Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-12 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:15:12 -0700, briand wrote: > apt-get install vlc yields the following: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > vlc : Depends: vlc-nox (= 1.1.10-1) but it is not going to be installed >Depends: libavcodec52 (>= 4:0.6-1~) but 4:0.5.2-6 is to be >

Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-12 Thread briand
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:36:10 +0200 Johan Grönqvist wrote: > 2011-07-12 05:52, bri...@aracnet.com skrev: > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:11:00 +1000 > > Scott Ferguson wrote: > > > >> On 12/07/11 11:15, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: > >>> apt-get install vlc yields the following: > >>> > >>> The following

Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-12 Thread briand
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:32:19 +1000 Scott Ferguson wrote: I do exactly what you say, generally. I forgot to recomment the stupid line last time I pulled in a multimedia package. > Anyway - the problem is a little fiddly by easily fixed. > > If it was me I'd:- > comment out anything that is no

Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-12 Thread briand
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:36:10 +0200 Johan Grönqvist wrote: > 2011-07-12 05:52, bri...@aracnet.com skrev: > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:11:00 +1000 > > Scott Ferguson wrote: > > > >> On 12/07/11 11:15, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: > >>> apt-get install vlc yields the following: > >>> > >>> The following

Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-11 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 12/07/11 13:52, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:11:00 +1000 > Scott Ferguson wrote: > >> On 12/07/11 11:15, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: >>> apt-get install vlc yields the following: >>> >>> The following packages have unmet dependencies: >>> vlc : Depends: vlc-nox (= 1.1.10-1

Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-11 Thread Johan Grönqvist
2011-07-12 05:52, bri...@aracnet.com skrev: On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:11:00 +1000 Scott Ferguson wrote: On 12/07/11 11:15, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: apt-get install vlc yields the following: The following packages have unmet dependencies: vlc : Depends: vlc-nox (= 1.1.10-1) but it is not goin

Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-11 Thread shawn wilson
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 23:52, wrote: > anyway to "reset" the package list or otherwise check it for consistency ? last i checked (messed up) the db was plain text and if you ... it. :) let me rephrase that to be more proper / technical - no transaction, no roll back, no *log, no integrity

Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-11 Thread briand
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:11:00 +1000 Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 12/07/11 11:15, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: > > apt-get install vlc yields the following: > > > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > vlc : Depends: vlc-nox (= 1.1.10-1) but it is not going to be installed > >De

Re: is vlc package on really broken or is it just me

2011-07-11 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 12/07/11 11:15, bri...@aracnet.com wrote: > apt-get install vlc yields the following: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > vlc : Depends: vlc-nox (= 1.1.10-1) but it is not going to be installed >Depends: libavcodec52 (>= 4:0.6-1~) but 4:0.5.2-6 is to be installed or >