Re: Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2005-06-10 Thread Manuele =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bond=EC?=
Please stop using Sid, if you can. You should progress slowing from Stable, through Testing, to Unstable according to your level of experience and hardware requirements. Good advice Robert. For the time being, though, I think I will stick to Sid, at least until I recover from the recent major

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2005-06-08 Thread roach
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 02:46, Manuele Bondì wrote: > Thank you Robert for your interest and excuse my long delay in replying. No problem, I will sometimes take time replying as well. I have a lot of email to get through. > (ii) I downloaded Sid (Debian 3.1 unstable, did I get that part right

Re: Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2005-06-07 Thread Manuele =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bond=EC?=
Thank you Robert for your interest and excuse my long delay in replying. In fact my original post was a bit out of target; to try and focus on my actual problem I should point out that: (i) I started with Knoppix and had no problems with the installation; (ii) I downloaded Sid (Debian 3.1 uns

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2005-06-03 Thread roach
Hi, Try http://www.knoppix.net/ for info on how to install knoppix. If memory serves me right, there are at least 3 different ways. I get the impression you've chosen the most severe route. I suggest you try again with one of the simpler installations. To save your downloaded files you can col

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2005-06-01 Thread Manuele =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bond=EC?=
Sorry to reopen an old thread but I need help on a tough problem (at least for me, though not a complete newbie I have a limited knowledge of the Linux world) which has Knoppix at its origin (though now it probably is not related to Knoppix any more) and I couldn't find a more pertinent thread.

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-16 Thread Richard Lyons
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 02:19:32PM -0500, David Syme wrote: > I am not sure I agree with the above statement. 'above' ...or was that 'below'? > While RTFM is a bit > impolite, I do think asking knoppix-related questions on a debian > mailing list is a bad idea. I am not saying that there are no

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-15 Thread David Syme
I am not sure I agree with the above statement. While RTFM is a bit impolite, I do think asking knoppix-related questions on a debian mailing list is a bad idea. I am not saying that there are no knoppix experts on this list. But answering knoppix questions will not help debian users or debian in

Re: Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-15 Thread belahcene
thanks for every body, Ok, andreas, the problem is the Debian installer, and specially the aptitude, is very dificult for the novie, I asked many times the developper to insert something like anaconda, refuse ???!!! any way, I use knoppix only for the the first installation ( recognition of the

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-14 Thread John Hasler
Pedro M writes: > Sorry but Debianites are Windoze converts too. _Some_ Debianites are Windoze converts. -- John Hasler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-14 Thread Pedro M (Morphix User)
Alvin Oga escribió: I thought, that the debian users are more tolerant than some others, but as we know now, that´s just not the truth for all of us! most debianites are techies :-) vs non-techies or new windoze converts Sorry but Debianites are Windoze converts too. Better: tolerant de

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-14 Thread andreas . sumper
Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14.12.2004 17:19:35: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:30:38 +0100, belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just download   the last knoppix (3.7), I tried to use the same way > > as with 3.6 > > to install it on HD. But it failed at reboot wi

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-14 Thread Alvin Oga
hi ya deb/knop's :-) On Tue, 14 Dec 2004, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > But imho that is not true. the only differences between knoppix and debian > > are: > > 1. knoppix has the better hardware recognition. :-) -- aka better kernel management -- - without a good default kernel conf

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-14 Thread andreas . sumper
Hi! Sorry for the harsch answer, I just had a very bad day... Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14.12.2004 18:11:37: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:48:18 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >   > > Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14.12.2004 17:19:35

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-14 Thread andreas . sumper
Hi! belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14.12.2004 16:30:38: > Hi, > I've just download   the last knoppix (3.7), I tried to use the same way > as with 3.6 > to install it on HD. But it failed at reboot with following errors: > > can't find ext3 on dev > cat't find vfat  on dev  

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-14 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:48:18 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14.12.2004 17:19:35: > > > But imho that is not true. the only differences between knoppix and debian > are: > 1. knoppix has the better hardware recognition.

Re: knoppix HD-install problem

2004-12-14 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 16:30:38 +0100, belahcene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I've just download the last knoppix (3.7), I tried to use the same way > as with 3.6 > to install it on HD. But it failed at reboot with following errors: > Short answer :- Ask in the knoppix mailing lists. Long a