On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 3:02 PM George Olson
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/22 18:41, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:05 PM songbird wrote:
>
>> Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>> ...
>> > Testing and Sid track pretty close to the latest kernel releases.
>> Testing
>> > curren
On 12/16/22 18:41, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:05 PM songbird wrote:
Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
...
> Testing and Sid track pretty close to the latest kernel
releases. Testing
> currently has version 6.0.10. New kernel versions are first
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 2:05 PM songbird wrote:
> Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
> ...
> > Testing and Sid track pretty close to the latest kernel releases. Testing
> > currently has version 6.0.10. New kernel versions are first uploaded to
> Sid
> > then after about a week they are uploaded to tes
Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
...
> Testing and Sid track pretty close to the latest kernel releases. Testing
> currently has version 6.0.10. New kernel versions are first uploaded to Sid
> then after about a week they are uploaded to testing. Testing, when not in
> freeze, is more like a rolling di
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 8:01 AM wrote:
> On Thursday, December 15, 2022 11:35:04 PM George Olson wrote:
> > I have an RX 6600 XT also. I use a 4 monitor setup and had to configure
> > things so that it would work with 2 on top and 2 on the bottom. I can't
> > remember exactly how I did it, but I
Le 20/08/2017 à 01:08, Borden Rhodes a écrit :
Here is the output from my system:
$ modinfo 4.12.0-1-amd64 xts
modinfo: ERROR: Module 4.12.0-1-amd64 not found.
You forgot the -k option before the version.
Otherwise, you can directly probe the file :
modinfo /lib/modules/4.12.0-1-amd64/kernel/
Thank you for your response, Pascal,
Thank you, also, for your very clear instructions. It's nice not
having to guess the rest of the command I need to use. My kernel
hacking abilities are elementary, at best.
Here is the output from my system:
$ modinfo 4.12.0-1-amd64 xts
modinfo: ERROR: Module
Le 19/08/2017 à 08:48, Borden Rhodes a écrit :
I'm on the Buster repo. For all kernels released after 4.9, I can't
boot into my system, which has all encrypted partitions except for
/boot. I think tihs is my problem, as I get the same symptoms:
https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/issues/319
Hello.
> Can anyone verify this, or is it just me? Is it possible I missed a kernel
> config parameter required to allow the PAE-enabled kernel to boot in a KVM
> session? Could it be a Debian build problem? An upstream kernel problem? Or a
> qemu-kvm problem?
I was able to boot the IS
On Thursday 07 August 2008 11:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nigel and anyone interested in alsa and USB development,
>
> nh> ... both snd-intel8x0, and snd-hda-intel are
> being loaded, and it seems like they are both trying to grab card0, which
> is resulting in neither getting card0, and snd-usb
Nigel and anyone interested in alsa and USB development,
nh> ... both snd-intel8x0, and snd-hda-intel are
being loaded, and it seems like they are both trying to grab card0, which is
resulting in neither getting card0, and snd-usb-audio is getting card0,
because the other 2 are having a non res
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 02:27, PETER EASTHOPE wrote:
> Nigel & others,
>
> At Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:39:40 +0200 N.H. wrote,
> "... Lenny install, I have the following kernels available.
> 2.6.8
> 2.6.11"
>
> With /etc/apt/sources.list set to lenny,
> dselect offers only 2.6.16 and 2.6.25.
> Can d
PETER EASTHOPE (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> Nigel & others,
>
> At Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:39:40 +0200 N.H. wrote,
> "... Lenny install, I have the following kernels available.
> 2.6.8
> 2.6.11"
>
> With /etc/apt/sources.list set to lenny,
> dselect offers only 2.6.16 and 2.6.25.
> Can dselect ins
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 07:30:07AM -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:26:13AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> >
> >>drifting OT, but to help improve your "snappiness" try some of the
> >>lightwieght WM's (like IceWM) or a tiled one like
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 07:30 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:26:13AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >
> >
> >>drifting OT, but to help improve your "snappiness" try some of the
> >>lightwieght WM's (like IceWM) or a tiled one like WMII w
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:26:13AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
drifting OT, but to help improve your "snappiness" try some of the lightwieght
WM's (like IceWM) or a tiled one like WMII which I'm really starting to like.
Or even fvwm. Check it out - very
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:26:13AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> drifting OT, but to help improve your "snappiness" try some of the
> lightwieght WM's (like IceWM) or a tiled one like WMII which I'm really
> starting to like.
Or even fvwm. Check it out - very lightweight - very configura
On Sat, 01 Apr 2006 18:23:32 +0100
"B.Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 10:44 -0600, Chance Platt wrote:
>
> > The feeling of responsiveness on the desktop... but more how
> > quickly the menus snap down and their dialogs to appear. For these
> > kinds of things, the o
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 18:23 +0100, B.Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 10:44 -0600, Chance Platt wrote:
>
> > The feeling of responsiveness on the desktop... but more how
> > quickly the menus snap down and their dialogs to appear. For these
> > kinds of things, the optimized binary makes a
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 10:44 -0600, Chance Platt wrote:
> The feeling of responsiveness on the desktop... but more how
> quickly the menus snap down and their dialogs to appear. For these
> kinds of things, the optimized binary makes a marked improvement.
>
> chance
>
>
>
True, this feels a l
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 10:12 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> B.Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 12:09 +0100, B.Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>I imagine the performance gain will probably be negligible on a desktop
> >>at home, or are there other benefits like better media support?
B.Hoffmann wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 12:09 +0100, B.Hoffmann wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>I imagine the performance gain will probably be negligible on a desktop
>>at home, or are there other benefits like better media support?
>>
>>Thanks again.
>>
>
>
>
> Not to worry, I'll just try out if it act
On Sat, 2006-04-01 at 12:09 +0100, B.Hoffmann wrote:
> Hello,
> I imagine the performance gain will probably be negligible on a desktop
> at home, or are there other benefits like better media support?
>
> Thanks again.
>
Not to worry, I'll just try out if it actually makes a difference on a
99
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
I had a bridge up on that host as i was using UML.
However, I was in the process of moving my UML's to vservers and so i
didn't need the bridge anymore. After i removed the bridge, the
networking was fast again. Don't know why that gave problems with
certain kernels but i
Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when connect from an WinXp machine to my sarge server with a 2.6.10
> kernel, connectivity to the server is great.
> However, when i upgrade to a 2.6.11 up to a 2.6.14, performance is
> not great at all.
> With connectivity i mean IMAP & smb. I keep my mail on th
Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
I would like to know what problems could occur from installing both
kernels in sarge and how to deal with them. I can think of
1. alsa problems
2. cdrecord problems
3. mounting points problems (cdrom is expected in different places)
4. X problems (mouse expected in diffe
* On 2004:03:08:15:20:15-0600 I, Michael D Schleif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, scribed:
> * David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:03:08:19:27:39+] scribed:
> > On Monday 08 March 2004 18:57, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > > * Alexis Huxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:03:08:15:06:04+] scribed:
>
* David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:03:08:19:27:39+] scribed:
> On Monday 08 March 2004 18:57, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> > * Alexis Huxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:03:08:15:06:04+] scribed:
> > > > Regardless of kernel, I see this:
> > > >
> > > ># cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> > > >
On Monday 08 March 2004 18:57, Michael D Schleif wrote:
> * Alexis Huxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:03:08:15:06:04+] scribed:
> > > Regardless of kernel, I see this:
> > >
> > ># cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> > >Attached devices:=20
> > >Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 00
> > > Ven
* Alexis Huxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004:03:08:15:06:04+] scribed:
> > Regardless of kernel, I see this:
> >
> ># cat /proc/scsi/scsi
> >Attached devices:=20
> >Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: HP Model: C1537A Rev: L812
> > Type: Seque
># sudo mt -f /dev/nst0 offline
>mt: No such device. Cannot open '/dev/nst0'.
> Now, after reboot back into 2.4.25, /dev/nst0 is working fine, and I am
> flushing last night's backup to tape as I compose this.
Well you've done your homework and checked the obvious things.
It looks to me
> Regardless of kernel, I see this:
>
># cat /proc/scsi/scsi
>Attached devices:=20
>Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 05 Lun: 00
> Vendor: HP Model: C1537A Rev: L812
> Type: Sequential-AccessANSI SCSI revision: 02
>. . .
>
Just because the devi
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 01:06:19PM +0100, jjluza wrote:
> look at this :
> http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1587
Thanks
Johann
--
Johann Spies Telefoon: 021-808 4036
Informasietegnologie, Universiteit van Stellenbosch
"Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and
the lif
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, Romain Lerallut wrote:
> Thus spake Keith O'Connell on Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 07:34:08AM +:
> > Yes you did, and that was the post that sent me (as a newbie) into
> > dselect looking for "newbiedoc" but it isn't there. Some of the
> > followup posts make me see that is must b
Thus spake Keith O'Connell on Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 07:34:08AM +:
> Yes you did, and that was the post that sent me (as a newbie) into
> dselect looking for "newbiedoc" but it isn't there. Some of the
> followup posts make me see that is must be part of "woody" or "sid".
>
> Therein lies the pr
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 08:59:50AM +, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I wander about sites, I periodically see references to a document in
> ascii/html/pdf format with a title along the lines of "Kernels - The
> Debian Way", but I cannot seem to find it, and I think I would like to
> read
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 07:34:08AM +, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> Serafim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Only a few days ago I posted (part of) the description of the package
> > newbiedoc:
> >
> > Current release includes:
> > ---> Compiling kernels the Debian way
>
> Yes you did,
Serafim Zanikolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 08:59:50AM +, Keith O'Connell wrote:
>
>Only a few days ago I posted (part of) the description of the package
> newbiedoc:
>
> Current release includes:
> ---> Compiling kernels the Debian way
Yes you did, and that
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 08:59:50AM +, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> As I wander about sites, I periodically see references to a document in
> ascii/html/pdf format with a title along the lines of "Kernels - The
> Debian Way", but I cannot seem to find it, and I think I would like to
> read it.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:09:08AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> | Keith O'Connell wrote:
> | >
> | > Hi,
> | >
> | > As I wander about sites, I periodically see references to a document in
> | > ascii/html/pdf format with a title along the lines of "Kernels - The
> | > Debian Way", but I cannot
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:09:08AM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
| Keith O'Connell wrote:
| >
| > Hi,
| >
| > As I wander about sites, I periodically see references to a document in
| > ascii/html/pdf format with a title along the lines of "Kernels - The
| > Debian Way", but I cannot seem to find it,
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 08:59:50AM +, Keith O'Connell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I wander about sites, I periodically see references to a document in
> ascii/html/pdf format with a title along the lines of "Kernels - The
> Debian Way", but I cannot seem to find it, and I think I would like to
> read
Keith O'Connell wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As I wander about sites, I periodically see references to a document in
> ascii/html/pdf format with a title along the lines of "Kernels - The
> Debian Way", but I cannot seem to find it, and I think I would like to
> read it.
>
> If it exists could someone giv
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 10/19/98
at 07:14 PM, Paul Crowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'm thinking of moving over to the 2.1 series kernels, since it seems
>that they're pretty stable these days. Will this make life very much
>harder for me?
I don't think so. I am using 2.1.125 with no pa
Almost ll debian packages should work w/ either 2.x kernel. kerneld needs to
be turned off by commenting auto from /etc/modules. Everything else should
work fine.
On 19-Oct-98 Paul Crowley wrote:
> I'm thinking of moving over to the 2.1 series kernels, since it seems
> that they're pretty stabl
On Wed, 15 Apr 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Can anyone suggest an easy way to ensure that I never download a debian
> kernel package where I already have a custom kernel installed?
> dpkg/apt/dselect
> continually replace my kernel-package-2.0.33 with the standard one,
> which doesn't suite my h
Hi,
> Can anyone suggest an easy way to ensure that I never download a debian
> kernel package where I already have a custom kernel installed?
> dpkg/apt/dselect
> continually replace my kernel-package-2.0.33 with the standard one,
> which doesn't suite my hardware at all of course (and causes ra
47 matches
Mail list logo
