On (29/06/05 08:25), Kristian Rink wrote:> Hi Mike;> > and, at first, thanks loads for your mail.> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:> > > I found it easier not use the mdadm.conf file at all. I simply deleted> > it.> > However, without it, your partitions and/or disks that are going to be> >
On Tuesday 28 June 2005 08:52, Kristian Rink wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> while migrating our mail machine, I am currently learning how to work
> with the new raidtools package based upon mdadm instead of mkraid, and
> currently I'm feeling a little helpless about this. Situations:
>
> * I created a RAID-5
Quoting Kristian Rink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Mike;
and, at first, thanks loads for your mail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
I found it easier not use the mdadm.conf file at all. I simply deleted
it.
However, without it, your partitions and/or disks that are going to be
used in your raid array
On (29/06/05 08:25), Kristian Rink wrote:
> Hi Mike;
>
> and, at first, thanks loads for your mail.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> > I found it easier not use the mdadm.conf file at all. I simply deleted
> > it.
> > However, without it, your partitions and/or disks that are going to be
> > u
Hi Mike;
and, at first, thanks loads for your mail.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> I found it easier not use the mdadm.conf file at all. I simply deleted
> it.
> However, without it, your partitions and/or disks that are going to be
> used in your raid array must be fdisk'd to type "fd" or Linux
Quoting Kristian Rink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi all;
while migrating our mail machine, I am currently learning how to work
with the new raidtools package based upon mdadm instead of mkraid, and
currently I'm feeling a little helpless about this. Situations:
* I created a RAID-5 array using mdadm
6 matches
Mail list logo
