On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
> also from the gentoo link
On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
> also from the gentoo link
On 28 December 2017 at 18:30, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
>
>> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>>
>> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer
>> 13
>> > cooler.
>>
>> I'm just wondering if
On 28 December 2017 at 18:14, deloptes wrote:
> Michael Fothergill wrote:
>
> > I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> > cooler.
>
> I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
> your mother board?
>
This is an interesting ide
Michael Fothergill wrote:
> I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box which uses an Arctic Freezer 13
> cooler.
I'm just wondering if you used the correct switch for the cpu fan - what is
your mother board?
also from the gentoo link
$ grep CONFIG_SENSORS_FAM15H_POWER /boot/config-4.12.10
CONFIG
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On 28 December 2017 at 13:55, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> > root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> > modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
> >
> >
> > This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:11:56PM +, Michael Fothergill wrote:
> root@bong:/boot# sudo modprobe coretemp
> modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'coretemp': No such device
>
>
> This is odd because coretemp is set as a module option in the config file:
>
> CONFIG_SENSORS_CORETEMP=m
>
> Commen
Dear All,
The output of lsmod looks like this:
root@bong:/boot# lsmod
Module Size Used by
uinput 20480 1
snd_hda_codec_hdmi 49152 4
edac_mce_amd 28672 0
edac_core 57344 0
kvm_amd 2179072 0
kvm 589824
Dear All,
I looked at the config-4.9.0-4-amd64 file for the current kernel:
# Native drivers
#
CONFIG_SENSORS_ABITUGURU=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ABITUGURU3=m
# CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7314 is not set
CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7414=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_AD7418=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1021=m
CONFIG_SENSORS_ADM1025=m
CONFIG_SENSORS
I have 3 case fans in the box here but lm-sensors only sees two of them
apparently as well as not seeing the cpu fan.
Funny stuff.
Regards
MF
On 28 December 2017 at 11:50, Michael Fothergill <
michael.fotherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Folks,
>
> I am running stretch on an AMD FX8350 box whic
Darac Marjal writes:
> It might be, for those motherboards that don't report any
> information, that they simply don't have the sensors.
It shows system and CPU temperature, fan speeds and other things in the
BIOS, and the RAID controller now shows me the temperature of the
attached disks which
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:13:08AM +0200, lee wrote:
> Darac Marjal writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:14:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
> >>
[cut]
> >
> > (This is a summary of my searching the web for "ACPI: resource
> > f71882fg")
>
> Yeah I've found the same results, and they don't tell me if
Darac Marjal writes:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:14:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
>>
>> [ 12.509295] f71882fg: Found f71889fg chip at 0x600, revision 21
>> [ 12.509364] ACPI: resource f71882fg [io 0x0600-0x0607] conflicts with
>> ACPI region HMOR [io 0x605-0x606]
>> [ 12.509372] ACPI: If an AC
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 02:14:29PM +0200, lee wrote:
>
> [ 12.509295] f71882fg: Found f71889fg chip at 0x600, revision 21
> [ 12.509364] ACPI: resource f71882fg [io 0x0600-0x0607] conflicts with
> ACPI region HMOR [io 0x605-0x606]
> [ 12.509372] ACPI: If an ACPI driver is available for thi
On April 4, 2007 10:39:31 am Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While Installing lm-sensors package on my Etch using
>
> 2.6.18-4-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Mar 26 11:36:53 CEST 2007 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> kernel. I got the following message
>
> ==
>
> To m
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 19:27:21 +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> I ported this patch to the latest git, I hope this can help to get it
> merged.
>
> I'm just wondering if it is right to export the functions msr_read and
> msr_write from arch/i386/kernel/msr.c, or if it would be better to
On 26.03.06 15:57, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Sarge just updated the lm-sensors library.
>
> That's a bind because I modified that library to support my mobo, which
> has an unsupported sensor chip.
sorry, security updates fixes only security problems, they do NOT add any
functionality (unless tha
On 9/15/05, wim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanx for your help...I compiled a new kernel 2.6.13 and it is working now... strange...How to get, config while using sarge?-- L.V.Gandhi
http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/linux user No.205042
Thanx for your help...
I compiled a new kernel 2.6.13 and it is working now... strange...
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 09:16:56AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> wim wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm trying to get lm-sensors working on my PII 400Mhz
> >The motherboard is an Asus AX6BC
> >
>
> Why don't you ju
wim wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to get lm-sensors working on my PII 400Mhz
The motherboard is an Asus AX6BC
Why don't you just add
gl518sm
i2c-isa
to /etc/modules and reboot?
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2005/9/13, wim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm also trying to insert the module for the GL518SM Chipset, but tha's
> failing. Could this be a bug in the driver?
>
> slayer:~# insmod /lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/kernel/drivers/i2c/chips/gl518sm.ko
> insmod: error inserting
> '/lib/modules/2.6.8-2-686/ke
Johannes Graumann wrote:
Hello,
I recently got lm-sensors to play along with my stock unstable 2.6.8
kernel. Now I'm looking for a daemon which utilizes the information read
from the Mobo. I have found two which do what I want (shutting down at
certain threshold values):
1) sentinelle (http://denis
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 03:12:52PM -0700, Johannes Graumann wrote:
> I recently got lm-sensors to play along with my stock unstable 2.6.8
> kernel. Now I'm looking for a daemon which utilizes the information read
> from the Mobo. I have found two which do what I want (shutting down at
> certain thr
hugo vanwoerkom wrote:
Alex Lorca wrote:
A note on the jpeg images: the jumps in temperature occur because I turn
an external fan on/off. That makes a huge difference in CPU temps. It
was noted in this list a while ago: best is to maintain positive
pressure inside the case with a fan: you keep
Alex Lorca wrote:
hi all
i'm trying to install lm-sensors in a debian woody 2.4.25
i made:
- apt-get lm-sensors-source i2c-source
- unpack and make-kpkg modules-image
- install the .debs
- run sensors-detect and detected the following:
# 2C adapter drivers
# modprobe unknown adapter Philips Parall
"C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any one got any advice how to get lmsensors working on a 2.4.21-5-k7
> kernel?
My best advice is to build your kernel from source, disable anything
and everything i2c-related in the kernel source, and then install the
lm-sensors-source and i2c-source packages and
Menno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> fakeroot debian/rules kdist_image \
> >> KSRC=/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.18-1-686 \
> >> KVERS=2.4.18-1-686 KDREV=2.4.18-11
>
> > This ignores the kernel-source package you
> > installed entirely, incidentally.
> > But if it works, that's good to hear.
>> fakeroot debian/rules kdist_image \
>> KSRC=/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.18-1-686 \
>> KVERS=2.4.18-1-686 KDREV=2.4.18-11
> This ignores the kernel-source package you
> installed entirely, incidentally.
> But if it works, that's good to hear.
But somehow it is depending on this. I got the followi
Menno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I believe unstable's make-kpkg has
> > some support for building kernel modules given
>
> I use stable, and there is some kind of support in it. According to
> the docs in /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/README.modu
David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe unstable's make-kpkg has
> some support for building kernel modules given
I use stable, and there is some kind of support in it. According to the
docs in /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/README.modules is should do something
like this:
make-kpkg
"no-spam" == no-spam writes:
no-spam> Should I compile it from the lm-sensors-source package?
no-spam> What is the easiest way to do this?
It's been two years, but I downloaded the lm-sensors-source package
and built it following the instructions that came with the package
(for the
Menno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Until recently I have used the packages:
> kernel-image-2.4.18-686 2.4.18-5
> lm-sensors-2.4.18-686 2.6.3-5+2.4.18-5
> (from http://people.debian.org/~blade/misc/modules-i386/2.4.18-686/ )
> lm-sensors2.6.3-5
> libsensors1
Hello
Menno (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Until recently I have used the packages:
> kernel-image-2.4.18-686 2.4.18-5
> lm-sensors-2.4.18-686 2.6.3-5+2.4.18-5
> (from http://people.debian.org/~blade/misc/modules-i386/2.4.18-686/ )
> lm-sensors2.6.3-5
> libsensor
Hi there!
you may use 'apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686' and you'll install
all the needed packages.
Regards
Menno wrote:
Hi,
Until recently I have used the packages:
kernel-image-2.4.18-6862.4.18-5
lm-sensors-2.4.18-6862.6.3-5+2.4.18-5
(from http://people.debian.org/~b
"Tit \"Black\" Petric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> im running latest sid (regularely updated), and i installed lm-sensors just
> now. the sensors-detect report that i should load "i2c-viapro" which is
> quite right, but that module doesnt exist under the installed kernel.
>
> is there any way to
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Once you've scoped out the lm-sensors situation, go here for hints on
> building that kernel with kernel-package:
>
> http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
>
> Kevin
I eventally got bored enough to test out what a make-kpkg would do,
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003, Troy Arnold wrote:
> > Two:
> >
> > Is this ASUS P4B533 supported by the i2c/lmsensors found in Sid?
>
> As the README says, lm-sensors doesn't support /motherboards/, it supports
> /chips/. To find out for sure you'd need to look in your motherboard
Doh, wrong semantics on m
On Fri, 4 Apr 2003 14:21:15 -0500 (EST)
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked for various howto's, but they all assume you're running prebuilt
> kernels, unfortunately.
Once you've scoped out the lm-sensors situation, go here for hints on
building that kernel with kernel-package:
ht
Mike Dresser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How are you supposed to install the lm-sensors-source when you compile
> your own kernels. the resulting file from make-kpkg modules_install
> depends on kernel-image-2.4.20. I just --force-depends'd it in, I assume
> that's not the proper way.
This wo
Interesting... I just battled lm-sensors last night. :)
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 02:21:15PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> One:
>
> How are you supposed to install the lm-sensors-source when you compile
> your own kernels. the resulting file from make-kpkg modules_install
> depe
Thakns for the reply, so what I did:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 13:42:47 -0500
David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Sorry to post this message twice..
| > I'm unable to get lm-sensors working.
| > MB asus P4T533-R with P4.
| > Installed lm-sensors-source, c
mess-mate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry to post this message twice..
> I'm unable to get lm-sensors working.
> MB asus P4T533-R with P4.
> Installed lm-sensors-source, compiled, patched the kernel and reinstalled
> the kernel (2.4.20) inclusif i2c.
Maybe you could explain in a little more d
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 the mental interface of
Kjetil Kjernsmo told:
> On Monday 16 December 2002 19:58, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
[...]
> >
> > make-kpkg modules_image. The Kernel was built also with make-kpkg.
>
> Uh-oh, you're saying that if I've got any modules, then I have to run
> make-kpk
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
On Monday 16 December 2002 19:58, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Most people lose on step two, it appears. If you built modules
using 'make-kpkg modules-image', did you install the resulting
package? If you're using sid, 'sudo debian/rules modules-nokpkg'
should Just Work if
On Monday 16 December 2002 19:58, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > Most people lose on step two, it appears. If you built modules
> > using 'make-kpkg modules-image', did you install the resulting
> > package? If you're using sid, 'sudo debian/rules modules-nokpkg'
> > should Just Work if you're all
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002 the mental interface of
David Z Maze told:
> Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> > 1 I installed lm-sensors, lm-sensors-source and i2c-source
> > 2 compiled the modules
> > 3 Did a lm-sensors detect
>
> Most people lose on step two, it appears. If you b
Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i just wanted to use lm-sensors to check voltages, temperatures ..
Do you actually have (supported) sensor hardware? My laptop, for
example, doesn't, though my desktop machine does.
> 1 I installed lm-sensors, lm-sensors-source and i2c-source
> 2
hi andrew
On Tue, 29 Oct 2002, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Greetings-
>
> I'm trying to get lm-sensors to work, mainly to monitor the CPU
> temperature in my machine. I know the chip is an lm78, as reported by the
> following output from sensors-detect:
>
> Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78
Note that you also get the following:
> Probing for `ITE IT8705F / IT8712F / SiS 950'
> Trying address 0x0290... Success!
> (confidence 7, driver `it87')
You might try 'modprobe it87'. That one works for me, although I used
i2c-source and lm-sensors-source to compile modules instead of jus
On Thursday 06 June 2002 23:34, David Z Maze wrote:
> Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:34:55PM -0400, Bob Underwood wrote:
> >> are the new lm-sensors and libsensors2 available somewhere? if so,
> >> where? i just checked unstable and the packages are the sa
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:34:55PM -0400, Bob Underwood wrote:
>> are the new lm-sensors and libsensors2 available somewhere? if so,
>> where? i just checked unstable and the packages are the same as in
>> woody.
>
> Has anybody else noticed sid aging li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 10:34:55PM -0400, Bob Underwood wrote:
> are the new lm-sensors and libsensors2 available somewhere? if so, where? i
> just checked unstable and the packages are the same as in woody.
Has anybody else noticed sid aging like
Not yet...
-Original Message-
From: Simon Hepburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2002 4:19 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Lm-sensors and Woody
Do you have both lm-sensors-source and i2c-source installed ?
On Saturday 02 Mar 2002 3:31 pm, Mike
Do you have both lm-sensors-source and i2c-source installed ?
On Saturday 02 Mar 2002 3:31 pm, Mike wrote:
> I'm trying to set up lm-sensors on woody. I ran sensors-detect and it
> found a sensor on the MB. My question is where do I get/build the
> module? In my case I need i2c-via.o
>
> TIA,
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm trying to set up lm-sensors on woody. I ran sensors-detect and
> it found a sensor on the MB. My question is where do I get/build
> the module? In my case I need i2c-via.o
You need to build the modules from sources provided in the
lm-sensors-source package; insta
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 10:47:24PM +0100, Paul Huygen wrote:
> This week I lost a mobo/processor due to a broken fan :-(. Therefore,
> I would like to monitor the processor temperature. Ti this end I tried
> to install lm-sensors and i2c-source. After Make-ing i2c-sources, I
> checked with sensors
Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MW> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:06:13AM -0500, David Z Maze wrote:
DZM> If you're using an older kernel or want the updated i2c drivers,
DZM> you can also install them from the i2c-source package (in which
DZM> case you should completely disable i2c in the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:06:13AM -0500, David Z Maze wrote:
> If you're using an older kernel or want the updated i2c drivers, you can
> also install them from the i2c-source package (in which case you should
> completely disable i2c in the kernel).
Doesn't the documentation say different? I'm
Stan Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> OK, I'm trying to get lm-ensors working. Several people have pointed me to
SB> the lm-sensors source, and i2c source packages, and the kernel-package
SB> package.
SB>
SB> I'm already building kernels using the kernel-package tools. One of the
SB> nice thi
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:54:17PM -0500, Stan Brown wrote:
> I'm already building kernels using the kernel-package tools. One of the
> nice things about this is that I can place the kernel sources in arbitrary
> places, such as ~/kernel_build/. If I am reading the lm-sensrs
> source README corectl
hi ya mirek
is your system chipset listed in the list of lm_sensors/i2c
supported chipsets?
- some i810 based motherboards are NOT supported
did you run your config option for lmsensor ??
./lm-sensors-2.6.1/prog/detect/sensors-detect
did you create the /dev/i2c-* devices
On 29 May 2001 08:30:31 -0600
"Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Christoph Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just tried to visit the homepage of lm-sensors, but found out that
> > it is being discontinued. Anybody knows about the future of this
> > package? Somebody will take it
"Christoph Simon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just tried to visit the homepage of lm-sensors, but found out that
> it is being discontinued. Anybody knows about the future of this
> package? Somebody will take it over or is there an alternative?
I'm missing something. Looking at what I have fo
Jonathan Daugherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JD> I'd like to install a wm app on my box, but I need the lm_sensors
JD> modules to be installed. I got the source, built the debs, and
JD> install them all, but now I can't find the lm_sensors modules
JD> they're referring to. Can anyone help me ge
Oh well, I didn't modify the include line in the lm_sensors
Makefile. It works now.
I still have to figure out the settings in /etc/sensors.conf for the
lm80. Anybody with a recent VIA-based MB out there?
--
Philipp Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 18 May 2001, David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Philipp Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>PL> In order to access the hardware sensors on my motherboard, I
>PL> installed the lm-sensors-source package and the corresponding
>PL> userland utilities. I need the i2c-viapro kernel module for
Philipp Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PL> In order to access the hardware sensors on my motherboard, I
PL> installed the lm-sensors-source package and the corresponding
PL> userland utilities. I need the i2c-viapro kernel module for my MB
PL> (VIA KT133A/82c686b chipset).
PL>
PL> Now, when I
Philipp Lehman wrote:
> In order to access the hardware sensors on my motherboard, I installed
> the lm-sensors-source package and the corresponding userland
> utilities. I need the i2c-viapro kernel module for my MB (VIA
> KT133A/82c686b chipset).
>
> Now, when I try to patch the kernel (stricly
Hallo Alson!
Am Don, 29 Mär 2001, schrieb Alson van der Meulen:
> i don't have much problems using via apollo chipset, did you build
> both lm-sensors-source and i2c-source?
Mh. I did the following:
apt-get install lm-sensors-source
There was a folder called lm-sensors in /usr/src/modu
Jan Ulrich Hasecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hallo Jens!
>
> I ran sensors-detect. It loaded some modules, but there are no
> additonal files in /proc and no apropriate device-files. It shows me a
> line which already was in /etc/modutils/lm-sensors.
>
> Am Mit, 28 Mär 2001, schrieb Jens Gec
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 11:56:32AM +0200, Jan Ulrich Hasecke wrote:
> Hallo Jens!
>
> I ran sensors-detect. It loaded some modules, but there are no
> additonal files in /proc and no apropriate device-files. It shows me a
> line which already was in /etc/modutils/lm-sensors.
>
> Am Mit, 28 M?r 20
Hallo Jens!
I ran sensors-detect. It loaded some modules, but there are no
additonal files in /proc and no apropriate device-files. It shows me a
line which already was in /etc/modutils/lm-sensors.
Am Mit, 28 Mär 2001, schrieb Jens Gecius:
> But, first RTFM.
Mh, perhaps I should have looked clo
Jan Ulrich Hasecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > There are no /dev/i2c files around. How can I create them. Is there a
> > > skript?
> >
> > Sorry, I forgot: if you want to use the i2c-interface, you also need
> > the i2c-source package. These are some additional modules to make
> > available
Hallo Jens!
Am Mit, 28 Mär 2001, schrieb Jens Gecius:
> > There are no /dev/i2c files around. How can I create them. Is there a
> > skript?
>
> Sorry, I forgot: if you want to use the i2c-interface, you also need
> the i2c-source package. These are some additional modules to make
> available the
Jan Ulrich Hasecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Now what shall I do?
> > > Simply type
> > > make-kpkg -revision=X.X. modules_image
> > > and then
> > > dpkg -i ../modules.X.X.deb
>
> Thanks for your message.
>
> I did the following:
[...]
> debian:/home/juh# modprobe i2c-piix4
> /lib/
Hallo Jens!
Am Die, 27 Mär 2001, schrieb Jens Gecius:
> > Now what shall I do?
> > Simply type
> > make-kpkg -revision=X.X. modules_image
> > and then
> > dpkg -i ../modules.X.X.deb
Thanks for your message.
I did the following:
make-kpkg clean
make-kpkg -revision=custom.1.14 kernel_image
ma
Jan Ulrich Hasecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I apt-got lm-sensors-source and lm-sensors.
>
> The sources are in /usr/src/modules
>
> My current kernel-source is /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.18pre21
>
> I do not want to patch my kernel but use it as a module. I've read
> that I may want to use
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I got this from the authors:
>
> ">
> > Could you try it with the latest kernel and lm-sensors from CVS?
> > There is a chance that this was already solved.
>
> Also please make sure you (or even your distribution) have applied no
> other patches; mkpa
Jens Gecius wrote:
>
> Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just a quick note to say I just downloaded the latest lm-sensors source
> > and still get the same problem during patch generation:
> >
> > mkpatch/mkpatch.pl . /usr/src/linux > /tmp/sensors-patch
> >
> > results in
> >
>
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a quick note to say I just downloaded the latest lm-sensors source
> and still get the same problem during patch generation:
>
> mkpatch/mkpatch.pl . /usr/src/linux > /tmp/sensors-patch
>
> results in
>
> "Automatic patch generation for
Hello Jens,
Just a quick note to say I just downloaded the latest lm-sensors source
and still get the same problem during patch generation:
mkpatch/mkpatch.pl . /usr/src/linux > /tmp/sensors-patch
results in
"Automatic patch generation for 'drivers-Makefile' failed"
"Con
Hello Jens,
Thanks for the reply. I haven't been able to try anything yet, but
there was certainly one thing in your post that I'd failed to do: enable
development in .config
However, the error I was getting was when I tried to create a patch for
the kernel - the patch generating script was fail
Lee Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I used to be able to use lm-sensors with 2.2 and early 2.4.0-test
> kernels i.e. test5, but since 2.4.0-test11 - now 2.4.1, I've been unable
> to generate the sensors patch to apply to the kernel source.
>
> I've been able to generate and apply the i2c pa
Network Systems
e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit us at: http://www.astro.com.my
> -Original Message-
> From: Alvin Oga [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 9:20 PM
> To: Frederik
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: lm-
Problem seems to be related to lm-sensors itself. I've seen one report of
a similar problem. Probably due to the motherboard: a MB-741LMRT. If
someone has any experience on setting up lm-sensors with this kind of
motherboard: i'd be interested :-)
Thanks for the help!
Frederik
hi ya frederik
you probably want to see the cpu temp measurements ???
its at /proc/sys/dev/sensors/<*sis5595*>/temp1
you can see all the stuff its recording in the /proc tree
and if you're nuts like me i run a cron job to copy the cpu
temperature every 5 minutes copy it into a web dir
On 04 Apr 2000 15:52:28 +0200, you wrote:
>* "Marc" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I was missing sensors and w83781d. On the P5A, it now works. However,
>> the temperature values are grossly off, reporting a "temp3" of 208.5
>> Centigrade...
>
>Same here. I think, temp3 is the connect
* "Marc" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was missing sensors and w83781d. On the P5A, it now works. However,
> the temperature values are grossly off, reporting a "temp3" of 208.5
> Centigrade...
Same here. I think, temp3 is the connector for the temperature sensor
(TRPWR in the Man
On 01 Apr 2000 00:37:21 +0200, you wrote:
>Do you have the modules loaded? On my computer (with a p5a-board too),
>it was necessary to add the modules listed below to /etc/modules:
>
>i2c-proc
>i2c-ali15x3
>i2c-dev
>w83781d
>sensors
>smbus
>i2c-core
>
>With this it works.
I was missing sensors and
* "Marc" == Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But, when I invoke sensors itself, it tells me that it couldn't access
> /proc file, and I don't have /proc/sensors. Also, the /dev/i2c nodes
> the docs mention seem to be missing.
> What am I doing wrong?
Do you have the modules loaded? On my
Roy Pluschke wrote:
>
> Salman Ahmed wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to setup lm-sensors for my system which has an Abit BH6
> > motherboard. The last time I tried this on my system was when I was
> > running RedHat-5.2. I remember having a really hard time getting
> > lm-sensors to work, and in the end m
Salman Ahmed wrote:
>
> I'd like to setup lm-sensors for my system which has an Abit BH6
> motherboard. The last time I tried this on my system was when I was
> running RedHat-5.2. I remember having a really hard time getting
> lm-sensors to work, and in the end my system locked up completely befo
97 matches
Mail list logo
