On Tuesday 14 September 2004 06:35, Eric Dickner wrote:
> --
> Incidentally, if you didn't build your kernel the
> Debian way, did you
> specifically make the modules? If you didn't, you
> won't have modules
> to
> load, even if you specified them in the config.
>
> Justin Guer
--
Incidentally, if you didn't build your kernel the
Debian way, did you
specifically make the modules? If you didn't, you
won't have modules
to
load, even if you specified them in the config.
Justin Guerin
No, I didn't. I just followed th
On Sunday 12 September 2004 20:00, Eric Dickner wrote:
> I have two kernels running, one 2.2.20 installed from
> purchased disks and one 2.4.27 that was created by
> recompiling the "old fashioned" way, ie not by a
> debian package but from the sources that came from
> kernel.org.
>
Be aware that p
dt wrote:
Hello,I've just compiled a custom kernel (installed new HD) and i have a
mystery with modprobe which tells me:
modprobe *
modprobe: Can't locate module vmlinuz.old
I've never heard of using a wildcard with modprobe.
modprobe -l *
[no results]
in /lib/modules/[nameofkernel] i have n
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 06:41:00PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> I've never heard of using a wildcard with modprobe.
> dt wrote:
> >modprobe -l *
> >[no results]
Heck, I'm stupid and I can get this one.
Try modprobe -l '*'.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
> > http://kolrabi.de/files/modconf-linux2.6.0-patch.gz
Great!!! Thanx Nick :)
--
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s+: a-- C++ UL P+ L+++ E W+++ N++ o K- w---
O M- V- PS+ PE- Y- PGP--- t--- 5 X+ R* tv-- b- DI D++
G++ e++ h! r-- y-
--END GEEK CODE BLOCK--
-
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:55:46PM +0200, Bjoern Paetzel wrote:
> Nick Hastings wrote:
>
> >>I have been unable to get modconf to work under 2.6.0-test2 or -test4.
> >>The program runs, but shows only the "exit" option, with no modules
> >>displayed for selecting. Has anyone else seen this sort of
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 17:55, Bjoern Paetzel wrote:
> > Modconf doesn't work with kernels > 2.5. Just use modprobe.
>
> There is a patch for modconf to work with Linux 2.6.0 available at:
>
> http://kolrabi.de/files/modconf-linux2.6.0-patch.gz
>
> HTH :)
>
Under unstable you also need to have m
Nick Hastings wrote:
>>I have been unable to get modconf to work under 2.6.0-test2 or -test4.
>>The program runs, but shows only the "exit" option, with no modules
>>displayed for selecting. Has anyone else seen this sort of problem,and
>>if, any suggestions?
>
>
> Modconf doesn't work with kern
* Neal Lippman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030922 07:55]:
> I have been unable to get modconf to work under 2.6.0-test2 or -test4.
> The program runs, but shows only the "exit" option, with no modules
> displayed for selecting. Has anyone else seen this sort of problem,and
> if, any suggestions?
Modconf
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 06:49, Nick Hastings wrote:
> * CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030909 09:41]:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:07:26PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there a modconf for the 2.6 kenel. The earlier one doesn't work for the
> > > newer kernel.
> >
> > Yup. s
* CaT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030909 09:41]:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:07:26PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a modconf for the 2.6 kenel. The earlier one doesn't work for the
> > newer kernel.
>
> Yup. sid has it.
>
> apt-get -b source module-init-tools
Me thinks not
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 07:07:26PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a modconf for the 2.6 kenel. The earlier one doesn't work for the
> newer kernel.
Yup. sid has it.
apt-get -b source module-init-tools
--
"How can I not love the Americans? They helped me with a flat tire th
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:33:16PM +0100, Yildiz, Murat wrote:
> I have woody 3.0 with kernel 2.4.19 self-compiled and now want to load a
> kernel module but when I run modconf no package is being shown.
> I have checked /lib/modules/2.4.19 , it exist.Where does modconf read
> available modules in
16:51:36 +0100 (MET)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Roberto Pereyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: modconf ; etc/modules and loading modules at boot up (fwd)
>
> Hi
>
> Try with -f option
>
>
> insmod -f module
>
> insmod -f 8139too
>
>
> Thi
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: modconf ; etc/modules and loading modules at boot up
Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:28:37 -0300 (ARST)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
&
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
> > # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> > #
> > # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> > # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> > 8139too.o
> >
> > Ok.
>
> Not okay. T
> #include
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
>
> > # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> > #
> > # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> > # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> > 8139too.o
> >
> > Ok.
>
> Not okay. T
#include
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Mon Feb 11, 2002 um 02:28:34PM:
> # /etc/modules : Kernel modules to load at boot time.
> #
> # This file should contain the name of kernel modules that are
> # to be loaded at boot time, one per line.
> 8139too.o
>
> Ok.
Not okay. Try without .o.
Gruss/Re
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 08:30:54AM -0800, John wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 09:32:49AM -0800, John wrote:
> > When I run modconf:
> >
> > zork:/# modconf
> > zork:/#
> >
> > This is on sid with:
> > Linux zork 2.4.9 #1 Sat Sep 8 10:29:35 PDT 2001 i586 unknown
> >
> > Not sure what more info
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 09:32:49AM -0800, John wrote:
> When I run modconf:
>
> zork:/# modconf
> zork:/#
>
> This is on sid with:
> Linux zork 2.4.9 #1 Sat Sep 8 10:29:35 PDT 2001 i586 unknown
>
> Not sure what more info you need. I do have a strace file at:
>
Nevermind :)
I just installed
On Sat, Nov 03, 2001 at 04:36:17PM -0500, Gianguido Cianci wrote:
> if I do not add the line "3c59x" manually to /etc/modules then the dmesg
> does not contain any trace of eth0. So I guess I need to leave that in
> then??
Yes. /etc/modules is the list of kernel modules (think device drivers,
i
>
Hi Gianguido,
> I am not sure I understand... :
>
> if I do not add the line "3c59x" manually to /etc/modules then the dmesg
> does not contain any trace of eth0. So I guess I need to leave that in
> then??
OK so leave it there (I was wrong telling you that it's compiled into kernel,
it's
Thus spake Gianguido Cianci:
>
> I am not sure I understand... :
>
> if I do not add the line "3c59x" manually to /etc/modules then the dmesg
> does not contain any trace of eth0. So I guess I need to leave that in
> then??
> and carry on with configuring eth0 ...(?)
>
> Also, the position of
I am not sure I understand... :
if I do not add the line "3c59x" manually to /etc/modules then the dmesg
does not contain any trace of eth0. So I guess I need to leave that in
then??
and carry on with configuring eth0 ...(?)
Also, the position of the eth0 part of dmesg with respect to the re
SORRY here is mistake:
> *then copy your new kenel image from /usr/src/arch/i386/boot/bzImage into
> /boot/bzImage
it should be /usr/src/kernel-2.4./arch/i386/
--
I am Martin Kacerovsky, student of the Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
at the Charles University in Prague, i
> >
> >so if insmod works fine it's ok (you can check whether the module is
> >loaded with 'lsmod')
> >if not you must specify io and irq : insmod 3c59x io= irq= >irq>
> >
>
>
> >put the line you have typed as command (above) but without 'insmod' into
> >/etc/modules
> >and make sure you have
so if insmod works fine it's ok (you can check whether the module is
loaded with 'lsmod')
if not you must specify io and irq : insmod 3c59x io= irq=irq>
put the line you have typed as command (above) but without 'insmod' into
/etc/modules
and make sure you have in /etc/rcS.d file as : @S
>
>
Hi Gianguido
> Hi,
>
> I have recently installed Linux for the 1st time...
> I have also managed to figure out that my ethernet card (3Com fast etherLink
> XL 10/100MB 3c905-TX) needs the following driver: 3c59x.o
>
> Hopefully I got this one right
>
> I tried running modconf and add
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 09:06:30PM -, john smith wrote:
|Hi,
|
|I have recompiled my kernel with kerneld support and some modules
|(sound,vfat,etc) then rebooted, executed depmod -a but when I run
|modconf..there is no modules to select from? I have checked in syslog and
|there are no unreso
Scott Patterson wrote:
>
> I recently compiled and installed a 2.4.x kernel using the debian
> kernel-installer package. Everything seems fine except that when I run
> modconf,
> no modules appear. I was hoping to browse my modules this way, but no luck. I
> should mention that my modules do work
Paul McDermott wrote:
> whiptail from the incoming. My question is this how do I get to the
> incoming directory? Does anyone have any ideas in this particular
> situation.
> Paul
>
have you tried ftp://ftp1.us.debian.org/debian/Incoming if it is not there I
had attached the one I had d/l .
go
Paul McDermott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello everyone, I am trying to install modconf but it depends on
> whiptail. Whiptail is not a package. I installed newt0.20 (gave me
> /usr/bin/whiptail) but that did not help. There has been discussion
> abot this topic but no one really knows what
>
> Go to a site that mirrors debian-incoming such as ftp.du.debian.org and
> get the newt and whiptail that you find there.
You must mean ftp.de.debian.org
>
Joop
--
Joop Stakenborg PA3ABA
Linux hamradio software map: http://huizen.dds.nl/~pa3aba
( === Still under construction =
On Thu, Feb 05, 1998 at 11:21:25AM +0100, Frere Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install modconf_0.2.15.deb but I get the message
> "whiptail is not installed"
>
> I have, however, installed newt0.21_0.21-3.deb which has installed
> whiptail.
>
> Have I missed something?
>
> Thanks, Roy
There's a
On Thu, 5 Feb 1998, Frere Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install modconf_0.2.15.deb but I get the message
> "whiptail is not installed"
>
> I have, however, installed newt0.21_0.21-3.deb which has installed
> whiptail.
>
> Have I missed something?
Yes, newt0.21_0.21-4.deb which no longer contai
On Thu, Feb 05, 1998 at 11:21:25AM +0100, Frere Roy wrote:
> I am trying to install modconf_0.2.15.deb but I get the message "whiptail
> is not installed"
>
> I have, however, installed newt0.21_0.21-3.deb which has installed
> whiptail.
With a newer newt release, whiptail is now in a package of
On Mon, 2 Feb 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I went to upgrade and it says the new version of modconf depends on whiptail
> which isn't a package, teh 'i' command shows two different depends though,
> one says newt0.2 (or similiar number) and the other shows whiptail, is this
> a bug? if not wher
38 matches
Mail list logo
