On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 11:07:01 +0800, Lian Liming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am newbie to debian. I tried to recompile the kernel 2.6.8 following a
> debian-kernel-how-to doc.
> And now, i successfully install the new kernel and it can work. But the
> problem now is that modules can't w
Upgrade modutils to latest version.
- Original Message -
From: "Lian Liming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 5:07 AM
Subject: Modules can't work after recompiling the kernel
> Hi all,
> I am newbie to debian. I tried to recompile the kernel 2
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 11:07 +0800, Lian Liming wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am newbie to debian. I tried to recompile the kernel 2.6.8 following a
> debian-kernel-how-to doc.
> And now, i successfully install the new kernel and it can work. But the
> problem now is that modules can't work on my new kernel
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 09:33:45AM -0700, jeffd wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm wondering if the apt-get upgrade missed something, or if I am
> missing something..
You fail to mention which kernel version you're using! If it is 2.6,
make sure you update 'module-init-tools', and at the very least you
run:
de
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:10:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:42:37 -0600, "CW Harris"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> >
> > Is this a typo? or are you using kernel 2.6.7 with an append-to-version
> > of 1? I would recommend you use "-" (hyphen) before numeric
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 10:42:37 -0600, "CW Harris"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:15:29PM +0200, Inge Thorin Eidsæther wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys, and thanks for all your help so far!
> >
.
> > - Modules are found in correct location,that is:
> > /lib/modules/2.6.71, wh
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 12:15:29PM +0200, Inge Thorin Eidsæther wrote:
>
> Hi guys, and thanks for all your help so far!
>
> Observations:
>
> - I misspelled moudule-init-tools as modutils-init-tools.
> Sorry! Did all file searches by correct name, though.
>
> - module-init-tools was installe
Hi guys, and thanks for all your help so far!
Observations:
- I misspelled moudule-init-tools as modutils-init-tools.
Sorry! Did all file searches by correct name, though.
- module-init-tools was installed BEFORE kernel recompile
- A non-initrd kernel image was made
- Documentation/post-halloween
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:41:31PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should b
Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:02:07 -0400, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed,
le in /lib/modules/uname -r directory? If not,
depmod possibly failed, try a depmod -a and then a modprobe again.
HTH
Awais
- Original Message -
From: "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: Re
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 17:02:07 -0400, Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> >
Wim De Smet([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:17:40 -0600, CW Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> [...]
> >
> > You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
> > /etc/modprobe.d. modprobe.conf is just an empty file on my system.
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 07:55:27PM +0200, Wim De Smet wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
>
> You normally don't need a modprobe.conf, everything should be in
> /etc/modprobe.d. modprobe.conf is just an empty file on my system. I'm
Is this true? Mine (a most
Hi,
First of all sorry to the list that I replied directly to the poster.
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 19:27:21 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:47:28 +0200, "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:34:52 +0200,
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:47:28 +0200, "Wim De Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:34:52 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have recently upgraded my Debian system (running testing)
> > from kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 to 2.7.1 by following
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 05:16:27PM -0500, Phil wrote:
> I couldn't get my NIC to work because the module didn't exist in except on
> the internet. (can't logon). I found the module I need (e1000.o) when I
> put SuSE the machine. Can I copy the e1000.o file into the /lib//net/
> directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 20 March 2004 05.13, Chris Lowe wrote:
> Hi
> I have been attempting to install Debian for the first time on my pc.
> But I am having a problem getting the installer to recognise my Via
> VT8237 sata raid controller.
To install woody with
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 09:37:22PM -, Chris Evans wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:28, CW Harris wrote:
>
> > I thought you were using make-kpkg? It does all this for you when you
> > "build" the .deb package.
> So I thought: but it isn't! I think that's because it's picking up a
> .config that
On 1 Mar 2004 at 13:28, CW Harris wrote:
> I thought you were using make-kpkg? It does all this for you when you
> "build" the .deb package.
So I thought: but it isn't! I think that's because it's picking up a
.config that isn't marking the module packages for inclusion
> What are the diff's b
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 06:38:07PM -, Chris Evans wrote:
> On 1 Mar 2004 at 18:27, Martin Wood wrote:
>
> > I think this is exactly where i went wrong the other day.
> >
> > try adding :
> >
> > make modules
> > make modules_install
> >
> > and hopefully your modules will show up
>
> Thank
On 1 Mar 2004 at 18:27, Martin Wood wrote:
> I think this is exactly where i went wrong the other day.
>
> try adding :
>
> make modules
> make modules_install
>
> and hopefully your modules will show up
Thanks Martin. I should have said that I've tried this sequence with
and without that, m
Chris Evans wrote:
More explicit version of earlier request. I installed 2.4.18-bf2.4
kernel from CDROM and then completed installation onto machine from
net. I want to compile the RAID code into the kernel so I can boot
from a mirrored disc array. I download kernel-source2.4.18. I do:
make
Thanks o lot. I see discover running. I'll try installation without
discover and with discover. Since I'm running SCSI/IDE system I'll
compile drivers form my controllers to kernel. No initrd needded
Thanks
Rob Weir wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 11:15:34AM -0500, cdummy said
Hello. I'm new
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 11:15:34AM -0500, cdummy said
> Hello. I'm new with testing. I have a few questions. Please answer or
> send me to proper list. I used daily built of Sarge installer without
> any big problems. Just trouble to get out of setting sources for apt,
> but I did them manualll
On 2004-02-14, cdummy penned:
>
> If I go to /etc/modutils there are no my sound modules to load. When I
> take look on my stock kernel config file above sound modules are
> compiled as modules:
> snip
> # CONFIG_MSNDPIN_HAVE_BOOT is not set
> CONFIG_MSNDPIN_INIT_FILE="/etc/sound/pndspini.bin"
>
Dennis Kaplan wrote:
I just installed the new 2.6 K7 kernel but I can't use it because my serial
mouse does not work.
After doing some researching & reading I got totally confused about modules.
Where I am at:
I think there is a module missing maybe the serial module if there is such a
thing an
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 15:32, Paul M Foster wrote:
> When I was installing Deb 3.0r1 on a new machine, I couldn't find what I
> thought was the right module/driver for the ethernet card, so I just
> skipped it. Later I found the right driver. I can get the card up and
> working. Manually, I can d
On Sun, 2003-11-30 at 21:32, Paul M Foster wrote:
> When I was installing Deb 3.0r1 on a new machine, I couldn't find what I
> thought was the right module/driver for the ethernet card, so I just
> skipped it. Later I found the right driver. I can get the card up and
> working. Manually, I can d
Hello
Paul M Foster (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> When I was installing Deb 3.0r1 on a new machine, I couldn't find what
> I thought was the right module/driver for the ethernet card, so I just
> skipped it. Later I found the right driver. I can get the card up and
> working. Manually, I can do
Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Robert Epprecht (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
>> If I compile different kernels (of the same version) most documents
>> say to rename the /lib/modules/x.x.x/ directory before doing the
>> 'make modules_install' step.
>>
>> How can I boot the system a
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:44:47PM +0200, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> Hello
>
> Robert Epprecht (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
> > I have read different documents about kernel compiling,
> > but something is still not clear to me:
> >
> > If I compile different kernels (of the same version) most do
--- Robert Epprecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > I have read different
documents about kernel compiling,
> but something is still not clear to me:
>
> If I compile different kernels (of the same version) most documents
> say to rename the /lib/modules/x.x.x/ directory before doing the
> 'make
Hello
Robert Epprecht (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I have read different documents about kernel compiling,
> but something is still not clear to me:
>
> If I compile different kernels (of the same version) most documents
> say to rename the /lib/modules/x.x.x/ directory before doing the
> 'mak
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 02:08:55AM -0500, Debian User wrote:
> I just upgraded from potato 2.2.19 to woody and kernel 2.4.18-386. Now
> my modules are gone in modconf? Where to put module path so it will
> show in modconf? I can still insmod but was wondering why the path
> didnt upgrade 2?
>
Le Sun, 17 Nov 2002 09:36:31 -0500
"Thomas H. George" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> After this insmod NVdrivers worked
> but I had to run it after each bootup and then restart xdm. If I
> missed something in this sequence I would appreciate knowing what I
> should have done.
I don't know if we m
Hello,
Am 01:19 2002-11-17 +1100 hat Russell geschrieben:
>
>Thomas H. George,,, wrote:
>> Would someone please point out what I have been too blind to see.
>
>I have an /etc/modules. It is meant to be hand-edited, and is loaded
>at boot time.
Type 'modconf' at the prompt...
michelle
--
To
Thanks for all the responses. I am begining to understand the roles of
the various module files.
For the moment I inserted the line alias char-major-195 NVdriver in
the file /etc/modutils/aliases and then ran modconf so the line is now
included in /etc/modules.conf. With this change xdm runs suc
"Thomas H. George,,," <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is certainly elementary but it baffles me. Although I have
> compiled my kernel with module support set to load modules as needed
> and run make modules and make modules_install,
(Depending on what you're doing, you may find it easier/better
On Saturday 16 November 2002 04:40 am, Thomas H. George,,, wrote:
> It is certainly elementary but it baffles me. Although I have
> compiled my kernel with module support set to load modules as needed
> and run make modules and make modules_install, certain modules never
> loaded when needed. Fo
Thomas H. George,,, wrote:
It is certainly elementary but it baffles me. Although I have compiled
my kernel with module support set to load modules as needed and run make
modules and make modules_install, certain modules never loaded when
needed. For example, the sound card module never load
Damn I hate it when people post with unreliable email addresses, makes it
kinda hard to help them when they don't have accurate addresses...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 24 September 2002 2:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pa
Hi,
Can you please provide further information, what does "lsmod" show when
entered at the command line as root? What make/model of soundcard are you
using? Are you getting any error messages (ie when trying to play an
application that uses sound etc)?. Can you please provide details such as
b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 24 September 2002 17:12, florin wrote:
> Like a new user of Debian(Woody) I dont know how it work.For ex. my
> box(celeron 500) with sound card isa? doesnt play under kernel
> 2.2.20-idepci(it play with SuSE 7.1 and RH 7.3)
> Is it any line
Unlike in RH, there is no autodetection of ISA cards in Debian Woody.
The easiest and most straight forward way is to use modconf. There you
find the necessary modules to make your card work. You'll need ISA
working (pnp) and the sound card module itself. If you remember which
modules were loaded
Stephen,
Thank you!
arts was the cause of the problem.
both /dev/audio and /dev/dsp work well.
Setyo Nugroho
>
> The second is usually a sound server if you're running X - GNOME uses
> ESD, and KDE uses Arts. Try ps ax to see if either is running.
>
> The other is permissions - make sure yo
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 04:52:54PM +0200, Setyo Nugroho wrote:
> I just configured sound modules, such as soundcore etc. The audio works
> fine. The same audio modules were added into /etc/modules, so that
> these modules wil be loaded every time the system is booted.
> After rebooting, the modu
This one time, at band camp, Setyo Nugroho said:
> Am happy to have woody installed, after moving from suse.
> One thing which makes me grabbling for quite sometime. It may take
> sometime to understand the whole scene behind debian and its power.
> Nevertheless I still trust this debian more than
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 02:50:08PM -0700, curtis wrote:
> I just compiled a new kernel (2.4.18) for a machine and installed it.
> Well, when I run modconf, I find that the only available module is
> dummy.o under kernel/drivers/net.
>
> And, in fact, this is the only module listed under
>
AIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:53 AM
Subject: Re: Modules at boot time
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:33:55PM -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I got my sound card to work by doing
> > modprobe trident
> > modprobe sound
> > but I
I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS.
WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
THANK YOU.
- Original Message -
From: "Kapil Khosla" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 5:33 AM
Subject: Modules
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:33:55PM -0400, Kapil Khosla wrote:
> Hi,
> I got my sound card to work by doing
> modprobe trident
> modprobe sound
> but I have to do this everytime at boot time.
> I also did update-modules expecting that it will modify the .conf file and I
> will be all set but that
On Thu May 09, 2002 at 04:57:42PM -0400, Seneca wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:10:05PM +0200, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
> > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:21:22AM -0400, Seneca wrote:
> > > (all my floppies are fat)
> >
> > Hope they still fit into the drive ;-)
>
> They all fit into the driv
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:10:05PM +0200, Joachim Fahnenmueller wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:21:22AM -0400, Seneca wrote:
> > (all my floppies are fat)
>
> Hope they still fit into the drive ;-)
They all fit into the drive, but there's this one floppy... I don't know
how it does it, but it
On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 05:21:22AM -0400, Seneca wrote:
> On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:46:27PM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> > On 8 May 2002, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > possible, right? Create an hourly cron job that does "rmmod -a",
> > > to eliminate any unused modules.
> >
> > If you d
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Seneca wrote:
> I think it would depend upon the kernel. Early in the kernel config,
> there is a question about autoloading modules when needed. I haven't
> tried kernels without it, but whenever fat support is unloaded, if I use
> my floppy (all my floppies are fat), it's loa
On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:46:27PM -0700, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> On 8 May 2002, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> > possible, right? Create an hourly cron job that does "rmmod -a",
> > to eliminate any unused modules.
>
> If you do that, do modules get re-inserted as needed?
I think it would depend
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 02:37:06PM +1100, Graham Williams wrote:
> About a week ago I updated a Debian box, running a custom kernel
> 2.4.16, with a dist-upgrade in unstable (it's been running unstable
> for a long time, and this just brought it up to date).
>
> On the next reboot (a few days late
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Pollywog wrote:
>
> > Warning, loading /lib/modules/2.4.12/pcmcia/i82365.o will taint the kernel:
> > no license
>
> > Anyone know what this is about and how to fix it?
>
> It means a particular module is not GPL. Easiest f
On Sun, 21 Oct 2001, Pollywog wrote:
> Warning, loading /lib/modules/2.4.12/pcmcia/i82365.o will taint the kernel:
> no license
> Anyone know what this is about and how to fix it?
It means a particular module is not GPL. Easiest fix: Don't use it.
--
Baloo
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:46:36AM +, Pollywog wrote:
> I just installed kernel 2.4.12 on my laptop, and when it boots, I get
> the following messages:
> Warning, loading /lib/modules/2.4.12/pcmcia/i82365.o will taint the
> kernel: no license
This is due to kernel/modutil incompatibility. Ther
On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 02:46:36AM +, Pollywog wrote:
> I just installed kernel 2.4.12 on my laptop, and when it boots, I get
> the following messages:
>
> Warning, loading /lib/modules/2.4.12/pcmcia/i82365.o will taint the
> kernel: no license
>
> I get a similar message for pcmcia/ds.o
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> when i boot up i get the message
> modprobe: Note the file etc/modules.conf is more recent than the file
> /lib/modules/2.4.9/modules.dep
run depmod -a or update-modules, both as root.
Regards,
Joey
--
In the beginning was the word, and the word was content-
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 05:11:44PM -0600, Gary Hennigan wrote:
> If you're running potato look at the debian-user list archive. I seem
> to recall a post on how to run a 2.4.x kernel on potato.
That post would be from Adrian Bunk who is maintaining package sets to
allow 2.4.x kernels to work with
"Herbert Pirke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I recently upgraded my Kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.4.7.
> Everything worked fine at the first glance. But when I
> try using functins that are available vie kernel
> modules, I get a message saying "xxx not supported by
> kernel" (or something similar). A m
* Herbert Pirke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010731 19:08]:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded my Kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.4.7.
> checked of course. Modutils is installed of course...
But what version of modutils ?? The dir structure of modules changed
with the 2.4 series of kernels and older modutils won't k
on Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 03:21:09PM -0700, Herbert Pirke ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded my Kernel from 2.2.19 to 2.4.7. Everything worked
> fine at the first glance. But when I try using functins that are
> available vie kernel modules, I get a message saying "xxx not
>
We're drifting towards questions that are more appropriate for debian-user.
Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:41:45AM -0400 wrote:
> > The modules should be on your filesystem already. To install more you can
> > 1 - use 'modconf'
>
> Cool! modconf is great, but how can I select all the modules en masse?
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 11:06:47AM -0700, Michael Dickey wrote:
> After installing the kernel & modules I just compiled
> I find that when booting there are all sorts of error
> messages, most including something about modules.conf
> being more recent than modules.dep. I can only glimpse
> the mess
Thanks. If you look in the help it does say that it supports cs46xx chipsets.
Do
you know
how I could file a bug report for this. (I think it's a bug. After all the
option should say what chipsets it supports without looking in the Help right?)
Thanks again,
Andy
"Keith G. Murphy" wrote:
>
I'm pretty sure it's the item "Crystal Sound Fusion" under "Sound card
support".
Are you using the 2.2.18pre21 kernel source package or some other?
"Andrew D Dixon,,," wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I'm trying to compile support for my sound card into my kernel but I
> can't find an option for it in make
I see it under 2.2.18pre21. It's actually cs46xx.c.
^
Wojciech Milek wrote:
>
> Which kernel do you have? I can't find this module in 2.2.18
>
> W
>
> > Hi All,
> > I'm trying to compile support for my sound card into my kernel but I
> > can't find a
Which kernel do you have? I can't find this module in 2.2.18
W
> Hi All,
> I'm trying to compile support for my sound card into my kernel but I
> can't find an option for it in make config or make xconfig. I have,
> however, found the source for the right driver in sound/driver (it's
> cx46xx
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, David B. Harris wrote:
> To quote "Dean A. Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> # Hello all,
> #
> #I recently configured, compiled, and installed the 2.4.1 kernel.
> So
> # far things are going ok with it.
> #
> # However, modprobe has stopped working correctly, and can't find a
Have you installed the latest modutils?
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Dean A. Roman wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>I recently configured, compiled, and installed the 2.4.1 kernel. So
> far things are going ok with it.
>
> However, modprobe has stopped working correctly, and can't find
To quote "Dean A. Roman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
# Hello all,
#
#I recently configured, compiled, and installed the 2.4.1 kernel.
So
# far things are going ok with it.
#
# However, modprobe has stopped working correctly, and can't find any
# modules.
Chances are, you need a newer version of mo
> From: Martin Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> > ...
> > All of the sudden, various modules don't load when I boot (sound modules
> > for a basic SoundBlaster and ftape).
> >
> > I haven't been messing with my configuration. Things worked last time
> >
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> I have a strange problem.
>
> All of the sudden, various modules don't load when I boot (sound modules
> for a basic SoundBlaster and ftape).
>
> I haven't been messing with my configuration. Things worked last time
> I booted a couple of days ago.
Please don't reply to an existing message when you are starting a new
topic. Some of us use threading mail/news readers, so your message
appears as a response to the message titled "Q: SB16 ok-Need load
other modules?". I notice that most people who do this are running
Micro$oft operating systems
Hi,
is that not something like depmod does, but then better? You have my
support!
Greetz,
Sebastiaan
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, John Griffiths wrote:
> over the last few days i've been wrestling with a lot of cryptic modules. and
> so it would seem have others, judging by the list.
>
> how difficu
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:55:41AM -0600, Benjamin Pharr wrote:
> At 11:28 PM 1/11/01 , Kenward Vaughan wrote:
...
> >Have you just upgraded to the 2.4.0 kernel? If so, you need to make sure
> >you have the latest modutils package as well, as the older version doesn't
> >recognize the 2.4.0 module
» Benjamin Pharr said this and I say that:
> At 11:28 PM 1/11/01 , Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> >Have you just upgraded to the 2.4.0 kernel? If so, you need to make sure
> >you have the latest modutils package as well, as the older version doesn't
> >recognize the 2.4.0 modules directory structure.
At 11:28 PM 1/11/01 , Kenward Vaughan wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 11:01:13PM -0600, Benjamin Pharr wrote:
> I have several modules in the /etc/modules file that are supposed to be
> loaded upon boot. I receive an error message for each one saying that
> can't be loaded. I know they were buil
On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 11:01:13PM -0600, Benjamin Pharr wrote:
> I have several modules in the /etc/modules file that are supposed to be
> loaded upon boot. I receive an error message for each one saying that
> can't be loaded. I know they were built and installed. I have checked and
> they
thanks
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Denzil Kelly wrote:
> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 20:16:36 -0800 (PST)
> From: Denzil Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: dude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Modules and kernel upgrades
&g
Yes, I had this problem a few weeks back. I posted a
message here and here is the fix that worked for me.
Ah! What you have there is a gotcha in the current
Debian
kernel-building
documentation. Most dists put a .config in the linux
directory that
reflects
the options used to build the distribu
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:04:53PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 04 Dec 2000, Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:16:35PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > > However, lsmod and modprobe show nothing: there is no /proc/ksyms or
> > > /proc/modules.
> > > Questions: why don
On 04 Dec 2000, Harry Henry Gebel wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:16:35PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> > However, lsmod and modprobe show nothing: there is no /proc/ksyms or
> > /proc/modules.
> >
> > Questions: why don't these things show up, and how does the kernel work
> > if the module
Hi,
how did you compile the kernel? Basically, it works the following:
make menuconfig (config or xconfig will also work)
make clean
make dep
make bzImage
make modules_install<-- have you done this?
If you are not sure if your new kernel will work, make a copy of the
modules: mv /lib/modules/2
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:16:35PM +, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> However, lsmod and modprobe show nothing: there is no /proc/ksyms or
> /proc/modules.
>
> Questions: why don't these things show up, and how does the kernel work
> if the modules aren't there?
Did you run LILO after you installed
T wrote:
>
> Hi,
> i just got a cd drive for my computer and i was wondering what module i
> should install to use it? It is a 40x Diamond Data. Could someone please
> help me. I also got an internal modem. How do i get it to recognise this?
> When i try to set up a ppp account, it will no
what kind of controller is the cdrom hooked up to? the onboard ide
controller? if so you need no module, if it is hooked up to a sound card
or something you must specify the soundcard or other controller for
someone to assist you.
as for the modem is it a hardware modem? what com port is it set
Chris Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 02:31:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >is there a way to build a specific module from kernel source and install
>> >it? without haveing to build a new kernel and do a make modules and such?
>>
>>
On Mon, May 01, 2000 at 02:31:12PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >is there a way to build a specific module from kernel source and install
> >it? without haveing to build a new kernel and do a make modules and such?
>
> Yes. Do a 'make modules' in the kernel tree,
jason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>is there a way to build a specific module from kernel source and install
>it? without haveing to build a new kernel and do a make modules and such?
Yes. Do a 'make modules' in the kernel tree, then just copy the sound
module (something.o) from wherever it gets bui
On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 10:56:04PM -0500, w trillich wrote
> John Pearson wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Kovacs Istvan wrote
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I've just installed potato, re-compiled the kernel, and now (some of)
> > > my modules will not auto-load. I can load them
John Pearson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2000 at 03:02:42PM +0200, Kovacs Istvan wrote
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've just installed potato, re-compiled the kernel, and now (some of)
> > my modules will not auto-load. I can load them with modprobe and/or
> > insmod. I have to load the driver for my Initio
Looks like you have most of your bases covered. So, what's in
/etc/host.conf? It probably should be like:
order hosts,bind
multi on
It seems that the nameservers aren't being queried. Since, they are
apparently set correctly, this is the last thing I can think of. I think
if it just says "order
Hello!
Thanks to John Pearson and Eric G. Miller for their replies.
[modules not loading]
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 09:32:21 +0930, John Pearson wrote:
>Or, run modconf which will allow you to do the same thing in a
>more GUI way.
Tried it, but it loaded the modules at boot time, and not in
an on-dem
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
