Re: Kernel Build Problem: dpkg-gencontrol

David Baron wrote: Building rt patched kernel using: make-kpkg --append-to-version -davidb-rt kernel_image Whatif you did: make-kpkg --revision 1 --append-to-version -davidb-rt kernel_image Hugo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: Kernel Build Failure (long post!)

Jon D. Irish wrote: Hi Nick, Thanks for the help! It fixed my problem and I was able to finish compiling the kernel. I installed it and tried to boot to it, but I keep getting a kernel panic. This stinks because right before the panic I can see ALSA discovering the sound card. The error state

Re: Kernel Build Failure (long post!)

Jon D. Irish wrote: > I am trying to build a kernel off of 2.6.12.3 I want to do this to get > sound working. Thus, I downloaded everything from www.kernel.org > and uncompressed it to /usr/src. Upon running > "make xconfig" I load the default debian config from /boot.Next,

Re: Kernel Build Failure (long post!)

jon, i don't know where you got the instructions for building that kernel, but that is not the way i have read about and have followed instructions from the kernel sites i have followed. use your HOWTO's about building a kernel and try again.. good luck and Peace.ed *

Re: Kernel Build Failure (long post!)

Jon D. Irish wrote: I am trying to build a kernel off of 2.6.12.3 I want to do this to get sound working. Thus, I downloaded everything from www.kernel.org and uncompressed it to /usr/src. Upon running "make xconfig" I load the default debian config from /boot.Next, I

Re: kernel-build-2.6.8 for i386 doesn't exist?!

On 7/19/05, Saman Ghannadzadeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I need the kernel-build-2.6.8 package for arch. i386 in order to compile > some kernel modules. However, it seems that there is no kernel-build-2.6.8 > package available for i386. > > What can I do? are there any alternative p

Re: kernel build questions

Ben Edwards wrote: Maybe I am not building the kernel in the most elegent way. I seem to be using a mixture of EXTRAVERSION and -rev. Not quite sure of the ramifications of these. Douse the .deb file put stuff into /lin/modules? What would you recomend to be the best use of EXTRAVERSION/-re

Re: kernel build questions

Ben Edwards wrote: Colin wrote: Do a "make-kpkg clean" before changing the revision number should do the trick. Ta, that did the trick. When I dpkg -i the image it complaines that '/lib/modules/2.6.3 (may) belongs to a old install', I have been moving it to .old but douse this mean that if I

Re: kernel build questions

Colin wrote: Ben Edwards (lists) wrote: I use the command make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.1 kernel_image to build the kernel, whitch workes fine. However if i use Custom.2 (so I can keep my old kernel) I get the following:- blue:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.2 kernel_im

Re: kernel build questions

Ben Edwards (lists) wrote: I use the command make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.1 kernel_image to build the kernel, whitch workes fine. However if i use Custom.2 (so I can keep my old kernel) I get the following:- blue:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg buildpackage -rev Custom.2 kernel_image I note that

Re: Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

hugo vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There was a post on this list a while ago on g++-3.3. I find that if I > use *that* on rolling Qt, things fall apart. I now use 3.2 for > everything. There was a new g++-3.3 last week in testing. I haven't seen any problems with that one (although, h

Re: Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hell, depends on gcc 3.2? Is that true? Do I really need another gcc > install? Weird. I only have gcc-3.3 (g++-3.3) installed on my system and have no problems recompiling the kernel (with qt3). I did check, and I had installed libqt3-mt-dev instead

Re: Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

Bill Moseley wrote: Geeze, I can't get kernel-image-2.6.5 to work right (wireless busted), so trying to build from source using the new QT interface. Here's my gcc: laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401) Copyright (C) 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is fre

Re: Kernel build: QT package requires older gcc

Here's my gcc: laptop:/home/moseley# gcc --version gcc (GCC) 3.3.3 (Debian 20040401) So I need the qt3 library: laptop:/home/moseley# apt-get install libqt3-dev Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: g++-3.2 gcc-3.2 l

Re: Kernel Build options to get an old Pentium booting 2.4.21

On Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:10:09 +0200, David Creelman wrote: > Hi, > > I've been trying to rebuild a 2.4.21 kernel on an older machine that I > have, a Pentium 90, with 24Mb RAM. > > It boots fine with a kernel that arrives via the boot disks, but when I > try to boot it from my home made kernel, t

Re: Kernel Build Methodology

On 01 Jul 2003 22:05:53 +0200 Johan Parin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've read through chapter 7 in the Debian Reference and man make-kpkg, > but I'm not sure I'm completely clear on the "Debian standard method" > to build the kernel. I built my first custom kernel the way it's > described, no p

Re: Kernel build error

Daniel T. Chen wrote: > No, it appears the culprit is binutils. I just tried to compile 2.4.12-ac3 > + Rik's vm patches and ld bombed out with the exact error described at > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=116041&repeatmerged=yes > > Downgrade to 2.11.92.0.5-2 (it resolved the is

Re: Kernel build error

No, it appears the culprit is binutils. I just tried to compile 2.4.12-ac3 + Rik's vm patches and ld bombed out with the exact error described at http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=116041&repeatmerged=yes Downgrade to 2.11.92.0.5-2 (it resolved the issue for me) and put binutils on h

Re: Kernel build error

hi ya craig did you use "make bzlilo" or sound like you did "make bzImage" if so... take out stuff from the kernel ... - turn it off if you dont use it - PNP, Video for linux, ISDN, Linux Telephone, - turn off all the graphics controllers you're NOT useing - SCSI

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Tom Hoover wrote: > Is there any advantage to building the kernel outside of fakeroot? The fakeroot man page says quite clearly that "Thou shall never configure a anything under fakeroot", so I try to only do the install targets under fakeroot to avoid hard-to-track problems.

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 06:57:48PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > > I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this: > > make-kpkg --revision... build > fakeroot make -f debian/rules kernel-image-deb > fakeroot make-kpkg modules_image > > The above sequence has never failed me. It buil

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:11:23PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > > > Am I misreading the docs? > > I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this: > > Well, now I know. The make-kpkg man page makes it very clear that the only > target

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > > Am I misreading the docs? > I don't know. What I could suggest you to do is this: Well, now I know. The make-kpkg man page makes it very clear that the only target which knows how to deal with rootcmd is buildpackage. I never use it, though. I

Re: Kernel build with kpkg (was Install of VMware)

On Sat, 23 Sep 2000, Tom Hoover wrote: > I've successfully built a new kernel package with make-kpkg, but only if I > use: > > fakeroot -- make-kpkg --revision=custom.X.XX. kernel_image I'll usually run fakeroot make-kpkg ... I've never needed that -- > Am I misreading the docs?

Re: Kernel build problems 2.2.17 - No modversion.h

On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:00:39PM -0700, Keith Goettert wrote: > > After completing successfully a full install of the Debian 2.2.17 product > with optional kernel packages I am unable to locate the modversions.h header > file. Could somebody please tell me what package this little gem is tucked

Re: Kernel build problems 2.2.17 - No modversion.h

On Fri, Aug 11, 2000 at 03:00:39PM -0700, Keith Goettert wrote: > After completing successfully a full install of the Debian 2.2.17 product > with optional kernel packages I am unable to locate the modversions.h header > file. Could somebody please tell me what package this little gem is tucked >

Re: kernel build

Corey Popelier wrote: > Yeah it certainly looks like you need Perl 5.005 (note the .005 in the > path below). I have both 5.004 and 5.005 installed. It's one of the > strange things, Perl, as I installed from 2.1 floppy set, then upgraded to > Potato, and Perl-Base got really mad at me so I had to

Re: kernel build

Ok, a more accurate answer: Long.pm exists in the perl-5.004, and the perl-5.005 packages. Note you have perl-5.004 installed, but not perl-5.005 (altho you do have the -base package - buts its not in the base part.). The make-kpkg is looking specifically for the 5.005 version of that file. I don'

Re: kernel build

Yeah it certainly looks like you need Perl 5.005 (note the .005 in the path below). I have both 5.004 and 5.005 installed. It's one of the strange things, Perl, as I installed from 2.1 floppy set, then upgraded to Potato, and Perl-Base got really mad at me so I had to forcefully remove it for it to

Re: kernel build error

as86 is in the bin86 package. The bin86 package contains the 16-bit assembler and loader. Use apt-get install bin86 or whatever method you use to install it - its under /main/devel. Cheers, Corey Popelier http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sun, 14 May 20

Re: kernel build error

> Where is as86 and what does it do? TIA, > package bin86 this is the x86 16-bit-code assembler. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- If Windows is the answer, I want the problems back!

Re: Kernel build

i forgot to say: you can continue where you ended, with make zImage time isn't lost - hey, i'ts linux ! -- Peter Rabenecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] one night is all that stands between them and freedom- but it's going to be one hell of a night --- Begin Message ---   Javier Velasco schri

Re: Kernel build

  Javier Velasco schrieb: hi javier  Hi Debian users:   I am trying to build a custom kernel based on hamm. Basically I am trying to generate a new kernel with Initio scsi card support, for Pentium processor and only the basic modules I need at home (no more scsi drivers, a few filesystems etc).

Re: Kernel build

Get bin86 package from debian site. ___ Never include a comment that will help | Andrew Ivanov someone else understand your code. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] If they understand it, they don't | ICQ: 12402354 need you.

Re: kernel build

On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, Waif W. Urchin wrote: > Ok, > > This is a long tale to get to my question, so please bear with the > background info. Sure... > I downloaded Debian 2.0.34 from the debian mirror site a couple weeks > ago. Pulled all the base files, the drivers file, etc. I ran rawrite2 >

Re: kernel build

On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, Waif W. Urchin wrote: > I have been trying, for the last 17 hours of my Linux experience to get > a PPP connection running to my ISP. USR Courier external (not winmodem) > on TTYS1 (com2). > > I've used pppconfig, pppsetup, PAP, CHAP, Chat, and the Lord's prayer > all to n

Re: Kernel build and install problems

Bill Leach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BL> I had some surprising trouble building this kernel. I (and indeed, BL> make) could not as86 or ld86. I tried searching in the Packages files BL> and even Packages-Master. I grepped the contents of several (likely in BL> my opinion) packages but coul