#include
* remigio [Mon, Jan 22 2007, 06:30:29AM]:
> boot and dvd-writer problems
> From:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date:
> Today 15:23:25
>
> Hello,
> I've installed Debian testing 2.6.18-3-486 on a PIV 2.8 GHz equiped
> with a
> dvd-rom and a dvd-writer.
> On bios the
At 1148299046 past the epoch, Marco wrote:
> klatt-st ha scritto:
> >have a look at /sys/module/*/parameters.
Thanks for that, very informative...
--
Jon Dowland
http://alcopop.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
At 1148251289 past the epoch, Leon wrote:
> Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > with "lsmod" I see the modules loaded, but what should I type in
> > order to see what options they were loaded with?
Take a look through /proc/modules. Is the information you want present
there?
--
Jon Dowland
klatt-st ha scritto:
-+--+-in reply to:
subj: Kernel modules stupid question [0.4K/0L]
from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (To debian-user@lists.debian.org)
date: 21May2006 @ 22:32 (141th doy|1148247145 sse)
-+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+-->
hi Marco,
have a look at /sys/module/*/parameter
Leon ha scritto:
Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi everybody,
with "lsmod" I see the modules loaded, but what should I type in order
to see what options they were loaded with?
Maybe `modinfo'?
Hi Leon,
I have tried with modinfo, but I don't see what I want to see :-(
Any idea
Marco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi everybody,
> with "lsmod" I see the modules loaded, but what should I type in order
> to see what options they were loaded with?
>
Maybe `modinfo'?
--
Leon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:28:54AM -0700, Account for Debian group mail wrote:
>
>
> I'm in the process of upgrading some very old machines. I'd like to know
> where I can find out on 2.4 kernels which modules are included included
> in the Debian kernel-images. My concern is that these machine a
2005/8/19, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Did you ever run a 2.4 kernel on that box?
Actually not. I I've ran only 2.6 kernels so far.
> If so, you may have both
> module-init-tools and (I think) modutils starting on boot (check
> /etc/init.d). As I recall, they both try to do more or less t
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:32:15PM +0200, Piero Piutti wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I run Etch with a custom build 2.6.12 kernel ("vanilla" with the CK
> patches applied and built using kpkg). The kernel has been configured
> according to my hardware (my pc is a HP NX9010 notebook) and it works
> nicely.
Piero Piutti wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I run Etch with a custom build 2.6.12 kernel ("vanilla" with the CK patches
> applied and built using kpkg). The kernel has been configured according to my
> hardware (my pc is a HP NX9010 notebook) and it works nicely.
>
> I have noticed though that during the
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 03:32:15PM +0200, Piero Piutti wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I run Etch with a custom build 2.6.12 kernel ("vanilla" with the CK patches
> applied and built using kpkg). The kernel has been configured according to my
> hardware (my pc is a HP NX9010 notebook) and it works nicely.
>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:14:33AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:13:45PM -0500, adam morley wrote:
> > However, I can't access the above page at people.debian.org because I
> > get a redirection loop in both Mozilla and w3m. I reported this to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 3 D
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 05:13:45PM -0500, adam morley wrote:
> However, I can't access the above page at people.debian.org because I
> get a redirection loop in both Mozilla and w3m. I reported this to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 3 Dec 2003, but have not received a
> response.
>
> I'm guessing people.
On Don, 3 Juli 2003 13:43:24 -0500, Abrasive wrote:
> Okay, once again I'm having trouble installing a display driver: Intel 845-G
> I downloaded the drivers from http://www.intel.com
> And after unpacking the tarball, I run ./install.sh
> Everything runs fine until it needs to compile a new agpart
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 02:43:18PM -0500, Xavier Barnabe-Theriault wrote:
> hello
>
> this is not totaly related to debian.
>
> The question is kind of open:
>
> Should we put every modules we can into modules
> or
> have some of them built-in ??
>
> As I do no
On Thursday 19 September 2002 09:44, Volker Cordes wrote:
> Bob Underwood wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I've asked related questions in the past without success. So,
> > I'll try one more time. I'm just looking for a pointer to the
> > correct place to resolve the difficulty.
> >
> >I'm using the XFr
Bob Underwood wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've asked related questions in the past without success. So, I'll
>try one more time. I'm just looking for a pointer to the correct
>place to resolve the difficulty.
>
>I'm using the XFree86 experimental 4.2.1-0pre1v1 debs because my rage
>pro 128 is not sup
Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. How do I make these modules automatically probed when I startup? The
> file /etc/modules.conf should not be touched, it says.
You can put the module names into /etc/modules.
> 2. Even better, would it be possible to have these modules probed when
Jesper Holmberg wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I have my USB mouse working fine by manually modprobing usb-uhci and
>usbmouse, but I have two questions:
>
>1. How do I make these modules automatically probed when I startup? >The file
>/etc/modules.conf should not be touched, it says.
You can modify it. But
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 01:22:51AM -0400, Bart Himel wrote:
> I did, but I still get the same problem. Funny enough, I went ahead and
> installed the kernel, and the modules 'seem' to work okay, but I'm still
> concerned about that error message.
>
Have you tried running -
# depmod -a
?
IIRC
I did, but I still get the same problem. Funny enough, I went ahead and
installed the kernel, and the modules 'seem' to work okay, but I'm still
concerned about that error message.
At 12:11 AM 9/26/2001 -0500, ktb wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:38:53AM -0400, Bart Himel wrote:
> I've been
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 12:38:53AM -0400, Bart Himel wrote:
> I've been a user of Debian for several years now. Due to a problem with
> libc last week, I had to go through the pain of reinstalling
> everything. Anyway, since then, every time I try to compile a new 2.4.x
> kernel, I get a messa
Jeronimo,
One needs to do *extensive* upgrades to be able to run a 2.4.x kernel on
debian. The structure of the /lib/modules/ has changed big-time!
There is an article about upgrading to a nice 2.4.x on the debian homepage
called "running 2.4 kernels on potato". might just be what you need!.
Your
John Tatum wrote:
>
> Just call me Mr. Newbie. This is my first Debian box and I have reached
> the limits of my current knowledge.
>
> I am looking for info on how to configure kernel modules. I presume
> there is a howto somewhere, but I can't seem to find it.
>
Look in /lib/modules/ for the
John Tatum wrote:
> I am looking for info on how to configure kernel modules. I presume
> there is a howto somewhere, but I can't seem to find it.
http://www.linuxdoc.org
this is where all of the general GNU/Linux docs live and for Debian specific
documentation check out the Debian Documentatio
John Tatum wrote:
>
> Just call me Mr. Newbie. This is my first Debian box and I have reached
> the limits of my current knowledge.
>
> I am looking for info on how to configure kernel modules. I presume
> there is a howto somewhere, but I can't seem to find it.
>
> Specifically, I am trying t
hi,
i'm battling with modules myself at the moment, but i already see the
light at the end of the tunnel...
my suggestion would be to compile a kernle that serves your needs. apt-get
install kernel-source/2.x.x and then basically you find the source under
/usr/src/ together with lots of documen
Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, the point was, that the source of the modules is in
> /usr/src/linux/drivers and because it is source you can compile it (or
> should be able to). And if you compiled, you can usually load it.
Ok.
Here should be mentioned, that building drivers (
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 03:58:03PM +0100, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > How can I compile just one kernel module instead to do make modules
> > > and make modules_install for all modules?
> >
> > Just look at the source of the module you wish to com
Philipp Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How can I compile just one kernel module instead to do make modules
> > and make modules_install for all modules?
>
> Just look at the source of the module you wish to compile i.e
> /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/3c501.c
> There is always a "compile co
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 09:33:56AM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> How can I compile just one kernel module instead to do make modules
> and make modules_install for all modules?
Just look at the source of the module you wish to compile i.e
/usr/src/linux/drivers/net/3c501.c
There is always a
Hamish,
I have a feeling that the people working on the Kernel agree with you. The
reason I say this is because last night when I was setting up my config for
compiling 2.1.128, I noticed a new option that does allow you to use *other*
kernel version modules. This is a step in the right direc
> When I recompiled my kernel, I built alot of stuff into it (like PPP
> etc), that used to be in modules before. Now when I startup, I get lots
> of messages about not being able to find the old modules. Is there any
> easy way to clean up / update the set of modules to be loaded at
> boot-t
>
> When I recompiled my kernel, I built alot of stuff into it (like PPP
> etc), that used to be in modules before. Now when I startup, I get lots
> of messages about not being able to find the old modules. Is there any
> easy way to clean up / update the set of modules to be loaded at
> boot
34 matches
Mail list logo
