Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:12:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:51:01 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Except that the -H option of ps does *not* show the child PID's:
(...)
Hum... no, the "H" flag ("ps -AlH") should display the same number of
processes than "ps -Al"
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:12:22 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:51:01 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
>> Except that the -H option of ps does *not* show the child PID's:
>
> (...)
>
> Hum... no, the "H" flag ("ps -AlH") should display the same number of
> processes than "ps -Al" *b
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:51:01 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> Question then is what kind of PID is listing htop :-?
>>
>> (searching...)
>>
>> Oh, okay :-)
>>
>> Why does htop show lots of apache2 processes by ps aux doesn't?
>> http://serverfault.com/questions/24198/why-does
Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:25:31 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
You can also make use of the switches of "htop" like "s" to strace the
misterious process :-?
I asked on the apcupsd mailing list and it is normal for apcupsd to show
that extra PID. Mysql does the
Camaleón wrote:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:25:31 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
You can also make use of the switches of "htop" like "s" to strace the
misterious process :-?
I asked on the apcupsd mailing list and it is normal for apcupsd to show
that extra PID. Mysql does the
Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:49:47 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
that produces a blank: no ideas :-(
Maybe because the process is already gone :-?
Can you still see it under htop/top?
Rebooted, new PIDs, apcupsd on htop has 2: 2594 and 2550 but ps only
shows 2550
On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:25:31 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> You can also make use of the switches of "htop" like "s" to strace the
>> misterious process :-?
>>
>>
> I asked on the apcupsd mailing list and it is normal for apcupsd to show
> that extra PID. Mysql does the sam
Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:49:47 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
that produces a blank: no ideas :-(
Maybe because the process is already gone :-?
Can you still see it under htop/top?
Rebooted, new PIDs, apcupsd on htop has 2: 2594 and 2550 but ps only
shows 2550
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:49:47 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>>> that produces a blank: no ideas :-(
>>
>> Maybe because the process is already gone :-?
>>
>> Can you still see it under htop/top?
>
> Rebooted, new PIDs, apcupsd on htop has 2: 2594 and 2550 but ps only
> shows 2
Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:33:18 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:48:44 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
When I look of apcupsd in htop I see 2 pids: 2632 + 2610 When I do:
~Thu Feb 10-12:47:03SDA6# ps -Al|grep apcupsd 1 S 0 2610 1 0
10
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:33:18 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:48:44 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>
>>> When I look of apcupsd in htop I see 2 pids: 2632 + 2610 When I do:
>>>
>>> ~Thu Feb 10-12:47:03SDA6# ps -Al|grep apcupsd 1 S 0 2610 1 0
>>>
On Feb 10, 2011 2:33 PM, "Hugo Vanwoerkom" wrote:
>
> Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:48:44 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>
>>> When I look of apcupsd in htop I see 2 pids: 2632 + 2610 When I do:
>>>
>>> ~Thu Feb 10-12:47:03SDA6# ps -Al|grep apcupsd 1 S 0 2610 1 0
100 0 -
Camaleón wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:48:44 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
When I look of apcupsd in htop I see 2 pids: 2632 + 2610 When I do:
~Thu Feb 10-12:47:03SDA6# ps -Al|grep apcupsd
1 S 0 2610 1 0 100 0 - 11588 - ?00:00:02 apcupsd
I only see 1 pid. Why the di
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:48:44 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> When I look of apcupsd in htop I see 2 pids: 2632 + 2610 When I do:
>
> ~Thu Feb 10-12:47:03SDA6# ps -Al|grep apcupsd
> 1 S 0 2610 1 0 100 0 - 11588 - ?00:00:02 apcupsd
>
> I only see 1 pid. Why the difference
14 matches
Mail list logo
