Hi, On 2021-08-12 1:17 p.m., Nicolas George wrote: > Curt (12021-08-12): >> Certainly. But you did volunteer to comment on a conflictual discussion >> between a mere pair of users, both of whom violated the Debian mailing >> list rules. Of these two violations, why you chose to call out the >> innocuous one, for which a reasonable explanation was given, however >> misguided, while ignoring the morally serious infraction (rendering a >> private matter public), is left as the traditional exercise. > > Since you are trying to turn this discussion into a trial against me, I > will clarify a few things. > You are something rarely found in matter of not letting go. Still fighting against the wind.
What about using your energy for something positive ? > I had forgotten that the mailing-list rules state clearly to complain in > private, and I have neglected this rule by mistake. I apologize for it. > > Nonetheless, there are a few details in your accusations that need to be > set straight: > > - The two rules are on exactly the same level in. You choose to call one > innocuous and the other morally serious. This is your judgement, not > universal. What we can objectively say is that one came first, and was > deliberate. > > - If you read carefully, I did not complain of being CCed. Anybody can > forget to edit the headers before sending, I wound not have complained > for so little. In fact, I did not complained, I advised: > Ms Racicot-Summerside did not CC by mistake, she purposefully overrode > a reply-to header, it is a mistake that can have more severe > consequences than an extraneous CC, including replies getting lost or > arriving where they should definitely not arrive. The purpose of my > mail was not to complain, it was to advise. > > I will ask you, if you want to continue piling accusations and reproach > over me, to at least have your facts straight. > > That being said, I am sure I will now remember that this kind of mail is > to be sent in private, and I apologize again for forgetting and thus > wasting everybody's time in a useless discussion that has already been > too long. May I remember yourself what you wrote here ? If it's been so for *too long* then maybe go out for a walk and take some fresh air. Or take a week away from the computer.... > > My next mail in this thread will be to give an account of the > configuration of the printer, but it will have to wait a little that I > have upgraded the relevant host to Bullseye. > > Regards, > -- Polyna-Maude R.-Summerside -Be smart, Be wise, Support opensource development
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
