Re: glibc2.1 in chroot() in slink?

2000-02-21 Thread Peter S Galbraith
aphro wrote: > was thinking about this for a while, would it be possible to install > glibc2.1 in a chroot() enviornment in slink? has anyone tried > this? It's the standard way to get build-depends information, so it's pretty common. I do all my potato builds on a chroot potato on a slink sys

Re: glibc2.1 in chroot() in slink?

2000-02-18 Thread Brad
On Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 08:21:47AM -0800, aphro wrote: > was thinking about this for a while, would it be possible to install > glibc2.1 in a chroot() enviornment in slink? has anyone tried this? i > got too much stuff customized in my home machine to upgrade it to potato > 99.9% of my important

Re: glibc2.1

1999-11-10 Thread Onno
At 08:28 AM 11/10/99 -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote: >On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Ethan Benson wrote: > > : does anyone know what is broken? is it apt-get or is it the non-US > : site, it looks to me like the non-US site is in order... > >non-us.debian.org was unreachable (at least from here) yesterday - >a

Re: glibc2.1

1999-11-10 Thread Nathan E Norman
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Ethan Benson wrote: : does anyone know what is broken? is it apt-get or is it the non-US : site, it looks to me like the non-US site is in order... non-us.debian.org was unreachable (at least from here) yesterday - apparently there was a routing loop in the Netherlands. --

Re: glibc2.1

1999-11-10 Thread Eric G . Miller
I've been using this for awhile... deb ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian-non-US potato/non-US main contrib non-free -- ++ | Eric G. Milleregm2@jps.net | | GnuPG public key: http://www.jps.net/egm2/gpg.asc | +---

Re: glibc2.1

1999-11-10 Thread Bob Nielsen
I use the following: deb http://pandora.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 05:28:52PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On 9/11/99 Bob Nielsen wrote: > > >1. Point /etc/apt/sources.list to "unstable" instead of "stable". > > This does not appear

Re: glibc2.1

1999-11-10 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Ethan Benson wrote: > why is non-us.debian.org still broken? It isn't. lynx http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US/ works entirely as expected. Jason

Re: glibc2.1

1999-11-10 Thread Ethan Benson
On 9/11/99 Bob Nielsen wrote: deb http://pandora.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free thanks, this works perfectly. why is non-us.debian.org still broken? Best Regards, Ethan Benson To obtain my PGP key: http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/pgp/

Re: glibc2.1

1999-11-10 Thread Ethan Benson
On 9/11/99 Bob Nielsen wrote: 1. Point /etc/apt/sources.list to "unstable" instead of "stable". This does not appear to work on the non-us.debian.org site, i still have to add the lines like so: ... non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US dists/unstable/non-US/main/binary-i386/ does anyone know w

Re: glibc2.1

1999-11-09 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Tue, Nov 09, 1999 at 05:34:46AM -0800, Kenneth Scharf wrote: > Now that potato is delayed until next year I think I > should try upgrading to glibc2.1 at least. There are > just too many fine programs out on freshmeat that > require 2.1 over 2.0. I know that it's been posted > before, but I've

Re: glibc2.1 with slink... will stuff break?

1999-06-08 Thread Sean
If you really need glibc2.1, upgrade to potato. Just sticking glibc2.1 into slink will undoubtedly do nasty things. Sean Craig McPherson wrote: > Can anyone point me towards a document on installing glibc2.1 > under slink? I could have sworn that I found such a reference > somewhere, but now