On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:12:22 +0000, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:51:01 -0600, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
>> Except that the -H option of ps does *not* show the child PID's:
>
> (...)
>
> Hum... no, the "H" flag ("ps -AlH") should display the same number of
> processes than "ps -Al" *but* in a threathed format :-)
Wait... "H" do make indeed a little difference, look:
sm01@stt008:~$ ps -AlH | wc -l
133
sm01@stt008:~$ ps -Al H | wc -l
173
It's not "-H" but just "H", passed alone. There are two different
modifiers.
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.02.11.18.32...@gmail.com
