Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-05 Thread John Foster
Martin Bialasinski wrote: > You have the package perl, version 5.004-blah installed, not the > package perl5 (which is actually only a virtual package, provided by > the various flavours of the perl-5.00x packages. > > Why do I need perl5 again.. Ah, yes convert-metadata.db needs it. > > Reorga

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-04 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John> the offending file, but then it errored out saying that gmc John> depended on "perl5" and that "perl5" was not installed. What is John> that all about. It is a stable slink system with perl5.00404 John> installed in /usr/bin with symlinks in

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-04 Thread John Foster
Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > * "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John> The problem seems to be this one file, which apparently should > John> be in mc-common (which it is not) and not in either of the other > John> packages. > > No, it should only be in the gmc package, as th

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-04 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John> The problem seems to be this one file, which apparently should John> be in mc-common (which it is not) and not in either of the other John> packages. No, it should only be in the gmc package, as the convert-metadata.db script is also only i

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-04 Thread John Foster
Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > * "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John> (Reading database ... 78011 files and directories currently installed.) > John> Unpacking gmc (from gmc_4.5.42-4_i386.deb) ... > John> dpkg: error processing gmc_4.5.42-4_i386.deb (--install): > John> tryin

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-04 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John> (Reading database ... 78011 files and directories currently installed.) John> Unpacking gmc (from gmc_4.5.42-4_i386.deb) ... John> dpkg: error processing gmc_4.5.42-4_i386.deb (--install): John> trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man1/conve

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-03 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John> As you can guess I have never tried to recompile any debian John> stuff from the sources so I need a little hand holding here. No prob. $ ls mc_4.5.42-3.diff.gz mc_4.5.42-3.dsc mc_4.5.42.orig.tar.gz $ dpkg-source -x mc_4.5.42-3.dsc dpkg

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-03 Thread John Foster
Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > * "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John> Since I have all of these installed-- then I can recompile mc > John> from the source code and it should be OK--is that correct?? > > Yes. If you can get hold of the Debian sources for this version, you >

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-03 Thread John Foster
Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > * "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John> Since I have all of these installed-- then I can recompile mc > John> from the source code and it should be OK--is that correct?? > > Yes. If you can get hold of the Debian sources for this version, you >

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-02 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John> Since I have all of these installed-- then I can recompile mc John> from the source code and it should be OK--is that correct?? Yes. If you can get hold of the Debian sources for this version, you can also recompile the package, instead of

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-02 Thread John Foster
Martin Bialasinski wrote: > > * "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John> Depends: mc-common (= 4.5.40-2.slink.0), libc6, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), > John> slang1 (<< 1.3), slang1 (>> 1.2.2-0) > > John> This has me really perplexed. I can find no reason why the mouse > John> is not

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-02 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John> Depends: mc-common (= 4.5.40-2.slink.0), libc6, libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.0), John> slang1 (<< 1.3), slang1 (>> 1.2.2-0) John> This has me really perplexed. I can find no reason why the mouse John> is not working. It does not depend on libgpmg1.

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-02 Thread John Foster
"Eric G . Miller" wrote: > > I believe icewm-gnome "knows" when it's running under gnome session > management and automatically hides the taskbar. It's assumed that you'd > be using "panel". You can disable this behaviour in > ~/.icewm/preferences but when I did so, the side effects were > undes

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-02 Thread John Foster
Martin Bialasinski wrote: > Does dpkg -s mc show a dependancy on libgpm* ? - output from dpkg -s mc: Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Section: utils Installed-Size: 667 Maintainer: Michael Bramer & Martin Bialasinski <[E

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-01 Thread Eric G . Miller
I believe icewm-gnome "knows" when it's running under gnome session management and automatically hides the taskbar. It's assumed that you'd be using "panel". You can disable this behaviour in ~/.icewm/preferences but when I did so, the side effects were undesirable. Personally, when I use IceWM

Re: problems w/Recent Upgrade to October GNOME

2000-01-01 Thread Martin Bialasinski
* "John" == John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John> 1. It uninstalled my console version of Midnight Commander. I John> reinstalled it again using apt and now my mouse will not work in John> mc. Does dpkg -s mc show a dependancy on libgpm* ? John> 2. The taskbar in icewm-gnome (my personal