If you really need glibc2.1, upgrade to potato. Just sticking glibc2.1 into slink will undoubtedly do nasty things.
Sean Craig McPherson wrote: > Can anyone point me towards a document on installing glibc2.1 > under slink? I could have sworn that I found such a reference > somewhere, but now I can't seem to find it again. > > Anyway, is it a relatively safe matter of downloading a few updated > packages & working out dependencies (which is about all I can > handle right now), or is there more to it than that? > > Any pointers appreciated; thanks. > > For those who remember my concern about having mounted a > seperate filesystem as /lib: I found that I couldn't umount the > filesystem while the system was running, because the files were in > use, so I just bit the bullet, took the mount out of fstab, copied all the > libs over to a backup, prayed, and rebooted. A couple of daemons > wouldn't start because of missing libraries, but once I copied the > backups back over to the proper /lib, everything worked just fine. > whew > > -- > Craig McPherson > The University of Arkansas, Fayetteville AR > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ICQ 10262746 > > "This man walks into a bar... and it hurts!" > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
