also sprach Gl Elad (on Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:30:38PM +0200):
> irq 9 _is_ irq 2. irq 9 - 16 are handled by a secondary interrupt
> controller, that's connected to the primary one at irq 2, so irq 2 is
> actually the first irq on the second controller, which is irq 9.
well, i knew that but setting
- Original Message -
From: "Gl Elad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MaD dUCK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 8:30 PM
Subject: Re: modem troubles solved
> Hi,
>
> irq 9 _is_ irq 2. irq 9 - 16 are handled by a secondary interr
Hi,
irq 9 _is_ irq 2. irq 9 - 16 are handled by a secondary interrupt
controller, that's connected to the primary one at irq 2, so irq 2 is
actually the first irq on the second controller, which is irq 9.
At 03:21 PM 4/15/01 -0400, you wrote:
hi guys,
sorry for flooding then, for i in {1..1
3 matches
Mail list logo