> ... and everybody who got it too.
>
> For example, if
Andrew McGlashan (12019-11-01):
> Do you also have "ignore list-post:" in your muttrc ?
Of course not. What a strange question: the ignore directive is for
display, not for controlling the recipients.
In case you confused it with ignore_list_reply_to, look at the comment
on its side: "Press L for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 1/11/19 3:10 am, Nicolas George wrote:
> Possible with Mutt:
>
> send-hook . "unmy_hdr Reply-To:" send-hook
> ~cdebian-u...@lists.debian.org my_hdr "Reply-To:
> debian-user@lists.debian.org"
Do you also have "ignore list-post:" in your muttrc
The Wanderer (12019-10-31):
> IMO, the correct behavior should indeed be the same for lists as for
> private mail: reply to the source from which you received the message.
... and everybody who got it too.
For example, if I reply to:
# From: Colleague
# To: Me
# Cc: Boss
it should be:
# From:
On 2018-02-06 10:47:30 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-02-06 at 10:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> > On 2018-02-06 08:49:01 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> On 2018-02-06 at 08:18, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> >>> This is not contradictory with the setting of
> >>> "Mail-Followup-To:".
> >>
On 2018-02-06 at 10:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2018-02-06 08:49:01 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2018-02-06 at 08:18, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>>> This is not contradictory with the setting of
>>> "Mail-Followup-To:".
>>
>> Arguably, if the mailing list does not default replies back to
On 2018-02-06 08:49:01 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2018-02-06 at 08:18, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2018-02-06 14:36:31 +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
> >> On 06/02/18 02:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >>
> >>> You should set up a "Mail-Followup-To:" for that. This is
> >>> entirely your problem
From: joel.r...@gmail.com
> And Now Google Doesn't Think Users Should Ever Set Headers.
> Progress is progress.
Yeah.
Progress is progress.
ahem. Sorry. I guess I forgot something.
{irony}Progress is progress.{end-irony}
--
Joel Rees
If you live in a cave this may actually have some meaning amo
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Fungi4All wrote:
> UTC Time: June 10, 2017 2:13 AM
>
> From: joel.r...@gmail.com
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
>> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people
UTC Time: June 10, 2017 2:13 AM
From: joel.r...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not
On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not if the list is properly configured.
>
> Debian's lists are
On 2017-06-09 at 11:57, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
>
>> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
>> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
>
> Not if the list is properly configured.
What configuration would avoi
Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, The Wanderer a écrit :
> Disagreed. This results in sending extra copies to people who are
> subscribed to the list, which is incorrect.
Not if the list is properly configured.
Debian's lists are badly configured, it results in burden to all users,
but the users
On Friday 09 June 2017 10:47:29 Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit :
> > When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to
> > All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are
> > answering.
>
> This recommendation is un
UTC Time: June 9, 2017 2:47 PM
From: geo...@nsup.org
To: Charlie Kravetz
debian-user@lists.debian.org
Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit :
> When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to
> All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are
>
On 2017-06-09 at 10:47, Nicolas George wrote:
> Le primidi 21 prairial, an CCXXV, Charlie Kravetz a écrit :
>
>> When replying to the mailing list, hit reply. Do not use "Reply to
>> All", since that sends individual emails to the person you are
>> answering.
>
> This recommendation is unsustain
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:38 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jun 2014, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won
and lost many times across the Internet. Pl
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014, david...@ling.ohio-state.edu wrote:
have you looked at alpine's roles? Main menu > Setup > Roles.
Correction: Main menu > Setup > *Rules* > Roles
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
Hi Bret.
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Bret Busby wrote:
On 18/06/2014, Steve Litt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:28:45 +0800
Bret Busby wrote:
Now, if only the list defaulted to "Reply To List", it would be good,
and, make replying to the list, easier...
As far as I know, it does. As far as I kno
On 23/06/2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Bret Busby wrote:
>> Tom H wrote:
>> > Bret Busby wrote:
>> >> Bob Proulx wrote:
>> >>> This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
>> >>> lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
>> >>> here. If you do really w
Bret Busby wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
> > Bret Busby wrote:
> >> Bob Proulx wrote:
> >>> This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
> >>> lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
> >>> here. If you do really want to do so please use the off-topic mail
On 23/06/2014, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>>
>>> This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
>>> lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
>>> here. If you do real
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won
and lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up
again here. If you do really want to
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 13:13:39 -0400
Tom H wrote:
> Requesting that you take a religious-type discussion (like a list's
> "Reply To" settings) to the OT list isn't trolling!
Let's launch Troll-CD, a pure ubuntu distro on a USB key,
multiple points of failure, etc.
--
If we ping Santa, is there
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
>>
>> This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
>> lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
>> here. If you do really want to do so please use the off-
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014, Bob Proulx wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:53:14
From: Bob Proulx
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Reply To settings - was - Re: Debian 7.5 amd64 xfce GUI shutdown
and restart do not work
Bret Busby wrote:
email, for the latter, due to the power of PINE
Bret Busby wrote:
> email, for the latter, due to the power of PINE), and both show no
> presence of a Reply-To value having been set.
This is one of those religious wars that has been fought and won and
lost many times across the Internet. Please don't start it up again
here. If you do really w
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 18:52:08 Bret Busby wrote:
> On 18/06/2014, Steve Litt wrote:
> > On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:28:45 +0800
> >
> > Bret Busby wrote:
> >> Now, if only the list defaulted to "Reply To List", it would be good,
> >> and, make replying to the list, easier...
> >
> > As far as I know
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Bret Busby wrote:
> Where a list (and, I am assuming that the mailing list software for
> this list allows it - from the full header, the mailing list software
> used for this list, is Claws mail) is configured to by default,
> Reply-To the mailing list, it generally is shown i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thveillon.debian wrote:
> Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
>> On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
>>
>> Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
Ron Johnson wrote:
> This works for me:
> http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson/replytolist-0.2.1.xpi
>
> v0.3.0 fails, since I use IMAP.
>
> I think that you need to install the Mnenhy add-on.
Yes, downgrading to 0.2.1 works for me also. I don't think Icedove needs Mnenhy
(but stock Thunderbird
On 09/11/08 02:53, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
never h
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
>
> It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
> never had a problem with it.
Thanks! It wor
On 2008-09-11 09:41, thveillon.debian wrote:
> I have "reply to mailing list 0.3.1" and it works ok with Icedove here.
>
> https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/thunderbird/addon/4455
>
> It is considered "experimental" on Mozilla website I just noticed, but
> never had a problem with it.
Thanks. It doe
Johannes Wiedersich a écrit :
On 2008-09-10 13:31, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
[snip]
I am sorry for having accidentally sent that OT message to list.
Does anyone know, if there is a way of fixing the missing
'reply-to-list' functionally of icedove for lenny?
Since the extension doesn't work an
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 11:04:51AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 02:54:26PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> [..]
> Regarding:
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
>
> > yeah, it's tough. It was also a simply avoided mistake. We all make
> > simple mist
On Saturday 05 April 2008, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> Mark Allums wrote:
> > It's not my mailer, it's me (I use Thunderbird/Mozilla/Icedove),
> > and I have to apologize for it.
>
> Please be considerate to others and use an email client that is aware
> of reply-to-list feature. From
> http://w
Mark Allums wrote:
>
> It's not my mailer, it's me (I use Thunderbird/Mozilla/Icedove), and I
> have to apologize for it.
Please be considerate to others and use an email client that is aware of
reply-to-list feature. From http://wiki.debian.org/ReplyToListEmailClients
there are many email clie
Ron Johnson wrote:
(snip)
>
> >>
> > This first link doesn't work at the moment and the next link doesn't
> > tell me anything useful.
> >> [1]
> >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/t/thunderbird/news/20060812T181723Z.html
> >>
> > I have Thunderbird from sid. How do I activate the ReplyToList
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hello Paul.
>
> Paul Scott, 18.03.2007 19:35:
>> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>>> You don’t need another client since Thunderbird/Icedove has an
>>> extension[0]
>>> which enables you to reply to list only. I’m using it for a long t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/18/07 13:35, Paul Scott wrote:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> Hello Michael.
>> You don’t need another client since Thunderbird/Icedove has an
>> extension[0]
>> which enables you to reply to list only. I’m using it for a long time
>> now. Don’t
>>
Hello Paul.
Paul Scott, 18.03.2007 19:35:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> You don’t need another client since Thunderbird/Icedove has an
>> extension[0]
>> which enables you to reply to list only. I’m using it for a long time
>> now. Don’t
>> worry about the patch mentioned on the site, it’s already i
On Tuesday, 10 January 2006 at 9:42:08 +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 05:41:46PM -0700, Paul Alan Scott wrote:
> >
> > BTW I tried "Reply to list" for this response (from mutt) and discovered
> > it's not that magical. I appararently have to first tell mutt about any
>
Felix Miata wrote:
> Maybe people should be allowed to choose a MUA based on whether its
> entire feature set best meets their overall needs.
Maybe people who choose to use an MUA which is deficient in one area or
another should complain to the authors of the MUA about said deficiencies
instea
Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2005-12-18 07:33:53, schrieb Felix Miata:
> > This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private answers
> > list. You can't have a public discussion when people make their replies
> > private.
> Maybe you should use a RFC-Compliant MUA
> which suppo
Am 2005-12-18 07:33:53, schrieb Felix Miata:
> That's only one admin's opinion. I find the opposite superior:
> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
>
> This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private answers
> list. You can't have a public discussion when people
Felix Miata wrote:
> The default (passive) choice to a public discussion list should always
> be to the list, requiring no more thought than choosing to reply at all.
> Choosing not to reply to the group should require an active choice, not
> a passive choice. Private replies add nothing to the dis
Steve Lamb wrote:
>> Felix Miata wrote:
> >> This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private answers
> >> list. You can't have a public discussion when people make their replies
> >> private.
> And it is up to the individual on how they wish to reply. Quite frankly
> if s
On 2005-12-18, Felix Miata penned:
>
> That's only one admin's opinion. I find the opposite superior:
> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
>
> This is a public discussion list, not a public questions/private
> answers list. You can't have a public discussion when people make
> th
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:36:10 -0800
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Some software does honor list-post and those that don't often have a bug
filed against it for failing to do so.
How comes traditional *nix mailers can handle non-munging AND munging correctly
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:36:10 -0800
Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some software does honor list-post and those that don't often have a bug
> filed against it for failing to do so.
How comes traditional *nix mailers can handle non-munging AND munging correctly
and newer clients (of
On 12/19/05, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Lamb wrote:
> > business. The [b]sender[/b] gets to choose.
>
> This is the result of too much time posting to phpbb forums. Mia culpa!
Could be worse. You could have written:
The
.B sender
gets to choose.
--
Michael A. Marsh
http:
Steve Lamb wrote:
> business. The [b]sender[/b] gets to choose.
This is the result of too much time posting to phpbb forums. Mia culpa!
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of soul
Mike McCarty wrote:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> That's only one admin's opinion. I find the opposite superior:
>> http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
Felix (I know, I'm replying to Mike but attribution is corerct here), this
page is simply outdated. It references 822 and was wri
Gabriel wrote:
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this messag
Felix Miata wrote:
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this message :-P)
No, we sh
Jon Dowland wrote:
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this message :-P)
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 07:33:53AM -0500, Felix Miata wrote:
> Jon Dowland wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
>
> > > And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
> > > That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we s
Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 10:11:43PM -0300, Gabriel wrote:
> > And please, I know sometimes happens, but send the replys to the list.
> > That's why we all should add a reply-to field on the messages we send
> > to the list. (although I forgot to do this with this message :-P)
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Hello Micha,
Am 2005-12-03 20:28:01, schrieb Micha Feigin:
Is it possible with mozilla thunderbird to do reply to list like some other
mailing list friendly email clients can do (such as sylpheed-claws).
No it does not.
But you can:
1) Kill all Mozilla/T
Hello Micha,
Am 2005-12-03 20:28:01, schrieb Micha Feigin:
> Is it possible with mozilla thunderbird to do reply to list like some other
> mailing list friendly email clients can do (such as sylpheed-claws).
No it does not.
But you can:
1) Kill all Mozilla/Thunderbird Core-Developer
2)
Ralph Katz wrote:
Thunderbird uses mbox formats.
In thunderbird:
Edit -> Account Settings -> Add Account -> Movemail ...
Detail and Screenshots:
http://wiki.mozilla.org/Thunderbird:Help_Documentation:Creating_an_Account
I use thunderbird for all mail including system mail and mail from
account
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
