On 09/10/11 01:06, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 08/10/11 01:31, Thomas H. George wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:37:04AM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 06/10/11 01:38, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 a
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 12:09:51PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 08/10/11 01:31, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:37:04AM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> On 06/10/11 01:38, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:57:59AM -0400, Alan Greenberger wrote:
>
On 08/10/11 01:31, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:37:04AM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 06/10/11 01:38, Thomas H. George wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:57:59AM -0400, Alan Greenberger wrote:
On 2011-10-03, Thomas H. George wrote:
(...)
Tell us
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 10:37:04AM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 06/10/11 01:38, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:57:59AM -0400, Alan Greenberger wrote:
> >> On 2011-10-03, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >> (...)
> >> Tell us your scanner model? :-)
> >>
> > Epson
On 2011-10-06, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
> Alan's post has broken the thread - but in a previous post I mentioned
> that "The problem seems to be that *both* epson and epson2 backends are
> being called"
>
>
>>> $ grep epson /etc/sane.d/dll.conf
>> epson
>> epson2
>
> This is where epson *and* epson
On 06/10/11 01:38, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:57:59AM -0400, Alan Greenberger wrote:
>> On 2011-10-03, Thomas H. George wrote:
>> (...)
>> Tell us your scanner model? :-)
>>
> Epson Perfection 2400 Photo
>> (...)
>>> Just found the following:
>>>
>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 08:57:59AM -0400, Alan Greenberger wrote:
> On 2011-10-03, Thomas H. George wrote:
> (...)
> >> >> Tell us your scanner model? :-)
> >> >>
> >> > Epson Perfection 2400 Photo
> >>
> >>
> (...)
> > Just found the following:
> >
> >
> > Script started on Mon 03 Oct 2011 03
On 2011-10-03, Thomas H. George wrote:
(...)
>> >> Tell us your scanner model? :-)
>> >>
>> > Epson Perfection 2400 Photo
>>
>>
(...)
> Just found the following:
>
>
> Script started on Mon 03 Oct 2011 03:38:15 PM EDT
> tom@dragon:~$ lsusb -s 001:005
> Bus 001 Device 005: ID 04b8:011b Seiko Ep
On 04/10/11 07:02, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:50:36PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 02/10/11 23:30, Thomas H. George wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 02:49:04PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 02/10/11 03:25, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 a
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:50:36PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 02/10/11 23:30, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 02:49:04PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> On 02/10/11 03:25, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:20:01PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 02:50:36PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 02/10/11 23:30, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 02:49:04PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> >> On 02/10/11 03:25, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:20:01PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
On 02/10/11 23:30, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 02:49:04PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 02/10/11 03:25, Thomas H. George wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:20:01PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
I can run xsane as root but not as user tom although tom is a member
On Sun, Oct 02, 2011 at 02:49:04PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 02/10/11 03:25, Thomas H. George wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:20:01PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> >> I can run xsane as root but not as user tom although tom is a member of
> >> the scanner group. What other group m
On 02/10/11 03:25, Thomas H. George wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:20:01PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
>> I can run xsane as root but not as user tom although tom is a member of
>> the scanner group. What other group membership is required?
>>
> As suggested by responders I have confirmed
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:20:01PM -0400, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I can run xsane as root but not as user tom although tom is a member of
> the scanner group. What other group membership is required?
>
As suggested by responders I have confirmed that I have always been a
member of the scanner g
On 30/09/11 06:20, Thomas H. George wrote:
> I can run xsane as root but not as user tom although tom is a member of
> the scanner group. What other group membership is required?
>
> Tom
>
>
Scanner group is correct.
Did you logout and back in again to activate membership?
You shouldn't requ
I had similar problem. My scaner has to load firmware and the problem
was in permission of file with firmware.
On 09/29/2011 11:20 PM, Thomas H. George wrote:
I can run xsane as root but not as user tom although tom is a member of
the scanner group. What other group membership is required?
To
On Sun, 01 May 2005 03:30:13 +0200, in linux.debian.user you wrote:
>Basically, i change all the dirs and files to rwx for owner, group and
>others.
Just out of curiosity, why in the heck would you do that?
>BTW, in the tick box for permission, what does a shaded box mean?
Tick box? Are you imp
On 4/30/05, hja123 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, i change all the dirs and files to rwx for owner, group and
> others.
>
> BTW, in the tick box for permission, what does a shaded box mean?
Is that all you did? Seems like changing everything to 777 should do
nothing except reduce securi
Basically, i change all the dirs and files to rwx for owner, group and
others.
BTW, in the tick box for permission, what does a shaded box mean?
hja123
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The problem is that the default setting of fstab to /mnt/drive_c and
/mnt/drive_d is read-only. How to set it to read and exec?
James Ng Yuen Sum wrote:
>Hi,
>After I have upgraded from woody to sid (seem i run "apt-get upgrade
>gcc"), the "chmod" command cannot work normally.
>When i am in wood
find /home -xdev | cpio -vdump /mnt, where /mnt was the new partition.
At 04:56 PM 12/9/00 -0800, Nate Amsden wrote:
>Hans wrote:
>>
>> I've moved /home from / to a new partition, but I now find that I can't run
>> certain things, e.g. Staroffice 5.2 and OpenOffice 6.05. I've checked
>> permissio
Hans wrote:
>
> I've moved /home from / to a new partition, but I now find that I can't run
> certain things, e.g. Staroffice 5.2 and OpenOffice 6.05. I've checked
> permissions, groups, fstab, etc. but all seems to be correctly set. And to
> make things even stranger, not even root can install st
Matthew Myers wrote:
>
> I use the FTE editor quite a bit for programming and html, but I have to
> use it as root. I would prefer to be able to use it in my normal
> account. When I try to execute FTE as anyone else but root it gives me
> this error message:
>
> open: Permission Denied
> Faile
24 matches
Mail list logo
