And it works for me as well.
Thanks Johnny!
get the updated libdb2. apt-get install libdb2. This was supposed to be
fixed by now, I guess that the change will take some time to propagate.
dpkg/apt misprioritized things such that perl, which needed the new
version of libdb2, was getting upgraded before libdb2.
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, P Kirk
the trick i did was:
i check /lib/ for any libdb* and then just symlinked the one with the highest
version to /lib/libdb.so.3 (maybe do ln -s /lib/libdb.so.2 /lib/libdb.so.3
), i ran ldconfig, and it worked...
hope this will help...
(--[ on Tuesday 21 August 2001 11:40, P Kirk bothered us wit
Good call! It is a broken symlink.
enterprise:/home/patrick# ls -al /lib/libdb.so.3
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 14 Aug 21 10:00 /lib/libdb.so.3 ->
libdb.so.3.old
enterprise:/home/patrick# locate libdb.so.3.old
enterprise:/home/patrick#
So, what do I need to do to get a libdb.so.3.old
Thanks for replying but still struggling.
| dont worry, it's not that bad.
| i found out when i switched from potato->woody that sometimes you just
have
| to softlink the "missing" files to existing (possibly with lower
| version-numbers) files... or sometimes do a 'dpkg -x /' if it
still
| woul
dont worry, it's not that bad.
i found out when i switched from potato->woody that sometimes you just have
to softlink the "missing" files to existing (possibly with lower
version-numbers) files... or sometimes do a 'dpkg -x /' if it still
wouldnt want to install.
oh yeah, dont forget to run
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 12:56:38AM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> --- Anthony Towns wrote:
> > There are two db2 problems:
>
> > one is an upgrade ordering problem,
> > which is fixed by apt-get install'ing libc6 and db2 before anything
> > else (especially perl).
>
> > The other is a compatibility pro
Thanks Anthony for your prompt & informative reply!
--- Anthony Towns wrote:
> > 1. Would someone please provide a reply email with a workaround for this
> > bug?
>
> There are two db2 problems:
> one is an upgrade ordering problem,
> which is fixed by apt-get install'ing libc6 and db2 before
On Sun, Aug 19, 2001 at 09:49:49PM -0700, tluxt wrote:
> I believe a serious problem exists:
> My requests are:
> Immediately:
> 1. Would someone please provide a reply email with a workaround for this bug?
> 2. Would someone please get this bug fixed?
There are two db2 problems: one is an upgrade
Actually the way I got the libdb mess confiused is that you need to
upgrade libdb2 as a dependency of libdb3. Shows how much I needed
caffeine today...:/
On Fri, 17 Aug 2001, Colin Watson wrote:
>On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:02:32PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 07:02:32PM -0600, John Galt wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >perl: error while loading shared libraries: libdb.so.3: cannot open shared
> >object file: No such file or directory
[...]
> >I looked of libdb.so.3 is in the /lib directory and there it was
You need libdb3. the libdb.so.3 is actually a symlink, part of the libdb2
package. When you get libdb3, it'll be replaced with the actual
libdb.so.3
On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>First I tried to install nmap_2.54.28.BETA-1_i386.deb
>
>It said needs >=libc6_2.2.3-1
>
>So I got
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First I tried to install nmap_2.54.28.BETA-1_i386.deb
>
> It said needs >=libc6_2.2.3-1
>
> So I got libc6_2.2.3-9_i386.deb and installed it.
This was probably a bad idea. I would suggest reinstalling the
version of libc6 you were previously using and building you
On Sunday 12 August 2001 11:43, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hey people.
>
> So, I was told that the solution to upgrading to unstable from stable
> and getting the missing libdb.so.3 library was to upgrade to testing first.
> That did not work. The same thing happened.
>
> I'm working a
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 01:45:59PM +1000, CaT wrote:
>
> Dunno if this was suggested but have you tried putting in the src lines
> for unstable in the apt sources.list file and then doing
>
> apt-get -b source libdb3 (or whatever the package is called)
>
> in some work dir?
Nope. I worked a
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 11:43:20PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier wrote:
> Hey people.
>
> So, I was told that the solution to upgrading to unstable from stable and
> getting the missing libdb.so.3 library was to upgrade to testing first. That
> did not work. The same thing happened.
>
>
Oops,
Sorry, I meant:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user-0009/msg04260.html
Krafty
Michael Smith wrote:
> I ftp'ed libdb.so.3 from a working box, stuck it in the right place on the
> machine, and
> then did an upgrade. It's ugly, but effective, since there's an upgrade that
> overwrites the
This seems to be happening to a lot of people; play with woody for a while and
lose your
shared object libraries. But hey, that's the fun with the development version.
This gets
posted every third day on this list.
Anyway, this is the pill that will save you (it worked for me and some "Pascal
H
I ftp'ed libdb.so.3 from a working box, stuck it in the right place on the
machine, and
then did an upgrade. It's ugly, but effective, since there's an upgrade that
overwrites the "borrowed" version completely.
Thomas Halahan wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I have had very similar problems. I upgraded to
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 09:31:56AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:18:17PM +, Thomas Halahan wrote:
> > Andrew,
> >
> > I have had very similar problems. I upgraded to libc6
> > libc6_2.1.94-1, which caused certain programs (apache, gnome-apt) to
> > not locale libdb.so
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:18:17PM +, Thomas Halahan wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I have had very similar problems. I upgraded to libc6
> libc6_2.1.94-1, which caused certain programs (apache, gnome-apt) to
> not locale libdb.so.3. So I upgraded my libdb2 and this didn't help.
> As encouraged I upg
Andrew,
I have had very similar problems. I upgraded to libc6
libc6_2.1.94-1, which caused certain programs (apache, gnome-apt) to
not locale libdb.so.3. So I upgraded my libdb2 and this didn't help.
As encouraged I upgraded to libc6_2.1.94-3 but I could not becuase
it required libdb.so.3 which
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000 19:23:36 -0700
Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ihad the same problem a couple of days ago--the hard party was that the
> library was
> missing, so I couldn't upgrade to a working version. It tried to
> preconfigure, and
> then perl tanked with the same error messa
Ihad the same problem a couple of days ago--the hard party was that the library
was
missing, so I couldn't upgrade to a working version. It tried to preconfigure,
and
then perl tanked with the same error message that you got. What I did was ftp
to
another machine, grab /usr/lib/libdb.so.3, and
On Sat, 30 Sep 2000, P.J.Walsh wrote:
> dpkg is choking on some upgrades, showing libdb.so.3 missing... dpkg
> -S doesn't help. To what does it belong?
To find out which package it belongs to go to www.debian.org and go to the
packages page. You can look up which package it belongs to.
On 30-Sep-2000 Ben Collins wrote:
>
> This is no longer true. Follow the threads. libc6 2.1.94-3 has zero
> issues.
Thanks, I will upgrade now.
--
Andrew
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 09:54:56PM +, Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 30-Sep-2000 P.J.Walsh wrote:
> > dpkg is choking on some upgrades, showing libdb.so.3 missing... dpkg
> > -S doesn't help. To what does it belong?
>
> It belongs to the libdb package but the problem is with libc6.
> I had to revert
On 30-Sep-2000 P.J.Walsh wrote:
> dpkg is choking on some upgrades, showing libdb.so.3 missing... dpkg
> -S doesn't help. To what does it belong?
It belongs to the libdb package but the problem is with libc6.
I had to revert to the previous versions of libc6, libc6-dev, and locales.
The new lib
28 matches
Mail list logo
