Hi,
irq 9 _is_ irq 2. irq 9 - 16 are handled by a secondary interrupt
controller, that's connected to the primary one at irq 2, so irq 2 is
actually the first irq on the second controller, which is irq 9.
At 03:21 PM 4/15/01 -0400, you wrote:
hi guys,
sorry for flooding then, for i in {1..15}; do setserial /dev/modem $i;
minicom; done revealed that it is running not off irq 3, but off irq 2.
weird. when connecting, /proc/interrupts reports the serial driver to
use irq 9. oh well, it works...
thanks though if you spent even a second reading my post.
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
don't hate yourself in the morning -- sleep till noon.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
