Re: reiserfs vs ext3fs

2003-10-06 Thread Alan Chandler
On Monday 06 October 2003 15:10, Roberto Sanchez wrote: > Johan Van den Neste wrote: ... > > > > Reiserfs is said to "greatly outperform ext3 on small files". All I can > > say is I'm not unhappy about the performance. ... > > I don't know much about ReiserFS, but I believe that XFS is much more >

Re: reiserfs vs ext3fs

2003-10-06 Thread Roberto Sanchez
Johan Van den Neste wrote: On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 14:06, PF wrote: I found no faq or thread about comparing ReiserFS and Ext3FS for use on laptops. Can someone tell me her/his impressions? I'd like to install a Debian 3.1 on a HP Omnibook and I wish using journaled fs principally to avoid fschk'

Re: reiserfs vs ext3fs

2003-10-06 Thread Johan Van den Neste
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 15:40, Johan Van den Neste wrote: > On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 14:06, PF wrote: > > I found no faq or thread about comparing ReiserFS and Ext3FS for use on > > laptops. > > > > Can someone tell me her/his impressions? I'd like to install a Debian 3.1 on > > a HP Omnibook and I

Re: reiserfs vs ext3fs

2003-10-06 Thread Johan Van den Neste
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 14:06, PF wrote: > I found no faq or thread about comparing ReiserFS and Ext3FS for use on > laptops. > > Can someone tell me her/his impressions? I'd like to install a Debian 3.1 on > a HP Omnibook and I wish using journaled fs principally to avoid fschk's... I've been