On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:02:27 -0700, Go Linux wrote:
> After I installed Squeeze on a brand new drive, it automagically found
> the old Hardy install on a second drive. It was absolutely painless.
> Grub2 on my Squeeze is 1.98+20100804-14.
Your scenario is quite opposite to mine. You installed Sq
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:53:40 -0400, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:10:01 Juan R. de Silva said:
>
> I don't know what you're using there Juan, but this combination of
> packages works flawlessly at present and displays a vociferous ability
> to find bootable partitions and drives
After I installed Squeeze on a brand new drive, it automagically found the old
Hardy install on a second drive. It was absolutely painless. Grub2 on my
Squeeze is 1.98+20100804-14.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:10:01 Juan R. de Silva said:
I don't know what you're using there Juan, but this combination of
packages works flawlessly at present and displays a vociferous ability
to find bootable partitions and drives if you're using a pc bios.
grub-common 1.99-8
grub-pc 1.99-8
grub-
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 14:21:53 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Juan R. de Silva
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:48:40 +, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:59:41 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>>>
>>> (...)
>>>
Isn't it a faulty/buggy behaviour? Wasn't
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Juan R. de Silva
wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:48:40 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:59:41 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>>> Isn't it a faulty/buggy behaviour? Wasn't GRUB or os-prober supposed to
>>> find newly installed OS wi
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 13:48:40 +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:59:41 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> Isn't it a faulty/buggy behaviour? Wasn't GRUB or os-prober supposed to
>> find newly installed OS without it's root being mounted first? Or I
>> misunderstand somethi
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:59:41 +, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
(...)
> Isn't it a faulty/buggy behaviour? Wasn't GRUB or os-prober supposed to
> find newly installed OS without it's root being mounted first? Or I
> misunderstand something here?
I've found an Ubuntu bug report for a similar issue:
8 matches
Mail list logo